World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
14369
World Ranking
5771
National Ranking
176

Julien Epps publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Epps sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 272 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Julien Epps D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Epps sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julien Epps is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research spans several interconnected disciplines within computer science and psychology, focusing significantly on speech and audio processing technologies and related cognitive aspects.

The scientist's work covers main fields including:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these fields, Epps explores multiple subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Signal Processing
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

The primary research topics of Epps include:

  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Music and Audio Processing

Julien Epps has a record of publications in several journals and conference venues. The frequent publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
  • Speech Communication
  • 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Some recent papers by Epps include:

  • Automatic Detection of COVID-19 Based on Short-Duration Acoustic Smartphone Speech Analysis, 2021, Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research
  • Ordinal Logistic Regression With Partial Proportional Odds for Depression Prediction, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
  • Mamba in Speech: Towards an Alternative to Self-Attention, 2025, IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
  • Read speech voice quality and disfluency in individuals with recent suicidal ideation or suicide attempt, 2021, Speech Communication
  • Development of an Undergraduate Quantum Engineering Degree, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering

Frequent collaborators of Julien Epps include:

  • Beena Ahmed
  • Eliathamby Ambikairajah
  • Vidhyasaharan Sethu
  • Xiangyu Zhang
  • Mostafa Shahin

Best Publications

  • Information Theoretic Measures for Clusterings Comparison: Variants, Properties, Normalization and Correction for Chance

    Nguyen Xuan Vinh;Julien Epps;James Bailey

  • The Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set (GeMAPS) for Voice Research and Affective Computing

    Florian Eyben;Klaus R. Scherer;Bjorn W. Schuller;Johan Sundberg

  • Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: is a correction for chance necessary?

    Nguyen Xuan Vinh;Julien Epps;James Bailey

  • A review of depression and suicide risk assessment using speech analysis

    Nicholas Cummins;Stefan Scherer;Jarek Krajewski;Sebastian Schnieder

  • Signal Processing in Sequence Analysis: Advances in Eukaryotic Gene Prediction

    M. Akhtar;J. Epps;E. Ambikairajah

  • Using Task-Induced Pupil Diameter and Blink Rate to Infer Cognitive Load

    Siyuan Chen;Julien Epps

  • An Investigation of Depressed Speech Detection: Features and Normalization.

    Nicholas Cummins;Julien Epps;Michael Breakspear;Roland Goecke

  • Multimodal assistive technologies for depression diagnosis and monitoring

    Jyoti Joshi;Roland Goecke;Roland Goecke;Sharifa Alghowinem;Abhinav Dhall

  • Multimodal Depression Detection: Fusion Analysis of Paralinguistic, Head Pose and Eye Gaze Behaviors

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Julien Epps

  • Eye activity as a measure of human mental effort in HCI

    Siyuan Chen;Julien Epps;Natalie Ruiz;Fang Chen

  • The INTERSPEECH 2014 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Cognitive & Physical Load

    Björn W. Schuller;Stefan Steidl;Anton Batliner;Julien Epps

  • Multimodal behavior and interaction as indicators of cognitive load

    Fang Chen;Natalie Ruiz;Eric Choi;Julien Epps

  • A study of hand shape use in tabletop gesture interaction

    Julien Epps;Serge Lichman;Mike Wu

  • Automatic classification of eye activity for cognitive load measurement with emotion interference

    Siyuan Chen;Julien Epps

  • Diagnosis of depression by behavioural signals: a multimodal approach

    Nicholas Cummins;Jyoti Joshi;Abhinav Dhall;Vidhyasaharan Sethu

  • Estimating cognitive workload using wavelet entropy-based features during an arithmetic task

    Pega Zarjam;Julien Epps;Fang Chen;Nigel H. Lovell

  • Detecting depression: A comparison between spontaneous and read speech

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Julien Epps

  • Transfer learning for improving speech emotion classification accuracy

    Siddique Latif;Rajib Rana;Shahzad Younis;Junaid Qadir

  • A novel instrument to measure acoustic resonances of the vocal tract during phonation

    J Epps;J R Smith;J Wolfe

  • On DNA Numerical Representations for Period-3 Based Exon Prediction

    M. Akhtar;J. Epps;E. Ambikairajah

Frequent Co-Authors

Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Eliathamby Ambikairajah University of New South Wales
Roland Goecke
Roland Goecke University of New South Wales
Nicholas Cummins
Nicholas Cummins King's College London
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner University of Canberra
Michael Breakspear
Michael Breakspear University of Newcastle Australia
Branko G. Celler
Branko G. Celler University of New South Wales
Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Junaid Qadir
Junaid Qadir Information Technology University
Mark Onslow
Mark Onslow University of Technology Sydney
Gordon Parker
Gordon Parker University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science can open doors to a wide range of online degree options and career paths. Many students who study in the USA also consider related fields to broaden their expertise and enhance employability.

For professionals looking to move into leadership roles, earning a degree from online EMBA programs can provide advanced management skills with a tech-focused approach. Those interested in digital information management often pursue an online MLIS, combining technology with library and information sciences.

Budget is a major concern, but there are many least expensive online masters degrees in related STEM and business areas. For experienced professionals aiming at executive leadership, a doctorate organizational leadership online equips graduates to guide organizations through digital transformation.

These pathways allow Computer Science students to diversify their skillsets and pursue dynamic careers across tech, business, and information management.

Best Scientists Citing Julien Epps

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles