World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
15282
World Ranking
9489
National Ranking
4019

Adam Cheyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Cheyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Adam Cheyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Cheyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Cheyer is affiliated with Project Voice Capital Partners in the United States. Their work is positioned within the landscape of technology and innovation capital investment. Although information about specific research papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues is not available, their professional focus connects to developments in voice technology and related fields.

As a contributor to the field through their affiliation, Adam Cheyer engages in supporting advancements and projects aligned with voice technology, artificial intelligence, and associated areas of study. This situates them within ongoing developments concerning voice-enabled systems and emerging AI applications in communication platforms.

The absence of listed recent papers or book publications suggests their expertise might be more concentrated on applied or entrepreneurial efforts rather than academic publishing at this stage. There is no publicly noted record of awards or formal recognitions linked to their name from the data provided.

The profile of Adam Cheyer does not include detailed categories for main or subfields of study, nor specific topics of work in research contexts. Their professional role with Project Voice Capital Partners indicates involvement in the technology investment sector, potentially focusing on supporting innovation in voice recognition, natural language processing, or AI-driven user interfaces.

Given the provided source data, Adam Cheyer appears active in the intersection of technology development and investment facilitation, contributing to the growth of projects dedicated to advancing voice-related technologies.

Best Publications

  • Unified messaging methods and systems for communication and cooperation among distributed agents in a computing environment

    Adam J. Cheyer;David L. Martin

  • Intelligent Automated Assistant

    Thomas Robert Gruber;Adam John Cheyer;Dag Kittlaus;Didier Rene Guzzoni

  • The open agent architecture: A framework for building distributed software systems

    David L. Martin;Adam J. Cheyer;Douglas B. Moran

  • Multimodal user interfaces in the Open Agent Architecture

    Douglas B. Moran;Adam J. Cheyer;Luc E. Julia;David L. Martin

  • Method and apparatus for building an intelligent automated assistant

    Adam Cheyer;Didier Rene Guzzoni

  • Mobile navigation of network-based electronic information using spoken input

    Christine Halverson;Luc Julia;Dimitris Voutsas;Adam Cheyer

  • Using a community of distributed electronic agents to support a highly mobile, ambient computing environment

    Luc Julia;Adam Cheyer

  • Crowd sourcing information to fulfill user requests

    Thomas R. Gruber;Adam John Cheyer;Donald W. Pitschel

  • System, method, and article of manufacture for agent-based navigation in a speech-based data navigation system

    Christine Halverson;Luc Julia;Dimitris Voutsas;Adam Cheyer

  • Multimodal Maps: An Agent-Based Approach

    Adam Cheyer;Luc Julia

  • Intent deduction based on previous user interactions with voice assistant

    Adam John Cheyer;Didier Rene Guzzoni;Thomas Robert Gruber;Christopher Dean Brigham

  • The Open Agent Architecture

    Adam Cheyer;David Martin

  • Active input elicitation by intelligent automated assistant

    Thomas Robert Gruber;Adam John Cheyer;Didier Rene Guzzoni;Christopher Dean Brigham

  • Accessing network-based electronic information through scripted online interfaces using spoken natural language input

    Adam Cheyer;Luc Julia;Dimitris Voutsas

  • Personalized vocabulary for digital assistant

    Thomas Robert Gruber;Adam John Cheyer;Didier Rene Guzzoni;Harry Chen

  • Method and apparatus for searching using an active ontology

    Adam Cheyer

  • Determining User Intent Based on Ontologies of Domains

    Adam John Cheyer;Christopher Dean Brigham;Didier Rene Guzzoni

  • Service orchestration for intelligent automated assistant

    Adam John Cheyer;Didier Rene Guzzoni;Thomas Robert Gruber;Christopher Dean Brigham

  • Paraphrasing of user requests and results by automated digital assistant

    Thomas Robert Gruber;Harry Joseph Saddler;Adam John Cheyer;Dag Kittlaus

  • Many Robots Make Short Work

    D. Guzzoni;K. Konolige;A. Cheyer;L. Julia

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Gruber
Thomas R. Gruber Austrian Institute of Technology
Kurt Konolige
Kurt Konolige Google (United States)
Larry P. Heck
Larry P. Heck Georgia Institute of Technology
Tom M. Mitchell
Tom M. Mitchell Carnegie Mellon University
Jerry R. Hobbs
Jerry R. Hobbs University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a variety of online learning options and career pathways. Whether you are just starting out or looking to upgrade your skills, there are flexible degree programs for everyone. For students concerned about past performance, there are online schools that accept low gpa, making it possible to pursue quality education despite lower academic scores.

Accelerated options are also available; those seeking to fast-track their careers can consider a 1 year computer science degree online. These intensive programs allow students to quickly gain the skills needed for high-demand tech jobs.

Career outcomes for computer science graduates are diverse. If you're passionate about sustainability, you might be interested in positions described in what can you do with an environmental science major. Alternatively, combining technical expertise with environmental interests, you can explore the environmental engineering degree for a future in green technology and sustainable solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Cheyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles