World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 72 685 595 329 280 139 20777

Gary Marks publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary Marks between 1981 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary Marks published across 44 years, from 1981 to 2024, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2001. 7 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2001. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications
1981 2024

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary Marks: publications per year, 1981 to 2024
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 2
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 6
1988 5
1989 3
1990 4
1991 3
1992 4
1993 1
1994 1
1995 5
1996 2
1997 5
1998 4
1999 1
2000 3
2001 8
2002 3
2003 2
2004 7
2005 5
2006 7
2007 4
2008 5
2009 8
2010 2
2011 3
2012 7
2013 5
2014 1
2015 5
2016 7
2017 5
2018 3
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 5
2023 3
2024 4
Total 155
Download as CSV

Gary Marks publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Marks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 139 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 139
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary Marks D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Marks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50 72
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Gary Marks is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the social sciences, with particular focus on education and related subfields. The main areas of study cover education, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, developmental and educational psychology, and political science and international relations.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, especially in school choice and performance, intergenerational and educational inequality studies, cognitive abilities and testing, parental involvement in education, educational and psychological assessments, early childhood education and development, and higher education research studies.

Gary Marks has contributed to the academic community through numerous publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • How much do students' scores in PISA reflect general intelligence and how much do they reflect specific abilities? (2021, Journal of Educational Psychology)
  • Inadequacies in the SES-Achievement model: Evidence from PISA and other studies (2021, Review of Education)
  • Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • The importance of parental ability for cognitive ability and student achievement: Implications for social stratification theory and practice (2023, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility)
  • Cognitive ability and conscientiousness are more important than SES for educational attainment: An analysis of the UK Millennium Cohort Study (2021, Personality and Individual Differences)

Gary Marks has frequently published in venues such as UNC Libraries, Intelligence, Review of Education, Australian Journal of Social Issues, and the Journal of Educational Psychology.

The scientist's collaborative network includes frequent coauthors:

  • Michael O'Connell
  • Liesbet Hooghe
  • Artur Pokropek
  • Francesca Borgonovi
  • Bruce A. Phillips

Best Publications

  • Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs.

    Marks G;Crepaz N;Senterfitt Jw;Janssen Rs

  • Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USA.

    Gary Marks;Nicole Crepaz;Robert S Janssen

  • Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review

    Gary Marks;Norman Miller

  • Highly active antiretroviral therapy and sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review.

    Nicole Crepaz;Trevor A. Hart;Gary Marks

  • Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982-84.

    J M Solis;G Marks;M Garcia;D Shelton

  • Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use.

    John W. Graham;Gary Marks;William B. Hansen

  • Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men.

    Adrian Liau;Gregorio Millett;Gary Marks

  • Towards an understanding of sexual risk behavior in people living with HIV: a review of social, psychological, and medical findings.

    Nicole Crepaz;Gary Marks

  • Efficacy of interventions in improving highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence and HIV-1 RNA viral load. A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.

    Jane M. Simoni;Cynthia R. Pearson;David W. Pantalone;Gary Marks

  • Adverse effects of acculturation: psychological distress among Mexican American young adults.

    Mark S. Kaplan;Gary Marks

  • The Circuit Party Men's Health Survey: findings and implications for gay and bisexual men.

    Gordon Mansergh;Grant N. Colfax;Gary Marks;Melissa Rader

  • Drug use and sexual risk behavior among gay and bisexual men who attend circuit parties: a venue-based comparison.

    Grant N. Colfax;Gordon Mansergh;Robert Guzman;Eric Vittinghoff

  • Are negative affective states associated with HIV sexual risk behaviors? A meta-analytic review.

    Nicole Crepaz;Gary Marks

  • Women's Self-Disclosure of HIV Infection: Rates, Reasons, and Reactions

    Jane M. Simoni;Hyacinth R. C. Mason;Gary Marks;Monica S. Ruiz

  • Prevalence of unprotected anal intercourse among HIV-diagnosed MSM in the United States: a meta-analysis.

    Nicole Crepaz;Gary Marks;Adrian Liau;Mary M Mullins

  • Effect of brief safer-sex counseling by medical providers to HIV-1 seropositive patients: a multi-clinic assessment.

    Jean L Richardson;Joel Milam;Allen McCutchan;Susan Stoyanoff

  • Circumcision Status and Risk of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Meta-analysis

    Gregorio A. Millett;Stephen A. Flores;Gary Marks;J. Bailey Reed

  • Brief strengths-based case management promotes entry into HIV medical care: results of the antiretroviral treatment access study-II.

    Jason A Craw;Lytt I Gardner;Gary Marks;Richard C Rapp

  • Entry and retention in medical care among HIV-diagnosed persons: a meta-analysis.

    Gary Marks;Lytt I Gardner;Jason Craw;Nicole Crepaz

  • Functional Decline in the Elderly: Evidence for Direct and Stress-buffering Protective Effects of Social Interactions and Physical Activity

    Jennifer B. Unger;C. Anderson Johnson;Gary Marks

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicole Crepaz
Nicole Crepaz Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Thomas P. Giordano
Thomas P. Giordano Baylor College of Medicine
Lisa R. Metsch
Lisa R. Metsch Columbia University
Tracey E. Wilson
Tracey E. Wilson SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Gregorio A. Millett
Gregorio A. Millett Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Michael J. Mugavero
Michael J. Mugavero University of Alabama at Birmingham
Norman Miller
Norman Miller University of Southern California
Susan Buchbinder
Susan Buchbinder University of California, San Francisco
Jane M. Simoni
Jane M. Simoni University of Washington
Lynn C. Miller
Lynn C. Miller University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, pursuing an online degree can open up a variety of flexible and meaningful career pathways. Many students consider CACREP-accredited programs for specialized training in counseling. These programs are essential for anyone wishing to become a licensed counselor, ensuring a curriculum that meets high professional standards.

Another popular choice is earning a marriage and family therapist degree online. This pathway prepares graduates to support individuals, couples, and families through complex challenges while providing opportunities for flexible study.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Exploring affordable online psychology degrees can make it easier to access high-quality education without overwhelming debt. These degrees lay the foundation for multiple roles in mental health, research, and community services.

For those passionate about social work, consider investigating the easiest MSW online programs to get into. These Master of Social Work programs are designed for accessibility, opening doors to rewarding careers in various human services fields.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Marks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles