World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Germany
2026

Thomas Elbert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Elbert between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Elbert published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 15.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2014. 11 of the 734 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2014. 1979: 3 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 20 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
1979 2025

734 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Elbert: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 3
1980 7
1981 9
1982 5
1983 5
1984 6
1985 10
1986 2
1987 6
1988 7
1989 2
1990 23
1991 10
1992 11
1993 20
1994 18
1995 18
1996 17
1997 20
1998 18
1999 17
2000 21
2001 19
2002 16
2003 20
2004 23
2005 17
2006 15
2007 25
2008 19
2009 29
2010 23
2011 26
2012 28
2013 28
2014 36
2015 28
2016 22
2017 29
2018 12
2019 8
2020 22
2021 7
2022 5
2023 11
2024 5
2025 6
Total 734
Download as CSV

Thomas Elbert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Elbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Elbert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Elbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Thomas Elbert is affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with an emphasis on clinical psychology. The work spans related subfields such as general health professions, molecular biology, radiological and ultrasound technology, and critical care and intensive care medicine.

Elbert's research covers various topics including:

  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

They have published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • Evolutionary conserved role of neural cell adhesion molecule-1 in memory, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Gender differences in response to war-related trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder - a study among the Congolese refugees in Uganda, 2020, BMC Psychiatry
  • To add insult to injury: Stigmatization reinforces the trauma of rape survivors - Findings from the DR Congo, 2020, SSM - Population Health
  • DNA methylation changes following narrative exposure therapy in a randomized controlled trial with female former child soldiers, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Epigenetics of traumatic stress: The association of NR3C1 methylation and posttraumatic stress disorder symptom changes in response to narrative exposure therapy, 2023, Translational Psychiatry

Their frequent coauthors include Maggie Schauer, Anke Koebach, Katy Robjant, Sabine Schmitt, and Soraya Seedat. Elbert's work has appeared repeatedly in publication venues such as Translational Psychiatry, Aggressive Behavior, BMC Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and the Journal of Traumatic Stress.

In addition to journal publications, Thomas Elbert has contributed to book literature. One such book is titled Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) For Survivors of Traumatic Stress, published by Hogrefe Publishing eBooks, scheduled for release in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players

    Thomas Elbert;Christo Pantev;Christian Wienbruch;Brigitte Rockstroh

  • Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation

    Herta Flor;Thomas Elbert;Stefan Knecht;Christian Wienbruch

  • Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior.

    N. Birbaumer;T. Elbert;A. G. M. Canavan;B. Rockstroh

  • Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Bettina Neininger;Thomas Elbert;Bettina Mohr

  • Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus

    Werner Mühlnickel;Thomas Elbert;Edward Taub;Herta Flor

  • A comparison of narrative exposure therapy, supportive counseling, and psychoeducation for treating posttraumatic stress disorder in an african refugee settlement.

    Frank Neuner;Margarete Schauer;Christine Klaschik;Unni Karunakara

  • Large‐scale neural correlates of affective picture processing

    Andreas Keil;Margaret M. Bradley;Olaf Hauk;Brigitte Rockstroh

  • Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients

    Herta Flor;Christoph Braun;Thomas Elbert;Niels Birbaumer;Niels Birbaumer

  • New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research

    Edward Taub;Gitendra Uswatte;Thomas Elbert

  • Chaos and physiology: deterministic chaos in excitable cell assemblies

    Thomas Elbert;William J. Ray;Zbigniew J. Kowalik;James E. Skinner

  • Fleeting images: a new look at early emotion discrimination.

    Markus Junghöfer;Margaret M. Bradley;Thomas R. Elbert;Peter J. Lang

  • Transgenerational impact of intimate partner violence on methylation in the promoter of the glucocorticoid receptor

    Karl M. Radtke;Martina Ruf;Helen M. Gunter;Katalin Dohrmann

  • Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies

    Markus Junghöfer;Thomas Elbert;Don M. Tucker;Brigitte Rockstroh

  • Psychological trauma and evidence for enhanced vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder through previous trauma among West Nile refugees

    Frank Neuner;Maggie Schauer;Unni Karunakara;Christine Klaschik

  • Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings.

    Christo Pantev;Olivier Bertrand;Carsten Eulitz;Chantal Verkindt

  • Alteration of digital representations in somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia

    Thomas Elbert;Victor Candia;Eckart Altenmüller;Harald Rau

  • Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder by trained lay counselors in an African refugee settlement: a randomized controlled trial.

    Frank Neuner;Patience Lamaro Onyut;Verena Ertl;Michael Odenwald

  • Dissociation Following Traumatic Stress Etiology and Treatment

    Maggie Schauer;Thomas Elbert

  • Tinnitus Perception and Distress Is Related to Abnormal Spontaneous Brain Activity as Measured by Magnetoencephalography

    Nathan Weisz;Stephan Moratti;Marcus Meinzer;Katalin Dohrmann

  • Effects of emotional arousal in the cerebral hemispheres: a study of oscillatory brain activity and event-related potentials.

    Andreas Keil;Matthias M Müller;Thomas Gruber;Christian Wienbruch

  • The Neural Code of Auditory Phantom Perception

    Nathan Weisz;Simona Müller;Winfried Schlee;Katalin Dohrmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Brigitte Rockstroh
Brigitte Rockstroh University of Konstanz
Frank Neuner
Frank Neuner Bielefeld University
Maggie Schauer
Maggie Schauer University of Konstanz
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Iris-Tatjana Kolassa
Iris-Tatjana Kolassa University of Ulm
Tobias Hecker
Tobias Hecker Bielefeld University
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University
Dominique J.-F. de Quervain
Dominique J.-F. de Quervain University of Basel
Claudia Catani
Claudia Catani Bielefeld University
Andreas Keil
Andreas Keil University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The popularity of online psychology degrees has surged, offering increased flexibility for students nationwide. Exploring the best online psychology degree rankings in USA helps you compare reputable programs that meet rigorous academic and accreditation standards.

Many states offer standout options tailored to diverse learning needs. For those who want to focus their studies in the South, the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Texas highlights top institutions with robust virtual curriculums. Similarly, the Midwest features accessible programs, as seen in the online psychology degrees in Wisconsin, where learners find regionally relevant coursework and support.

Beyond online options, students may consider traditional programs in thriving academic cities. For instance, psychology students interested in the Northeast can explore top psychology programs in Albany for on-campus networking and specialized pathways.

Graduates from accredited psychology programs—online or on-campus—can pursue careers in mental health services, counseling, research, human resources, and beyond. Carefully comparing program rankings and formats will help you select the best route for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Elbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles