World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10933 10231 758 712 120 4134

Fuat Balcı publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fuat Balcı between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fuat Balcı published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 31 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 20 publications
2006 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fuat Balcı: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 3
2008 6
2009 5
2010 4
2011 8
2012 2
2013 4
2014 8
2015 9
2016 11
2017 12
2018 13
2019 14
2020 12
2021 8
2022 10
2023 12
2024 11
2025 20
Total 173
Download as CSV

Fuat Balcı publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fuat Balcı sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 120
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fuat Balcı D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fuat Balcı sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fuat Balcı is affiliated with the University of Manitoba in Canada and specializes primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their research encompasses a range of topics with a concentration on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work prominently covers the following topics:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

The subfields contributing to their research include cognitive neuroscience, which accounts for the largest share of studies, followed by experimental and cognitive psychology, statistics and probability, music, and clinical psychology.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Fuat Balcı are:

  • Tutku Öztel
  • Ezgi Gür
  • Yalçın Akın Duyan
  • Anıl Şafak Kaçar
  • Argiro Vatakis

Publications by Fuat Balcı are distributed across several venues, most notably:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Animal Cognition
  • Timing & Time Perception
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Psychological Research

Selected recent papers include:

  • The Confidence Database, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19, 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Neural Substrates of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Brain Disorders, 2022, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  • Interval timing deficits and their neurobiological correlates in aging mice, 2020, Neurobiology of Aging
  • Metric error monitoring: Another generalized mechanism for magnitude representations?, 2021, Cognition

Best Publications

  • Acquisition of decision making criteria: reward rate ultimately beats accuracy.

    Fuat Balci;Patrick Simen;Ritwik Niyogi;Andrew Saxe

  • Risk assessment in man and mouse

    Fuat Balci;David Freestone;Charles R. Gallistel

  • Chronic Administration of Infliximab (TNF-α Inhibitor) Decreases Depression and Anxiety-like Behaviour in Rat Model of Chronic Mild Stress

    Ayşe Karson;Tuğçe Demirtaş;Dilek Bayramgürler;Fuat Balcı

  • The Confidence Database

    Dobromir Rahnev;Kobe Desender;Alan Lee;William Adler

  • TNF-alpha inhibition prevents cognitive decline and maintains hippocampal BDNF levels in the unpredictable chronic mild stress rat model of depression.

    Tuğçe Demirtaş Şahin;Ayşe Karson;Fuat Balcı;Yusufhan Yazır

  • IS MATCHING INNATE

    C.R. Gallistel;Adam Philip King;Daniel Gottlieb;Fuat Balci

  • Interval timing in genetically modified mice: a simple paradigm.

    F. Balci;E. B. Papachristos;C. R. Gallistel;D. Brunner

  • Differential Bilateral Primary Motor Cortex tDCS Fails to Modulate Choice Bias and Readiness in Perceptual Decision Making.

    Esin Turkakin;Seda Akbıyık;Bihter Akyol;Ceren Gürdere

  • Timescale invariance in the pacemaker-accumulator family of timing models

    Patrick Simen;Francois Rivest;Francois Rivest;Elliot Andrew Ludvig;Fuat Balci

  • Timing Deficits in Aging and Neuropathology

    Fuat Balci;Warren H. Meck;Holly Moore;Dani Brunner

  • Acquisition of peak responding: What is learned?

    Fuat Balci;Charles R. Gallistel;Brian D. Allen;Krystal M. Frank

  • Decision processes in temporal discrimination

    Fuat Balcı;Patrick Simen

  • "Walking" through the sensory, cognitive, and temporal degradations of healthy aging.

    Nadia Paraskevoudi;Fuat Balcı;Argiro Vatakis;Argiro Vatakis

  • Optimal temporal risk assessment

    Fuat Balcı;Fuat Balcı;David Freestone;Patrick Simen;Laura deSouza

  • Motivational effects on interval timing in dopamine transporter (DAT) knockdown mice.

    Fuat Balci;Elliot Andrew Ludvig;Ron Abner;Xiaoxi Zhuang

  • Cross-domain transfer of quantitative discriminations: is it all a matter of proportion?

    Fuat Balci;Charles R. Gallistel

  • Pharmacological manipulations of interval timing using the peak procedure in male C3H mice

    Fuat Balci;Elliot Andrew Ludvig;Jacqueline M. Gibson;Brian D. Allen

  • Speed Accuracy Trade-off under Response Deadlines☆

    Hakan Karşılar;Patrick Simen;Samantha Papadakis;Fuat Balcı

  • Epistasis effects of dopamine genes on interval timing and reward magnitude in humans.

    Fuat Balcı;Martin Wiener;Bilgehan Çavdaroğlu;H. Branch Coslett

  • Are you early or late?: Temporal error monitoring.

    Başak Akdoğan;Fuat Balcı

  • Interval Timing, Dopamine, and Motivation

    Fuat Balcı

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles R. Gallistel
Charles R. Gallistel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Philip Holmes
Philip Holmes Princeton University
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
David Soto
David Soto Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Richard E. Brown
Richard E. Brown Dalhousie University
Daniel M. Merfeld
Daniel M. Merfeld The Ohio State University
Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack Maastricht University
Raul R. Gainetdinov
Raul R. Gainetdinov Saint Petersburg State University
Russell M. Church
Russell M. Church Brown University
Simon Grondin
Simon Grondin Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a variety of related fields, especially social work. A growing number of students are choosing online degrees for the flexibility they offer and the broad career options they unlock. Accredited online social work programs can prepare you for roles in mental health, counseling, advocacy, and community support.

If you’re considering further study in this area, take a look at the top online social work degrees in Massachusetts, which feature programs known for their quality and strong licensure outcomes. You might also be interested in the best online social work programs in the Northeast, offering diverse specializations and flexible learning formats.

For students based in New Hampshire, the best online social work degrees in New Hampshire are well-regarded for regional networking opportunities and field placements. Meanwhile, the best online social work degrees in Ohio provide affordable options with a strong emphasis on practical experience and career support.

Whether you pursue psychology or social work, these online degrees are valuable pathways to rewarding, in-demand careers that make a difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Fuat Balcı

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles