World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
5807
World Ranking
7349
National Ranking
327

Matthias J. Wieser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias J. Wieser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthias J. Wieser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias J. Wieser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias J. Wieser is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a substantial focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Clinical psychology also features prominently as a subfield in their body of work.

Wieser's scholarly output includes a significant number of publications centered on anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Additional research topics cover neural and behavioral psychology studies, memory and neural mechanisms, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, behavioral health and interventions, mindfulness and compassion interventions, as well as heart rate variability and autonomic control.

Their publication record comprises articles in several frequent venues, reflecting their active contribution to specific academic journals. These include:

  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "Attentional threat biases and their role in anxiety: A neurophysiological perspective" (2020), published in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • "Social aversive generalization learning sharpens the tuning of visuocortical neurons to facial identity cues" (2020), published in eLife
  • "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Reactive Aggression and Modulates Electrophysiological Responses in a Forensic Population" (2021), published in Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • "Context-dependent generalization of conditioned responses to threat and safety signals" (2020), published in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • "Acceptance-Based Emotion Regulation Reduces Subjective and Physiological Pain Responses" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology

Wieser collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Marta Andreatta
  • Paul Pauli
  • Alex H K Wong
  • Yannik Stegmann
  • Ingmar H. A. Franken

Best Publications

  • Faces in context: a review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing.

    Matthias J. Wieser;Tobias Brosch

  • Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety? An eye-tracking and psychophysiology study

    Matthias J. Wieser;Paul Pauli;Georg W. Alpers;Andreas Mühlberger

  • Early cortical processing of natural and artificial emotional faces differs between lower and higher socially anxious persons

    Andreas Mühlberger;Matthias J. Wieser;Martin J. Herrmann;Peter Weyers

  • Fear of negative evaluation and the hypervigilance-avoidance hypothesis: an eye-tracking study

    Matthias J. Wieser;Paul Pauli;Peter Weyers;Georg W. Alpers

  • Emotional pictures and sounds: a review of multimodal interactions of emotion cues in multiple domains

    Antje B. M. Gerdes;Matthias J. Wieser;Georg W. Alpers

  • Auditory cortex activation is modulated by emotion: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study

    Michael M. Plichta;Antje B. M. Gerdes;Antje B. M. Gerdes;Georg W. Alpers;Georg W. Alpers;Wilma Harnisch

  • Facial mimicry and the mirror neuron system: simultaneous acquisition of facial electromyography and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Katja U. Likowski;Andreas Mühlberger;Antje B. M. Gerdes;Antje B. M. Gerdes;Matthias J. Wieser

  • Don't look at me in anger! Enhanced processing of angry faces in anticipation of public speaking.

    Matthias J. Wieser;Paul Pauli;Philipp Reicherts;Andreas Mühlberger

  • Probing the attentional control theory in social anxiety: An emotional saccade task

    Matthias J. Wieser;Paul Pauli;Andreas Mühlberger

  • Not so harmless anymore: How context impacts the perception and electrocortical processing of neutral faces

    Matthias J. Wieser;Antje B.M. Gerdes;Inga Büngel;Katharina A. Schwarz

  • Virtual social interactions in social anxiety--the impact of sex, gaze, and interpersonal distance.

    Matthias J. Wieser;Paul Pauli;Miriam Grosseibl;Ina Molzow

  • Why are you looking like that? How the context influences evaluation and processing of human faces

    Katharina A. Schwarz;Matthias J. Wieser;Antje B. M. Gerdes;Andreas Mühlberger

  • Sustained preferential processing of social threat cues: Bias without competition?

    Matthias J. Wieser;Matthias J. Wieser;Lisa M. McTeague;Andreas Keil

  • Psychological Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Pain Rely on Expectation and Previous Experience.

    Philipp Reicherts;Antje B.M. Gerdes;Paul Pauli;Matthias J. Wieser

  • Distinct effects of attention and affect on pain perception and somatosensory evoked potentials.

    Ramona Kenntner-Mabiala;Marta Andreatta;Matthias J. Wieser;Andreas Mühlberger

  • The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses.

    Andreas Mühlberger;Roland Neumann;Matthias J Wieser;Paul Pauli

  • Emotion processing in Parkinson's disease: dissociation between early neuronal processing and explicit ratings.

    Matthias J. Wieser;Andreas Mühlberger;Georg W. Alpers;Michael Macht

  • Brain Activations to Emotional Pictures are Differentially Associated with Valence and Arousal Ratings

    Antje B. M. Gerdes;Matthias J. Wieser;Andreas Mühlberger;Peter Weyers

  • The N2pc component reliably captures attentional bias in social anxiety

    Mario Reutter;Johannes Hewig;Matthias J. Wieser;Matthias J. Wieser;Roman Osinsky;Roman Osinsky

  • Steady‐state visual evoked potentials as a research tool in social affective neuroscience

    Matthias J. Wieser;Vladimir Miskovic;Andreas Keil

  • Social vision: Sustained perceptual enhancement of affective facial cues in social anxiety.

    Lisa M. McTeague;Joshua R. Shumen;Matthias J. Wieser;Peter J. Lang

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Pauli
Paul Pauli University of Würzburg
Andreas Mühlberger
Andreas Mühlberger University of Regensburg
Antje B. M. Gerdes
Antje B. M. Gerdes University of Mannheim
Andreas Keil
Andreas Keil University of Florida
Georg W. Alpers
Georg W. Alpers University of Mannheim
Vladimir Miskovic
Vladimir Miskovic Binghamton University
Rebecca M. Todd
Rebecca M. Todd University of British Columbia
Katharina Domschke
Katharina Domschke University of Freiburg
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and professional pathways. Many students choose to specialize as licensed therapists or counselors, with each state having specific requirements for coursework, internships, and licensure. Whether you are considering Winston Salem mft education requirements or researching what it takes to become a licensed counselor elsewhere, understanding regional guidelines is essential.

For example, those interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Albuquerque must fulfill specific educational and clinical training standards. Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Anaheim outline the coursework, supervised hours, and examinations needed for practice.

If you are considering a move or planning a flexible career, be sure to also review information about becoming a licensed therapist in Anchorage. Online psychology degrees can help you meet these requirements, providing convenient, accredited pathways to unlock fulfilling roles as a therapist or counselor across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias J. Wieser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles