World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 116 304 263 49 42 365 62207

Andrew W. Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew W. Young between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew W. Young published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 1997. 8 of the 398 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 1997. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 14 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1976 2025

398 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew W. Young: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 4
1981 7
1982 2
1983 3
1984 3
1985 6
1986 10
1987 14
1988 6
1989 9
1990 10
1991 12
1992 10
1993 9
1994 9
1995 5
1996 12
1997 21
1998 16
1999 7
2000 12
2001 5
2002 9
2003 10
2004 7
2005 6
2006 6
2007 1
2008 9
2009 2
2010 8
2011 5
2012 9
2013 12
2014 12
2015 10
2016 17
2017 11
2018 12
2019 10
2020 9
2021 7
2022 4
2023 17
2024 3
2025 5
Total 398
Download as CSV

Andrew W. Young publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew W. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–370 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 365 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71 365
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew W. Young D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew W. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31 116
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Andrew W. Young is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with focused work in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics, including Face Recognition and Perception, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Face Recognition and Analysis, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology, and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis.

Frequent publication venues for Andrew W. Young include the British Journal of Psychology with four publications, Cognition with three, Cognition & Emotion and Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology each with two, and Trends in Cognitive Sciences with one.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Andrew W. Young include:

  • Face and Voice Perception: Understanding Commonalities and Differences, 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Understanding trait impressions from faces, 2022, British Journal of Psychology
  • Emotion recognition ability: Evidence for a supramodal factor and its links to social cognition, 2020, Cognition
  • Familiarity is familiarity is familiarity: Event-related brain potentials reveal qualitatively similar representations of personally familiar and famous faces, 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Detecting a viewer's familiarity with a face: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and classifier analyses, 2021, Psychophysiology

Frequent coauthors include A. Mike Burton, Holger Wiese, Clare Sutherland, Hannah L. Connolly, and Gary J. Lewis. Collaborative efforts with these researchers have contributed to multiple publications within the overlapping research domains.

Best Publications

  • Understanding face recognition

    Vicki Bruce;Andy Young

  • A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions

    J. S. Morris;C. D. Frith;D. I. Perrett;D. Rowland

  • A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;C Senior;Michael Brammer

  • Configurational Information in Face Perception

    Andrew W Young;Deborah Hellawell;Dennis C Hay

  • A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions

    J. S. Morris;K. J. Friston;C. Buchel;C. D. Frith

  • Neuropsychology of fear and loathing.

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew David Lawrence;Andrew W. Young

  • Human Cognitive Neuropsychology

    Andrew W. Ellis;Andrew W. Young

  • Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage.

    R Adolphs;D Tranel;S Hamann;A.W Young

  • Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew W. Young

  • Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury.

    Andrew J. Calder;Jill Keane;Facundo Manes;Nagui Antoun

  • Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;Sarah Scott;A J Calder

  • Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays.

    Anthony P Atkinson;Winand H Dittrich;Andrew J Gemmell;Andrew W Young

  • In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception

    Vicki Bruce;Andrew W. Young

  • Impaired auditory recognition of fear and anger following bilateral amygdala lesions

    Sophie K. Scott;Andrew W. Young;Andrew J. Calder;Deborah J. Hellawell

  • Configural information in facial expression perception.

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew W. Young;Jill Keane;Michael Dean

  • A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder.

    Simon Surguladze;Michael J. Brammer;Paul Keedwell;Vincent Giampietro

  • Accounting for delusional misidentifications.

    Hadyn D. Ellis;Andrew W. Young

  • Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition

    Andrew W. Young;Duncan Rowland;Andrew J. Calder;Nancy L. Etcoff

  • Recognition accuracy and response bias to happy and sad facial expressions in patients with major depression.

    Simon A. Surguladze;Andrew W. Young;Carl Senior;Gildas Brébion

  • Loss of disgust. Perception of faces and emotions in Huntington's disease.

    Reiner Sprengelmeyer;Andrew W. Young;Andrew J. Calder;Anke Karnat

  • Aspects of face processing

    Hadyn D. Ellis;Malcolm A. Jeeves;Freda Newcombe;Andy Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Ellis
Andrew W. Ellis University of York
Timothy J. Andrews
Timothy J. Andrews University of York
Andrew J. Calder
Andrew J. Calder University of Cambridge
A. Mike Burton
A. Mike Burton University of York
Hadyn D. Ellis
Hadyn D. Ellis Cardiff University
Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips University of Pittsburgh
Edward H.F. de Haan
Edward H.F. de Haan Radboud University
Freda Newcombe
Freda Newcombe University of Oxford
David I. Perrett
David I. Perrett University of St Andrews
Michael Brammer
Michael Brammer King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a range of online education options and career pathways, including the opportunity to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The BCBA role is in high demand and focuses on behavior assessment and intervention, which can make a significant impact in educational, healthcare, and community settings.

Before pursuing this pathway, it’s important to understand the certification process and local requirements. For instance, those interested in the West Coast can learn about bcba certification requirements in Reno and bcba certification requirements in Sacramento. Moving east, you’ll find detailed guidance on bcba certification requirements in Richmond and, for Southern California, there’s information on bcba certification requirements in Riverside.

Graduates may also consider other psychology-related online degrees, such as Clinical Psychology, Counseling, or School Psychology. Each path features unique licensing procedures and specialized roles. Exploring these options will help you align your education with your career ambitions in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew W. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles