World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2760 2527 1590 1421 160 30624

Jeffrey N. Rouder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey N. Rouder between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey N. Rouder published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2018. 16 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2018. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 11 publications
1992 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey N. Rouder: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 5
2001 4
2002 0
2003 2
2004 7
2005 5
2006 2
2007 2
2008 8
2009 7
2010 7
2011 7
2012 6
2013 4
2014 7
2015 12
2016 10
2017 14
2018 17
2019 16
2020 8
2021 10
2022 4
2023 7
2024 5
2025 11
Total 193
Download as CSV

Jeffrey N. Rouder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey N. Rouder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 160
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey N. Rouder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey N. Rouder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey N. Rouder is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, general decision sciences, and artificial intelligence. The scope of their work addresses a range of topics including neural and behavioral psychology studies, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, decision-making and behavioral economics, child and animal learning development, mental health research, Bayesian modeling and causal inference, and cognitive abilities and testing.

Recent publications from Rouder include studies such as "Why many studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks may not localize correlations" (2023) in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, "Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?" (2021) in Journal of Cognition, and "Revisiting the remember-know task: Replications of Gardiner and Java (1990)" (2020) in Memory & Cognition. These papers reflect an ongoing engagement with topics related to individual differences, cognition, and experimental replication within psychological science.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rouder include Julia M. Haaf, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Martin Schnuerch, Richard D. Morey, and Barbara W. Sarnecka. The number of joint publications varies, with Haaf appearing most frequently among these partners.

Rouder's work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • Computational Brain & Behavior
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Psychological Methods
  • Journal of Mathematical Psychology
  • Behavior Research Methods

The research fields covered by Rouder encompass:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Artificial Intelligence

Main research topics include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Best Publications

  • Bayesian T Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Paul L. Speckman;Dongchu Sun;Richard D. Morey

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Paul L. Speckman;Jordan M. Province

  • Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions

    Roger Ratcliff;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Jonathon Love;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil;Alexander Ly

  • Baysefactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs

    R. D. Morey;J. N. Rouder

  • Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests

    Ruud Wetzels;Dora Matzke;Michael D. Lee;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs

    Jonathon Love;Ravi Selker;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil

  • The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals

    Richard D. Morey;Rink Hoekstra;Jeffrey N. Rouder;Michael D. Lee

  • Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses

    Richard D. Morey;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • Default Bayes Factors for Model Selection in Regression.

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey

  • Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians

    Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals

    Rink Hoekstra;Richard D. Morey;Jeffrey N. Rouder;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • An assessment, of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Nelson Cowan;Christopher E. Zwilling

  • How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Candice C. Morey;Nelson Cowan

  • An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection.

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Jun Lu

  • Bayesian analysis of factorial designs.

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Josine Verhagen;April R. Swagman

  • The philosophy of Bayes’ factors and the quantification of statistical evidence

    Richard D. Morey;Richard D. Morey;Jan-Willem Romeijn;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks

    Jeffrey N Rouder;Julia M Haaf

  • The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals

    Richard Morey;E.J. Wagenmakers;J.N. Rouder;M.D. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey Cardiff University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Paul L. Speckman
Paul L. Speckman University of Missouri
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Alexander Ly
Alexander Ly Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
David C. Geary
David C. Geary University of Missouri
Roger Ratcliff
Roger Ratcliff The Ohio State University
Zoltan Dienes
Zoltan Dienes University of Sussex
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Thomas D. Cook
Thomas D. Cook University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to various rewarding career pathways, particularly in educational settings. Many students pursue online degrees in psychology or counseling, which offer flexibility and can lead to roles such as school counselors, guidance counselors, or educational consultants.

Becoming a school counselor often requires meeting specific state-level education and certification requirements. For example, the process of becoming a school counselor in Alaska involves specialized coursework and state licensure. Similarly, becoming a school counselor in Arizona has its own unique standards, emphasizing both education and supervised experience.

If you are interested in practicing in Arkansas, it’s important to review the Arkansas school counselor certification requirements to understand the necessary steps, including relevant degrees and internship hours. Meanwhile, the California school counselor education requirements cover both academic training and state-specific exams.

Exploring online psychology or counseling programs is a smart way to prepare for these diverse career options and ensure you meet the requirements for your state of choice.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey N. Rouder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles