World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
16590
World Ranking
1805
National Ranking
914

Royce A. Levien publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Royce A. Levien sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 667 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Royce A. Levien D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Royce A. Levien sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Computer network
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Operating system

His main research concerns World Wide Web, Artificial intelligence, Multimedia, Computer vision and Computer program. His World Wide Web research incorporates themes from Fingerprint, Virtual world and Schema. His Virtual world course of study focuses on Computer security and Computer network.

His Artificial intelligence research incorporates elements of Resource, Real-time computing and Natural language processing. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Content, Control, Mobile device and Presentation. Royce A. Levien has researched Computer program in several fields, including Carry, Data mining, Network Access Device and Human–computer interaction.

His most cited work include:

  • Unmanned device interaction methods and systems (247 citations)
  • Device pairing via device to device contact (179 citations)
  • Capturing selected image objects (141 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Multimedia, Human–computer interaction, World Wide Web, Computer program and Artificial intelligence. The Multimedia study combines topics in areas such as Content, Presentation and Product. As part of his studies on Human–computer interaction, Royce A. Levien frequently links adjacent subjects like User interface.

World Wide Web is closely attributed to Virtual world in his work. While the research belongs to areas of Computer program, Royce A. Levien spends his time largely on the problem of Data mining, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Information retrieval. His Artificial intelligence study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Computer vision and Natural language processing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (16.01%)
  • Human–computer interaction (12.70%)
  • World Wide Web (11.90%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Computer network (8.73%)
  • Wearable computer (3.44%)
  • Human–computer interaction (12.70%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Computer network, Wearable computer, Human–computer interaction, World Wide Web and Subject matter. His Computer network study also includes

  • Wireless that intertwine with fields like Node,
  • Wi-Fi array that intertwine with fields like Key distribution in wireless sensor networks,
  • Payment which intersects with area such as Computer security and Modality. Royce A. Levien interconnects Computer hardware, Mobile device and Gesture in the investigation of issues within Wearable computer.

He studied Human–computer interaction and Electronic circuit that intersect with Big data. As a part of the same scientific study, Royce A. Levien usually deals with the World Wide Web, concentrating on Multimedia and frequently concerns with Content. The study incorporates disciplines such as Data provider and Product in addition to Implementation.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Supporting antenna assembly configuration network infrastructure (112 citations)
  • Techniques for processing images (76 citations)
  • Unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) coordination (65 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Computer network
  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence

Computer network, Subject matter, Human–computer interaction, Computer vision and Artificial intelligence are his primary areas of study. His research on Computer network also deals with topics like

  • Wireless that intertwine with fields like Node,
  • Vendor that connect with fields like Set, Computer security, Database and Resource. His Human–computer interaction study combines topics in areas such as Electronic circuit and Preference.

His Computer vision research includes elements of Computer program, Real-time computing, Wearable computer and Representation. His research investigates the connection between Computer program and topics such as Element that intersect with issues in Presentation. His Artificial intelligence study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Event.

Best Publications

  • Unmanned device interaction methods and systems

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Device pairing via device to device contact

    Alexander J. Cohen;Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Capturing selected image objects

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Attribute enhancement in virtual world environments

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Methods and systems for comparing media content

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Eric C. Leuthardt;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Transmitting aggregated information arising from appnet information

    Alexander J. Cohen;Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Unmanned device utilization methods and systems

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Supporting antenna assembly configuration network infrastructure

    Roderick A. Hyde;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Real-world profile data for making virtual world contacts

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Virtual credit with transferability

    Edward Jung;Royce Levien;Mark Malamud;John Rinaldo

  • Computational system and method for memory modification

    Eric C. Leuthardt;Royce A. Levien;Lowell L. Wood

  • Viewfinder for shared image device

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Resolution of virtual world revocable transfers

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Network Acquired Behavioral Fingerprint for Authentication

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

  • Virtual world interconnection technique

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Manufacturing control system

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Wireless device with an aggregate user interface for controlling other devices

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Device pairing via intermediary device

    Alexander J. Cohen;Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Physiological condition measuring device

    Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Jordin T. Kare;Eric C. Leuthardt

  • Evidence-based healthcare information management protocols

    Roderick A. Hyde;Edward K.Y. Jung;Jordin T. Kare;Eric C. Leuthardt

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Malamud
Mark A. Malamud Microsoft (United States)
Robert W. Lord
Robert W. Lord IBM (United States)
John D. Rinaldo
John D. Rinaldo SEARETE LLC
Edward K. Y. Jung
Edward K. Y. Jung Nortel (Canada)
Richard T. Lord
Richard T. Lord Microsoft (United States)
Clarence T. Tegreene
Clarence T. Tegreene Microsoft (United States)
Eric C. Leuthardt
Eric C. Leuthardt Washington University in St. Louis
Roderick A. Hyde
Roderick A. Hyde Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Victoria Y. H. Wood
Victoria Y. H. Wood Microsoft (United States)
Jordin T. Kare
Jordin T. Kare Microsoft (United States)

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide variety of career and educational options. If you're seeking short careers that pay well, many online programs now offer accelerated pathways to lucrative tech jobs. These flexible options are perfect for those looking to enter the workforce quickly.

Specialized fields like artificial intelligence are also on the rise. For advanced learners, the best online master's in artificial intelligence can offer cutting-edge skills and boost your earning potential, often in a flexible online format.

Not sure which direction to take? Researching the best degree to get can help you align your education with current job market needs. For those concerned about balancing work, life, and study, you might also consider the easiest online masters programs, which provide less intensive, yet still valuable, learning experiences.

Ultimately, the right pathway depends on your goals, timeline, and career aspirations. Take time to explore your options for the best fit.

Best Scientists Citing Royce A. Levien

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles