World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
23926
World Ranking
1507
National Ranking
175

Andrew W. Ellis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew W. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andrew W. Ellis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew W. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew W. Ellis is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, alongside Decision Sciences. Key subfields include Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Finance, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The central themes in Ellis's research focus on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Banking stability, regulation, and efficiency, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Economic theories and models, and the Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism.

Recent publications authored by Andrew W. Ellis include:

  • Equilibrium securitization with diverse beliefs, 2022, Theoretical Economics
  • Revealing Choice Bracketing, 2024, American Economic Review
  • Choice with Endogenous Categorization, 2021, The Review of Economic Studies
  • Emergency preparedness for ASF in the Americas, 2020, Bulletin de l OIE
  • Correlation concern, 2025, Journal of Economic Theory

Ellis has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Michele Piccione, Shengxing Zhang, David Freeman, Catriona M. Morrison, and Yusufcan Masatlıoĝlu.

Andrew W. Ellis's work has appeared in various notable academic venues such as Theoretical Economics, American Economic Review, The Review of Economic Studies, Bulletin de l OIE, and the Journal of Economic Theory. Their contributions cover both theoretical and applied areas, reflecting a versatile engagement with topics in economics and decision sciences.

Best Publications

  • Human Cognitive Neuropsychology

    Andrew W. Ellis;Andrew W. Young

  • Ameliorating Early Reading Failure by Integrating the Teaching of Reading and Phonological Skills: The Phonological Linkage Hypothesis

    Peter J. Hatcher;Charles Hulme;Andrew W. Ellis

  • Reading, Writing and Dyslexia: A Cognitive Analysis

    Andrew W Ellis

  • Normality and pathology in cognitive functions

    Andrew W. Ellis

  • Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables

    Catriona M. Morrison;Tameron D. Chappell;Andrew W. Ellis

  • ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION

    Catriona M. Morrison;Andrew W. Ellis

  • Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement:

    Christopher Barry;Catriona M. Morrison;Andrew W. Ellis

  • Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.

    Catriona M. Morrison;Andrew W. Ellis;Philip T. Quinlan

  • Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks.

    Andrew W. Ellis;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features

    Andrew W Young;Dennis C Hay;Kathryn H McWeeny;Brenda M Flude

  • Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval.

    Andrew W. Ellis;Catriona M. Morrison

  • The Psychology of Language and Communication

    Geoffrey Beattie;Andrew W. Ellis

  • The faces that launched a thousand slips: Everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people

    Andrew W. Young;Dennis C. Hay;Andrew W. Ellis

  • Learning to read: the role of short-term memory and phonological skills.

    Siné McDougall;Charles Hulme;Andrew Ellis;Andrew Monk

  • A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Implications for psychological models of word retrieval.

    Janice Kay;Andrew Ellis

  • Naming in semantic dementia—what matters?

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Kim Samantha Graham;Andrew W. Ellis;John R. Hodges

  • “Neglect dyslexia” and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords

    Andrew W. Ellis;Brenda M. Flude;Andrew W. Young

  • Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish.

    Fernando Cuetos;Andrew W. Ellis;Bernardo Alvarez

  • Loss of memory for people following temporal lobe damage.

    Andrew W. Ellis;Andrew W. Young;Edmund M. R. Critchley

  • Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision

    Catriona M. Morrison;Andrew W. Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Young
Andrew W. Young University of York
Geoffrey Beattie
Geoffrey Beattie Edge Hill University
Michal Lavidor
Michal Lavidor Bar-Ilan University
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
A. Mike Burton
A. Mike Burton University of York
Karen Sage
Karen Sage Sheffield Hallam University
Annalena Venneri
Annalena Venneri Brunel University London
Marc Brysbaert
Marc Brysbaert Ghent University
Piers L. Cornelissen
Piers L. Cornelissen Northumbria University
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When exploring your options for studying psychology in the USA, it’s important to consider the variety of online degrees and career pathways available. Many universities across the country offer respected psychology programs with flexible online formats, making it easier than ever to balance studies with work or personal commitments.

For example, the popular psychology programs in Delaware are recognized for their strong foundations in behavioral science and practical skills training. Similarly, students can benefit from the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Fort Worth, which frequently feature online tracks designed for working adults.

Looking to specific regions, the popular psychology degrees in Kent often incorporate research opportunities and clinical experiences, while the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Las Vegas open up pathways in counseling, social work, and educational psychology.

With such a diverse selection of online psychology programs, graduates can pursue roles in mental health, education, business, and research, tailoring their career paths to their interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew W. Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles