World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5275
World Ranking
13491
National Ranking
48

Nick Campbell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Campbell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 244 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nick Campbell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick Campbell is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland. Their research spans the fields of Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular attention to subfields such as Signal Processing, Cancer Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis

Notable recent papers by Nick Campbell include:

  • "An Active Data Representation of Videos for Automatic Scoring of Oral Presentation Delivery Skills and Feedback Generation" (2020), published in Frontiers in Computer Science
  • "Programmed Death Ligand-1 Combined Positive Score Concordance and Interrater Reliability in Primary Tumors and Synchronous Lymph Node Metastases in Resected Cases of p16+ Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma" (2022), published in Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • "Data_Sheet_1_An Active Data Representation of Videos for Automatic Scoring of Oral Presentation Delivery Skills and Feedback Generation.PDF." (2020), published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "Two efforts towards natural speech synthesis: Incorporating disfluency and speaking style change based on the interlocutor" (2023), published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "tRNA, yRNA, and rRNA fragment excisions do not involve canonical microRNA biogenesis machinery" (2024), published in PubMed

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Nick Campbell include:

  • Fasih Haider
  • Maria Koutsombogera
  • Owen Conlan
  • Carl Vogel
  • Saturnino Luz

The venues where Campbell's research has been published reflect diverse interdisciplinary interests and include:

  • Frontiers in Computer Science
  • Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • PubMed

Best Publications

  • Emotional speech: towards a new generation of databases

    Ellen Douglas-Cowie;Nick Campbell;Roddy Cowie;Peter Roach

  • Concatenation of speech segments by use of a speech synthesizer

    Nick Campbell;Andrew Hunt

  • A corpus-based speech synthesis system with emotion

    Akemi Iida;Nick Campbell;Fumito Higuchi;Michiaki Yasumura

  • Optimising selection of units from speech databases for concatenative synthesis.

    Alan W Black;Nick Campbell

  • Prosody and the Selection of Source Units for Concatenative Synthesis

    Nick Campbell;Alan W. Black

  • Doubly-Attentive Decoder for Multi-modal Neural Machine Translation

    Iacer Calixto;Qun Liu;Nick Campbell

  • DATABASES OF EMOTIONAL SPEECH

    Nick Campbell

  • VOICE PROCESSOR AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE PROCESSOR

    Nick Campbell

  • Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction

    Céline De Looze;Stefan Scherer;Brian Vaughan;Nick Campbell

  • Non-audible murmur recognition input interface using stethoscopic microphone attached to the skin

    Y. Nakajima;H. Kashioka;K. Shikano;N. Campbell

  • Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony

    Anna Esposito;Nick Campbell;Carl Vogel;Amir Hussain

  • A Speech Synthesis System with Emotion for Assisting Communication

    Akemi Iida;Nick Campbell;Soichiro Iga;Fumito Higuchi

  • Non-Audible Murmur (NAM) Recognition

    Yoshitaka Nakajima;Hideki Kashioka;Nick Campbell;Kiyohiro Shikano

  • A Japanese-to-English speech translation system: ATR-MATRIX.

    Toshiyuki Takezawa;Tsuyoshi Morimoto;Yoshinori Sagisaka;Nick Campbell

  • D64: a corpus of richly recorded conversational interaction

    Catharine Oertel;Fred Cummins;Jens Edlund;Petra Wagner

  • Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in speech

    Nick Campbell

  • On the use of nonverbal speech sounds in human communication

    Nick Campbell

  • Computing PROSODY: Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech

    Yoshinori Sagisaka;Nick Campbell;Norio Higuchi

  • EVALUATION OF CROSS-LANGUAGE VOICE CONVERSION BASED ON GMM AND STRAIGHT

    Mikiko Mashimo;Tomoki Toda;Kiyohiro Shikano;Nick Campbell

  • Investigating the use of Non-verbal Cues in Human-Robot Interaction with a Nao robot

    JingGuang Han;Nick Campbell;Kristiina Jokinen;Graham Wilcock

  • No laughing matter.

    Nick Campbell;Hideki Kashioka;Ryo Ohara

  • Spotting laughter in natural multiparty conversations: A comparison of automatic online and offline approaches using audiovisual data

    Stefan Scherer;Michael Glodek;Friedhelm Schwenker;Nick Campbell

  • D64: A corpus of richly recorded conversational interaction

    Catharine Oertel;Fred Cummins;Nick Campbell;Jens Edlund

  • Incorporating Global Visual Features into Attention-Based Neural Machine Translation

    Iacer Calixto;Qun Liu;Nick Campbell

  • Timing in Speech: A Multi-Level Process

    Nick Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Kiyohiro Shikano
Kiyohiro Shikano Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Gareth J. F. Jones
Gareth J. F. Jones Dublin City University
Qun Liu
Qun Liu Huawei Technologies (China)
Tomoki Toda
Tomoki Toda Nagoya University
Günther Palm
Günther Palm University of Ulm
Amir Hussain
Amir Hussain Edinburgh Napier University
Friedhelm Schwenker
Friedhelm Schwenker University of Ulm
David Traum
David Traum University of Southern California
Roddy Cowie
Roddy Cowie Queen's University Belfast

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in the USA can greatly expand your career choices—especially in fields like Computer Science. For those just starting out, an online associate degree offers a flexible entry point and can be completed in as little as two years.

Many students are concerned about costs. Luckily, there are cheap online colleges that provide accredited programs without the hefty tuition fees. These schools make higher education more accessible and affordable for learners from diverse backgrounds.

If your GPA is a concern, you still have options. Many online graduate schools with low gpa requirements offer advanced degrees to students who may not meet traditional admission criteria. This opens doors to earning master’s degrees and more, even if your undergraduate record wasn’t perfect.

Finally, a Computer Science degree can lead to a wide array of careers—including roles in tech, business, and research. For inspiration, see what opportunities await graduates with similar backgrounds, like those outlined in this guide to what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles