2013 - Aristotle Prize, European Federation of Psychologists' Associations
2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2003 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Neurosciences
Neuroscience, Electroencephalography, Brain–computer interface, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Brain activity and meditation are his primary areas of study. His Electroencephalography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biofeedback, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Audiology. His Brain–computer interface research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Stroke, Speech recognition, Human–computer interaction and Artificial intelligence.
His Human–computer interaction study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Neuroprosthetics and Identification. His Functional magnetic resonance imaging research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Neuroimaging, Insula, Orbitofrontal cortex and Amygdala. The Brain activity and meditation study combines topics in areas such as Resting state fMRI and Pattern recognition.
Niels Birbaumer mainly focuses on Neuroscience, Electroencephalography, Brain–computer interface, Audiology and Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Brain activity and meditation, Magnetoencephalography, Cognition and Electrophysiology are subfields of Neuroscience in which his conducts study. He has included themes like Stimulus, Biofeedback, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Motor cortex in his Electroencephalography study.
His study focuses on the intersection of Brain–computer interface and fields such as Artificial intelligence with connections in the field of Pattern recognition. His research investigates the link between Audiology and topics such as Developmental psychology that cross with problems in Classical conditioning. His work carried out in the field of Physical medicine and rehabilitation brings together such families of science as Stroke, Rehabilitation, Physical therapy and Paralysis.
Niels Birbaumer focuses on Brain–computer interface, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Neuroscience, Electroencephalography and Brain activity and meditation. His Brain–computer interface research integrates issues from Brain control, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Artificial intelligence and Neuroprosthetics. He has researched Physical medicine and rehabilitation in several fields, including Rehabilitation, Physical therapy, Neurorehabilitation, Stroke and Paralysis.
The various areas that Niels Birbaumer examines in his Electroencephalography study include Motor cortex, Exoskeleton, Decoding methods and Audiology. His research integrates issues of Developmental psychology, Somatosensory system and Insula in his study of Audiology. Niels Birbaumer works mostly in the field of Brain activity and meditation, limiting it down to topics relating to Neuroimaging and, in certain cases, Cognitive psychology.
His scientific interests lie mostly in Brain–computer interface, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Neuroscience, Brain activity and meditation and Neurofeedback. His Brain–computer interface research is under the purview of Electroencephalography. His work deals with themes such as Rehabilitation, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Paralysis and Stroke, which intersect with Physical medicine and rehabilitation.
When carried out as part of a general Neuroscience research project, his work on Motor control, Stimulation, Motor system and Chronic stroke is frequently linked to work in Closed loop, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. The concepts of his Brain activity and meditation study are interwoven with issues in Motor cortex, Arousal, Cognition and Neuroprosthetics. His research in Neurofeedback intersects with topics in Functional connectivity, Cognitive science, Brain mapping and Pattern recognition.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.
Jonathan R Wolpaw;Jonathan R Wolpaw;Niels Birbaumer;Niels Birbaumer;Dennis J McFarland;Gert Pfurtscheller.
Clinical Neurophysiology (2002)
BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system
G. Schalk;D.J. McFarland;T. Hinterberger;N. Birbaumer.
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2004)
Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting
J.R. Wolpaw;N. Birbaumer;W.J. Heetderks;D.J. McFarland.
international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society (2000)
A spelling device for the paralysed
N. Birbaumer;N. Ghanayim;T. Hinterberger;I. Iversen.
Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report
Bruce N. Cuthbert;Harald Thomas Schupp;Margaret M. Bradley;Niels Birbaumer.
Biological Psychology (2000)
Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values
R. Rolke;R. Baron;C. Maier;T.R. Tölle.
Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior.
N. Birbaumer;T. Elbert;A. G. M. Canavan;B. Rockstroh.
Physiological Reviews (1990)
Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study
Martin Lotze;Pedro Montoya;Michael Erb;Ernst Hülsmann.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (1999)
Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes
C. Maier;R. Baron;T. R. Tölle;A. Binder.
Deficient Fear Conditioning in Psychopathy A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Niels Birbaumer;Ralf Veit;Martin Lotze;Michael Erb.
Archives of General Psychiatry (2005)
Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking h-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: