World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Germany
2026
Award Badge
Psychology
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
166
Citations
114107
World Ranking
1003
National Ranking
48

Psychology

D-Index
156
Citations
106615
World Ranking
61
National Ranking
2

Neuroscience

D-Index
169
Citations
117718
World Ranking
75
National Ranking
1

Niels Birbaumer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels Birbaumer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 780 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Niels Birbaumer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels Birbaumer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 156 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Germany Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2013 - Aristotle Prize, European Federation of Psychologists' Associations
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2003 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Neurosciences

Overview

Niels Birbaumer is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience, with a research focus spanning cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and human-computer interaction.

The scientist's work primarily revolves around topics including EEG and brain-computer interfaces, functional brain connectivity studies, neuroscience and neural engineering, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, muscle activation and electromyography studies, and gaze tracking and assistive technology.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • Spelling interface using intracortical signals in a completely locked-in patient enabled via auditory neurofeedback training, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Neuropsychological and neurophysiological aspects of brain-computer-interface (BCI) control in paralysis, 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • Functional synergy recruitment index as a reliable biomarker of motor function and recovery in chronic stroke patients, 2021, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Psychophysiological treatment of chronic tinnitus: A review, 2022, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Frequent collaborators in their research include Ujwal Chaudhary, Alessandro Tonin, Andres Jaramillo-Gonzalez, Majid Khalili-Ardali, and Aygul Rana.

The scientist has published multiple papers in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Sensors, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Brain Sciences.

Awards received include the Aristotle Prize from the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations in 2013, fellowship in the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009, and membership in the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften in 2003 for work in neurosciences.

Best Publications

  • Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.

    Jonathan R Wolpaw;Jonathan R Wolpaw;Niels Birbaumer;Niels Birbaumer;Dennis J McFarland;Gert Pfurtscheller

  • BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system

    G. Schalk;D.J. McFarland;T. Hinterberger;N. Birbaumer

  • Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting

    J.R. Wolpaw;N. Birbaumer;W.J. Heetderks;D.J. McFarland

  • Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values

    R. Rolke;R. Baron;C. Maier;T.R. Tölle

  • Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report

    Bruce N. Cuthbert;Harald Thomas Schupp;Margaret M. Bradley;Niels Birbaumer

  • Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation

    Herta Flor;Thomas Elbert;Stefan Knecht;Christian Wienbruch

  • A spelling device for the paralysed

    N. Birbaumer;N. Ghanayim;T. Hinterberger;I. Iversen

  • Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior.

    N. Birbaumer;T. Elbert;A. G. M. Canavan;B. Rockstroh

  • Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes

    C. Maier;R. Baron;T. R. Tölle;A. Binder

  • Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study

    Martin Lotze;Pedro Montoya;Michael Erb;Ernst Hülsmann

  • Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback

    Ranganatha Sitaram;Tomas Ros;Luke Stoeckel;Sven Haller

  • Review of the BCI Competition IV

    Michael Tangermann;Klaus Robert Müller;Ad Aertsen;Niels Birbaumer

  • The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems

    B. Blankertz;K.-R. Muller;D.J. Krusienski;G. Schalk

  • Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study

    Ander Ramos-Murguialday;Doris Broetz;Massimiliano Rea;Leonhard Läer

  • Deficient Fear Conditioning in Psychopathy A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Niels Birbaumer;Ralf Veit;Martin Lotze;Michael Erb

  • A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity

    Paul Sauseng;Wolfgang Klimesch;Waltraud Stadler;M. Schabus

  • Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis.

    Niels Birbaumer;Leonardo G. Cohen

  • Breaking the silence: Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control

    Niels Birbaumer

  • The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials

    B. Blankertz;K.-R. Muller;G. Curio;T.M. Vaughan

  • Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation

    Ujwal Chaudhary;Niels Birbaumer;Ander Ramos-Murguialday

  • Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients

    Herta Flor;Christoph Braun;Thomas Elbert;Niels Birbaumer;Niels Birbaumer

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Lutzenberger
Werner Lutzenberger University of Tübingen
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University
Ranganatha Sitaram
Ranganatha Sitaram St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Christoph Braun
Christoph Braun University of Tübingen
Boris Kotchoubey
Boris Kotchoubey University of Tübingen
Ralf Veit
Ralf Veit University of Tübingen
Brigitte Rockstroh
Brigitte Rockstroh University of Konstanz
Robert F. Schmidt
Robert F. Schmidt University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and professional tracks. If you're interested in becoming a mental health provider, specialized pathways such as marriage and family therapy or licensed professional counseling are popular options. Each career path has specific educational and licensing requirements that can vary by location.

For those considering marriage and family therapy, exploring mft requirements in Winston Salem can offer insights into the process. If your goal is to practice as a licensed professional counselor, it’s crucial to understand the unique steps in different states. Learn more about licensed therapist requirements in Albuquerque, or check the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Anaheim and licensed therapist requirements in Anchorage.

Before choosing a program, research each state’s specific regulations and accreditation. Online programs often provide flexibility, but it’s important to confirm that coursework and clinical hours meet national and local licensing standards. With the right degree, you can build a fulfilling career supporting individuals and families in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Niels Birbaumer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles