World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Markus Junghöfer

Markus Junghöfer

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
13950
World Ranking
6307
National Ranking
301

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
13983
World Ranking
6575
National Ranking
556

Markus Junghöfer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Junghöfer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Markus Junghöfer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Junghöfer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Junghöfer is affiliated with the University of Münster in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a notable focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental cognitive psychology. Their work also addresses domains such as neurology, clinical psychology, and sensory systems.

The scientist's recent papers cover a range of topics related to brain function, perception, and anxiety disorders. Some examples include:

  • Contextual information resolves uncertainty about ambiguous facial emotions: Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Clinical predictors of treatment response towards exposure therapy in virtuo in spider phobia: A machine learning and external cross-validation approach (2021, Journal of Anxiety Disorders)
  • Testing the effect of tACS over parietal cortex in modulating endogenous alpha rhythm and temporal integration windows in visual perception (2020, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Perceptual and Neural Patterns of Fear Generalization (2021, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging)
  • Behavioral and Magnetoencephalographic Correlates of Fear Generalization Are Associated With Responses to Later Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Spider Phobia (2021, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging)

Junghöfer's collaborative work features frequent coauthors such as Kati Roesmann, Elisabeth J. Leehr, Thomas Straube, Joscha Böhnlein, and Ulrike Lueken. The pattern of collaboration indicates involvement in multidisciplinary teams exploring anxiety, treatment response, and neural mechanisms.

Their publications appear in various scientific venues, with multiple contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, SSRN Electronic Journal, NeuroImage, and the Journal of Anxiety Disorders.

Their research topics reflect a concentration on:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Best Publications

  • Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies.

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Tobias Flaisch;Jessica Stockburger;Markus Junghöfer

  • The facilitated processing of threatening faces : an ERP analysis

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Arne Öhman;Markus Junghöfer;Almut I. Weike

  • The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis.

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Markus Junghöfer;Almut I. Weike;Alfons Hamm

  • Emotional Facilitation of Sensory Processing in the Visual Cortex

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Markus Junghöfer;Almut I. Weike;Alfons Hamm

  • Fleeting images: a new look at early emotion discrimination.

    Markus Junghöfer;Margaret M. Bradley;Thomas R. Elbert;Peter J. Lang

  • Committee report: Publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography

    Andreas Keil;Stefan Debener;Gabriele Gratton;Markus Junghöfer

  • Selective visual attention to emotion.

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Jessica Stockburger;Maurizio Codispoti;Markus Junghöfer

  • Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies

    Markus Junghöfer;Thomas Elbert;Don M. Tucker;Brigitte Rockstroh

  • Attention and emotion: an ERP analysis of facilitated emotional stimulus processing.

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Markus Junghöfer;Almut I. Weike;Alfons Hamm

  • Emotion and attention in visual word processing - An ERP study

    Johanna Kissler;Cornelia Herbert;Irene Winkler;Markus Junghofer

  • Buzzwords Early Cortical Responses to Emotional Words During Reading

    Johanna Kissler;Cornelia Herbert;Peter Peyk;Markus Junghofer

  • Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading.

    Cornelia Herbert;Markus Junghofer;Johanna Kissler

  • Processing of emotional adjectives: Evidence from startle EMG and ERPs

    Cornelia Herbert;Johanna Kissler;Markus Junghöfer;Markus Junghöfer;Peter Peyk

  • The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording

    Markus Junghöfer;Thomas Elbert;Don M. Tucker;Christoph Braun

  • ElectroMagnetoEncephalography software: overview and integration with other EEG/MEG toolboxes.

    Peter Peyk;Andrea De Cesarei;Markus Junghöfer

  • Amygdala activation during reading of emotional adjectives—an advantage for pleasant content

    Cornelia Herbert;Thomas Ethofer;Silke Anders;Markus Junghofer

  • Stimulus novelty and emotion perception : the near absence of habituation in the visual cortex

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Jessica Stockburger;Maurizio Codispoti;Markus Junghöfer

  • Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex.

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Jessica Stockburger;Florian Bublatzky;Markus Junghöfer

  • Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: A strategy for uncovering cortical sources

    Markus Junghöfer;Thomas Elbert;Paul Leiderer;Patrick Berg

  • Fleeting images: rapid affect discrimination in the visual cortex.

    Markus Junghöfer;Dean Sabatinelli;Margaret M. Bradley;Harald Thomas Schupp

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald T. Schupp
Harald T. Schupp University of Konstanz
Christian Steinberg
Christian Steinberg INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Christo Pantev
Christo Pantev University of Münster
Pienie Zwitserlood
Pienie Zwitserlood University of Münster
Johanna Kissler
Johanna Kissler Bielefeld University
Peter Zwanzger
Peter Zwanzger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alfons O. Hamm
Alfons O. Hamm University of Greifswald
Brigitte Rockstroh
Brigitte Rockstroh University of Konstanz
Dean Sabatinelli
Dean Sabatinelli University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, exploring alternative or complementary online degrees can broaden your academic and career options. For those interested in the clinical side, online programs like the cheapest psyd programs offer a route toward advanced psychological practice without incurring excessive debt.

Another pathway involves mental health services, where online mft programs let you quickly earn credentials to become a licensed marriage and family therapist. Both of these fields frequently intersect with neuroscience research and application.

If you’re eager to start your career faster, consider exploring accelerated bachelors options. These programs enable you to complete your undergraduate studies more quickly and enter the workforce or grad school sooner.

For those focused on return on investment, learning about the highest paying majors can help guide your educational choices in neuroscience and related disciplines, ensuring strong career prospects after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Junghöfer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles