World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Scherer

Stefan Scherer

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8970
World Ranking
8278
National Ranking
3548

Stefan Scherer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Scherer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stefan Scherer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Scherer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Scherer is affiliated with Meta in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the arts and humanities, with a focus on literature, social psychology, clinical psychology, education, and artificial intelligence.

The main fields of study in which Scherer has contributed include:

  • Arts and Humanities

Within these fields, the scientist has worked in several subfields such as:

  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Artificial Intelligence

Scherer's research topics include:

  • German Literature and Culture Studies
  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • European History and Politics
  • German History and Society
  • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
  • Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research

Their recent publications are diverse, covering both clinical and technological applications as well as social and emotional skill development. Key papers include:

  • Convolutional Neural Network Models for Automatic Preoperative Severity Assessment in Unilateral Cleft Lip (2021), Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  • Training public speaking with virtual social interactions: effectiveness of real-time feedback and delayed feedback (2021), Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
  • Social and Emotional Skills Training with Embodied Moxie (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Multimodal Analysis and Assessment of Therapist Empathy in Motivational Interviews (2023), INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION
  • Machine learning for semi-automated scoping reviews (2023), Intelligent Systems with Applications

Frequent publication venues for Scherer's work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION
  • Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
  • Intelligent Systems with Applications

Their frequent coauthors reflect collaboration across different disciplines and include:

  • Sharon Mozgai
  • Cari Kaurloto
  • Jade Winn
  • Andrew M. Leeds
  • Dirk Heylen

Best Publications

  • A review of depression and suicide risk assessment using speech analysis

    Nicholas Cummins;Stefan Scherer;Jarek Krajewski;Sebastian Schnieder

  • COVAREP — A collaborative voice analysis repository for speech technologies

    Gilles Degottex;John Kane;Thomas Drugman;Tuomo Raitio

  • AVEC 2016: Depression, Mood, and Emotion Recognition Workshop and Challenge

    Michel Valstar;Jonathan Gratch;Björn Schuller;Fabien Ringeval

  • SimSensei kiosk: a virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support

    David DeVault;Ron Artstein;Grace Benn;Teresa Dey

  • The Distress Analysis Interview Corpus of human and computer interviews

    Jonathan Gratch;Ron Artstein;Gale Lucas;Giota stratou

  • AVEC 2017: Real-life Depression, and Affect Recognition Workshop and Challenge

    Fabien Ringeval;Björn Schuller;Michel Valstar;Jonathan Gratch

  • Virtual character performance from speech

    Stacy Marsella;Yuyu Xu;Margaux Lhommet;Andrew Feng

  • Cicero - Towards a Multimodal Virtual Audience Platform for Public Speaking Training

    Ligia Maria Batrinca;Giota Stratou;Ari Shapiro;Louis-Philippe Morency

  • Affect-LM: A Neural Language Model for Customizable Affective Text Generation

    Sayan Ghosh;Mathieu Chollet;Eugene Laksana;Louis Philippe Morency

  • Multiple classifier systems for the classificatio of audio-visual emotional states

    Michael Glodek;Stephan Tschechne;Georg Layher;Martin Schels

  • Automatic behavior descriptors for psychological disorder analysis

    Stefan Scherer;Giota Stratou;Marwa Mahmoud;Jill Boberg

  • Investigating Voice Quality as a Speaker-Independent Indicator of Depression and PTSD

    Stefan Scherer;Giota Stratou;Jonathan Gratch;Louis-Philippe Morency

  • Exploring feedback strategies to improve public speaking: an interactive virtual audience framework

    Mathieu Chollet;Torsten Wörtwein;Louis-Philippe Morency;Ari Shapiro

  • Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction

    Céline De Looze;Stefan Scherer;Brian Vaughan;Nick Campbell

  • Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression and PTSD Are Associated with Reduced Vowel Space in Screening Interviews

    Stefan Scherer;Gale M. Lucas;Jonathan Gratch;Albert Skip Rizzo

  • Representation Learning for Speech Emotion Recognition

    Sayan Ghosh;Eugene Laksana;Louis-Philippe Morency;Stefan Scherer

  • A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying the Thought Markers of Suicidal Subjects: A Prospective Multicenter Trial

    John P. Pestian;Michael Sorter;Brian Connolly;Kevin Bretonnel Cohen

  • Automatic audiovisual behavior descriptors for psychological disorder analysis

    Stefan Scherer;Giota Stratou;Gale M. Lucas;Marwa Mahmoud;Marwa Mahmoud

  • Learning representations of emotional speech with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks

    Jonathan Chang;Stefan Scherer

  • Multimodal Public Speaking Performance Assessment

    Torsten Wörtwein;Mathieu Chollet;Boris Schauerte;Louis-Philippe Morency

  • Investigating fuzzy-input fuzzy-output support vector machines for robust voice quality classification

    Stefan Scherer;John Kane;Christer Gobl;Friedhelm Schwenker

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis-Philippe Morency
Louis-Philippe Morency Carnegie Mellon University
Friedhelm Schwenker
Friedhelm Schwenker University of Ulm
Jonathan Gratch
Jonathan Gratch University of Southern California
Albert Rizzo
Albert Rizzo University of Southern California
Günther Palm
Günther Palm University of Ulm
Stacy Marsella
Stacy Marsella Northeastern University
Nick Campbell
Nick Campbell Trinity College Dublin
David Traum
David Traum University of Southern California
Heiko Neumann
Heiko Neumann University of Ulm
Jeffrey F. Cohn
Jeffrey F. Cohn University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise beyond Computer Science can open up diverse career pathways. For those interested in advanced sciences, pursuing the best online physics degree options can offer a strong foundation in analytical thinking and problem-solving.

The demand for professionals with data analysis skills continues to rise. Many prospective students look for what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to break into this field without incurring heavy student debt. Affordable and flexible online programs make it possible to gain these in-demand skills.

Engineering is another highly sought-after discipline. Accredited programs now allow students to complete their studies remotely. If you’re considering a tech-focused engineering path, look for accredited online electrical engineering programs to ensure a quality educational experience.

Finally, advancing your career or boosting your qualifications can sometimes be achieved quickly. Earning easy certifications to get online can help you gain valuable credentials and open new job opportunities in the technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Scherer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles