World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 95 749 656 41 39 290 72616

Denny Borsboom publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Denny Borsboom between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Denny Borsboom published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2024. 52 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2024. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 14 publications
2001 2025

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Denny Borsboom: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 6
2003 3
2004 2
2005 8
2006 7
2007 3
2008 8
2009 6
2010 9
2011 14
2012 16
2013 21
2014 8
2015 19
2016 28
2017 26
2018 18
2019 16
2020 25
2021 31
2022 25
2023 15
2024 38
2025 14
Total 367
Download as CSV

Denny Borsboom publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denny Borsboom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 290
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Denny Borsboom D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denny Borsboom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78 95
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Denny Borsboom is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a particular focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. They have also contributed to areas intersecting with statistical and nonlinear physics, clinical psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including mental health research, functional brain connectivity studies, complex network analysis techniques, schizophrenia research and treatment, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, tryptophan and brain disorders, and cognitive science and mapping.

Among the recent publications attributed to Borsboom are:

  • Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science, 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science

Other notable publications with strong citation counts, although not first-authored by Borsboom, include:

  • Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test, 2022, Psychological Methods
  • Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data, 2022, Psychological Methods
  • Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice, 2021, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Frequent collaborators in Borsboom's research include Lourens Waldorp, Sacha Epskamp, Tessa F. Blanken, Adela-Maria Isvoranu, and Jonas M B Haslbeck.

Borsboom commonly publishes in journals such as Psychological Methods, Psychometrika, PLoS ONE, Nature Reviews Methods Primers, and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy : A tutorial paper

    Sacha Epskamp;Denny Borsboom;Eiko I. Fried

  • Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data

    Sacha Epskamp;Angélique O.J. Cramer;Lourens J. Waldorp;Verena D. Schmittmann

  • Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology

    Denny Borsboom;Angélique O.J. Cramer

  • A network theory of mental disorders.

    Denny Borsboom

  • Promoting an open research culture

    B. A. Nosek;G. Alter;G. C. Banks;D. Borsboom

  • The concept of validity

    Denny Borsboom;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;Jaap van Heerden

  • The theoretical status of latent variables

    Denny Borsboom;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;Jaap van Heerden

  • Comorbidity: a network perspective.

    Angelique O. J. Cramer;Lourens J. Waldorp;Han L. J. van der Maas;Denny Borsboom

  • Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.

    Unknown

  • Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).

    Eric–Jan Wagenmakers;Ruud Wetzels;Denny Borsboom;Han L. J. van der Maas

  • An agenda for purely confirmatory research

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Ruud Wetzels;Denny Borsboom;Han L. J. van der Maas

  • The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data.

    Sacha Epskamp;Lourens J. Waldorp;René Mõttus;Denny Borsboom

  • Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights

    Eiko I Fried;Claudia D van Borkulo;Angélique O J Cramer;Lynn Boschloo

  • Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science

    Denny Borsboom;Marie K. Deserno;Mijke Rhemtulla;Sacha Epskamp

  • State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R

    Giulio Costantini;Sacha Epskamp;Denny Borsboom;Marco Perugini

  • Association of Symptom Network Structure With the Course of Depression

    Claudia van Borkulo;Claudia van Borkulo;Lynn Boschloo;Denny Borsboom;Brenda W. J. H. Penninx

  • Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena

    Verena D. Schmittmann;Angélique O.J. Cramer;Lourens J. Waldorp;Sacha Epskamp

  • Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models

    Sacha Epskamp;Mijke Rhemtulla;Denny Borsboom

  • Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression.

    Ingrid A. van de Leemput;Marieke Wichers;Angélique O. J. Cramer;Denny Borsboom

  • A new method for constructing networks from binary data

    Claudia D van Borkulo;Denny Borsboom;Sacha Epskamp;Tessa F Blanken

  • Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Contemporary Psychometrics

    Denny Borsboom

  • The attack of the psychometricians

    Denny Borsboom

Frequent Co-Authors

Lourens J. Waldorp
Lourens J. Waldorp University of Amsterdam
Angélique O. J. Cramer
Angélique O. J. Cramer University of Amsterdam
Sacha Epskamp
Sacha Epskamp National University of Singapore
Eiko I. Fried
Eiko I. Fried Leiden University
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Han L. J. van der Maas
Han L. J. van der Maas University of Amsterdam
Conor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Marieke Wichers
Marieke Wichers Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to various fulfilling career pathways, especially in mental health support and therapy. Many students opt for online degrees, providing the flexibility to balance studies alongside work or other commitments.

A common next step for graduates is pursuing licensure as a therapist or counselor. However, how to become a licensed therapist in Anaheim may differ from other cities due to unique state requirements, coursework, and supervised clinical hours.

For example, Anchorage licensed therapist requirements focus on Alaska-specific regulations, while Arlington licensed therapist requirements are guided by Texas law.

Additionally, the steps for meeting licensed therapist requirements in Atlanta include Georgia’s own criteria for education and practical training.

Review state regulations carefully if you are considering online programs and plan to practice in a specific area. Being aware of these diverse pathways can help you make informed decisions about your psychology education and career.

Best Scientists Citing Denny Borsboom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles