World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Award Badge
Psychology
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
117
Citations
79266
World Ranking
285
National Ranking
9

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric-Jan Wagenmakers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 400 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric-Jan Wagenmakers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on mathematical approaches within the field of statistics and probability, covering areas such as statistical methods, Bayesian inference, and advanced statistical modeling.

Their work spans several subfields including:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics of Wagenmakers' research include:

  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Wagenmakers has published numerous papers in established venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Psychological Methods
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Royal Society Open Science

Notable recent papers by Wagenmakers feature collaborations with other authors and cover topics related to Bayesian analysis. Examples include:

  • The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis (2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
  • Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence (2020, Nature Neuroscience)
  • A Conceptual Introduction to Bayesian Model Averaging (2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science)
  • A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP (2020, L'Année psychologique)
  • No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

Frequent coauthors contributing to Wagenmakers' research include:

  • Alexander Ly
  • Quentin F. Gronau
  • František Bartoš
  • Alexandra Sarafoglou
  • Don van den Bergh

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • A manifesto for reproducible science

    Marcus R. Munafò;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek;Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Katherine S. Button

  • AIC model selection using Akaike weights

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Simon Farrell

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Promoting an open research culture

    B. A. Nosek;G. Alter;G. C. Banks;D. Borsboom

  • Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course

    Michael D. Lee;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Jonathon Love;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil

  • Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

    Harold Pashler;Eric–Jan Wagenmakers

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil;Alexander Ly

  • Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

    Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Felix Holzmeister;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).

    Eric–Jan Wagenmakers;Ruud Wetzels;Denny Borsboom;Han L. J. van der Maas

  • An agenda for purely confirmatory research

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Ruud Wetzels;Denny Borsboom;Han L. J. van der Maas

  • Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests

    Ruud Wetzels;Dora Matzke;Michael D. Lee;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis

    Johnny van Doorn;Don van den Bergh;Udo Böhm;Fabian Dablander

  • Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Birte U Forstmann;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff

    Rafal Bogacz;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Birte U. Forstmann;Sander Nieuwenhuis

  • JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs

    Jonathon Love;Ravi Selker;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil

  • Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results

    R. Silberzahn;E. L. Uhlmann;D. P. Martin;P. Anselmi

  • Bayesian Hypothesis Testing for Psychologists: A Tutorial on the Savage-Dickey Method.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Tom Lodewyckx;Himanshu Kuriyal;Raoul Grasman

  • Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure

    Birte U. Forstmann;Gilles Dutilh;Scott Brown;Jane Neumann

  • On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.

    Gordon D. Logan;Trisha Van Zandt;Frederick Verbruggen;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Ly
Alexander Ly Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Richard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey Cardiff University
Birte U. Forstmann
Birte U. Forstmann University of Amsterdam
Scott D. Brown
Scott D. Brown University of Newcastle Australia
Jeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder University of California, Irvine
Han L. J. van der Maas
Han L. J. van der Maas University of Amsterdam
Roger Ratcliff
Roger Ratcliff The Ohio State University
Denny Borsboom
Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam
Christopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers Cardiff University
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options and specialized career paths. One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling, with significant demand across different cities and states. If you’re considering this path, it’s important to research the specific education and certification requirements in your area, as these can vary widely.

For example, those interested in working in California can explore the Fresno substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand what is needed to practice in that region. Requirements also differ in other states—discover the substance abuse counselor requirements in Garland for a Texas perspective, or learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Gilbert, Arizona.

Lastly, for those looking at opportunities in the Phoenix metro area, read about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Glendale. Whichever city you choose, earning an online psychology degree can be the first step toward helping others and building a rewarding career in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles