World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
12214
World Ranking
7793
National Ranking
3373

Martin T. King publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin T. King sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 72 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin T. King D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin T. King sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Software
  • The Internet
  • Database

Martin T. King mainly investigates Information retrieval, Mobile device, Speech recognition, Word and Selection. The concepts of his Information retrieval study are interwoven with issues in World Wide Web and Text entry. Martin T. King regularly ties together related areas like Identifier in his World Wide Web studies.

His Mobile device research includes elements of Computer graphics and Facility information model. His Speech recognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Interpretation and Punctuation. He integrates many fields, such as Vocabulary, Natural language processing, Artificial intelligence, Ambiguity, Set and Object, in his works.

His most cited work include:

  • Reduced keyboard disambiguating system (761 citations)
  • Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer (552 citations)
  • Capture and display of annotations in paper and electronic documents (454 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Information retrieval, World Wide Web, Mobile device, Artificial intelligence and Speech recognition. His specific area of interest is Information retrieval, where Martin T. King studies Electronic document. His work in the fields of World Wide Web, such as Digital content, overlaps with other areas such as Software, Data structure and Index.

His study in Mobile device is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Mode, Automatic identification and data capture, Computer graphics and Orientation. The various areas that Martin T. King examines in his Artificial intelligence study include Pattern recognition, Computer vision and Natural language processing. Martin T. King incorporates Speech recognition and Selection in his studies.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Information retrieval (40.85%)
  • World Wide Web (22.54%)
  • Mobile device (22.54%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2016)?

  • Mobile device (22.54%)
  • Information retrieval (40.85%)
  • Context (7.04%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Mobile device, Information retrieval, Context, Database and World Wide Web. His work deals with themes such as Computer graphics, Mode, Orientation, Image and Scanner, which intersect with Mobile device. His studies deal with areas such as Timestamp, Computer hardware and Gesture as well as Scanner.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Index and Text entry in addition to Information retrieval. His work on Digital content as part of general World Wide Web research is frequently linked to Software and Advertising, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Object research includes themes of Character, Punctuation and Natural language processing.

Between 2009 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • Automatically providing content associated with captured information, such as information captured in real-time (423 citations)
  • Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device (413 citations)
  • Automatically capturing information such as capturing information using a document-aware device (175 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Software
  • The Internet
  • Artificial intelligence

His primary areas of investigation include Information retrieval, Mobile device, Action, Fact checking and Computer graphics. In his papers, Martin T. King integrates diverse fields, such as Action, Speech recognition, Sequence, Information capture and Mode. Martin T. King integrates many fields in his works, including Fact checking, Dynamic display, Content, Text entry and Object.

His Computer graphics research incorporates themes from Orientation, Scanner, Computer vision and Artificial intelligence.

Best Publications

  • Reduced keyboard disambiguating system

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;Cheryl Arlene Grunbock

  • AMBIGUITY ELIMINATION SYSTEM WITH DOWNSIZED KEYBOARD

    King Martin T;Grouver Dehjl L;Kashler Klifford A;Granbok Cheril A

  • Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer

    Dale L. Grover;Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler

  • Automatically providing content associated with captured information, such as information captured in real-time

    Martin T. King;Redwood Stephens;Claes-Fredrik Mannby;Jesse Peterson

  • Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document

    Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser

  • Adding value to a rendered document

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser

  • Method Of Executing Actions Correlated With Reproduction Document, Mobile Device And Readable Medium

    King Martin T;Stephens Redwood;Mannby Claes-Fredrik;Peterson Jesse

  • Data capture from rendered documents using handheld device

    Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser

  • Adding information or functionality to a rendered document via association with an electronic counterpart

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser

  • Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser

  • Archive of text captures from rendered documents

    Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover

  • Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document

    Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser

  • Information gathering system and method

    Martin T King;Clifford A Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover

  • Searching and accessing documents on private networks for use with captures from rendered documents

    Martin T King;Clifford A Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover

  • Content access with handheld document data capture devices

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser

  • Associating rendered advertisements with digital content

    Martin T. King;Redwood Stephens;Claes-Fredrik Mannby;Jesse Peterson

  • Determining actions involving captured information and electronic content associated with rendered documents

    Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover

  • Search Engines and Systems with Handheld Document Data Capture Devices

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser

  • Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

    Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover

  • Method and system for character recognition

    Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser

Frequent Co-Authors

Clifford A. Kushler
Clifford A. Kushler Google (United States)
Dale L. Grover
Dale L. Grover Google (United States)
James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
James Quentin Stafford-Fraser Google (United States)
Michael John Sebastian Smith
Michael John Sebastian Smith Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s important to consider various online educational routes and how they align with your career goals. Many students pursue advanced qualifications to boost career prospects, with Computer Science ranking among the best masters degree to get due to strong demand in tech-driven industries.

For those seeking a shorter path, an associate degree online in Computer Science or IT can provide job-ready skills and a quick entry into the workforce. This option is ideal for anyone looking to start a tech career or prepare for further studies.

Cost and admission requirements also play a significant role in choosing a program. There are plenty of options among the cheapest online colleges, making it possible to find quality education that fits your budget.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, don’t worry—many online schools that accept low gpa offer accessible pathways, opening doors to higher education and tech careers for students from diverse backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Martin T. King

Recently Published Articles