World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rogier A. Kievit

Rogier A. Kievit

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3862 3560 192 183 196 13556

Rogier A. Kievit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rogier A. Kievit between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rogier A. Kievit published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2020. 56 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2020. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 28 publications
2008 2025

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rogier A. Kievit: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 13
2012 5
2013 4
2014 6
2015 4
2016 10
2017 12
2018 17
2019 23
2020 41
2021 37
2022 32
2023 26
2024 28
2025 28
Total 291
Download as CSV

Rogier A. Kievit publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rogier A. Kievit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 196
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rogier A. Kievit D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rogier A. Kievit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rogier A. Kievit is affiliated with the Donders Institute in the Netherlands. Their research spans a broad range of topics within psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, focusing particularly on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and clinical psychology.

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • eLife
  • Scientific Reports
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Kievit's main fields of study are:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these fields, the principal subfields addressed in their work are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The scientist's major research topics include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Kievit, along with their publication year and venue, are:

  • Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization, 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • The Development of Academic Achievement and Cognitive Abilities: A Bidirectional Perspective, 2020, Child Development Perspectives
  • Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Annual Research Review: The transdiagnostic revolution in neurodevelopmental disorders, 2021, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media, 2022, Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rogier A. Kievit are:

  • Edward T. Bullmore
  • Kristine B. Walhovd
  • Øystein Sørensen
  • Anders M. Fjell
  • Lars Nyberg

Best Publications

  • An agenda for purely confirmatory research

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Ruud Wetzels;Denny Borsboom;Han L. J. van der Maas

  • Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain

    Nikolaus Kriegeskorte;Rogier A. Kievit;Rogier A. Kievit

  • Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena

    Verena D. Schmittmann;Angélique O.J. Cramer;Lourens J. Waldorp;Sacha Epskamp

  • Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide

    Rogier Kievit;Willem Eduard Frankenhuis;Lourens Waldorp;Denny Borsboom

  • Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications

    Rogier Andrew Kievit;Andreas M Brandmaier;Gabriel Ziegler;Anne-Laura van Harmelen

  • Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology.

    Denny Borsboom;Han L J van der Maas;Jonas Dalege;Rogier A Kievit;Rogier A Kievit

  • Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort

    Anne-Laura van Harmelen;Rogier Andrew Kievit;K Ioannidis;Sharon Ann Neufeld

  • Annual Research Review: The transdiagnostic revolution in neurodevelopmental disorders

    Duncan E. Astle;Joni Holmes;Rogier Kievit;Rogier Kievit;Susan E. Gathercole;Susan E. Gathercole

  • Friendships and Family Support Reduce Subsequent Depressive Symptoms in At-Risk Adolescents.

    Anne-Laura van Harmelen;Jenny L. Gibson;Michelle C. St Clair;Michelle C. St Clair;Matt Owens;Matt Owens

  • Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences

    Han L. J. van der Maas;Dylan Molenaar;Gunter Maris;Rogier A. Kievit

  • How are age-related differences in sleep quality associated with health outcomes? An epidemiological investigation in a UK cohort of 2406 adults

    Andrew Gadie;Meredith Shafto;Yue Leng;Rogier A Kievit

  • Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity.

    Ian Charest;Rogier A. Kievit;Taylor W. Schmitz;Diana Deca

  • Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Giorgio Ganis;J. Peter Rosenfeld;John Meixner;Rogier A. Kievit

  • The end of construct validity.

    D. Borsboom;A.O.J. Cramer;R.A. Kievit;A. Zand Scholten

  • Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.

    Jason Carpenter;Maxine T Sherman;Rogier A Kievit;Anil K Seth

  • Distinct aspects of frontal lobe structure mediate age-related differences in fluid intelligence and multitasking

    Rogier A Kievit;Simon W Davis;Daniel J Mitchell;Jason R Taylor

  • Microglial activation and tau burden predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease.

    Maura Malpetti;Rogier A Kievit;Luca Passamonti;Luca Passamonti;P Simon Jones

  • The complex neurobiology of resilient functioning after childhood maltreatment

    Konstantinos Ioannidis;Adrian Dahl Askelund;Rogier A. Kievit;Anne-Laura van Harmelen

  • Individual variations in ‘brain age’ relate to early-life factors more than to longitudinal brain change

    Didac Vidal-Pineiro;Yunpeng Wang;Stine K Krogsrud;Inge K Amlien

  • The two disciplines of scientific psychology, or: the disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis

    Denny Borsboom;Rogier A. Kievit;Daniel Cervone;S. Brian Hood

  • How are age-related difference in sleep quality associated with health outcomes? An epidemiological investigation in a UK cohort of 2406 adults

    Andrew Gadie;Meredith Shafto;Yue Leng;Cam-CAN

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristine B. Walhovd
Kristine B. Walhovd Oslo University Hospital
Anders M. Fjell
Anders M. Fjell Oslo University Hospital
Richard N. Henson
Richard N. Henson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
James B. Rowe
James B. Rowe University of Cambridge
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Denny Borsboom
Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam
Simone Kühn
Simone Kühn Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Anne-Laura van Harmelen
Anne-Laura van Harmelen University of Cambridge
Lars Nyberg
Lars Nyberg Umeå University
René Westerhausen
René Westerhausen University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a Psychology degree in the USA, it's important to explore related online degrees and potential career pathways. Online degree programs in Psychology and Counseling can help students gain the credentials they need for a variety of rewarding roles, from school counselor to clinical therapist.

Many prospective counselors look for ways to enter the workforce quickly. Requirements vary by state, so understanding state-specific paths is crucial. For example, if you are interested in the quickest path to becoming a counselor in North Carolina or want to know the fastest way to become a counselor in North Dakota, online resources can help clarify the process.

Similarly, those seeking the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Ohio or the fastest way to become a counselor in Oklahoma will find that targeted programs and accelerated degree options may help speed up their journey.

Whether you aim for clinical roles, school-based counseling, or other applied psychology careers, online degrees make education and state licensing more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Rogier A. Kievit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles