World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3889 3587 416 396 346 12024

Annalena Venneri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annalena Venneri between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annalena Venneri published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2020. 21 of the 422 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2020. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications
1992 2025

422 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annalena Venneri: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 6
1997 3
1998 7
1999 2
2000 14
2001 6
2002 12
2003 9
2004 13
2005 7
2006 6
2007 4
2008 8
2009 16
2010 9
2011 17
2012 11
2013 21
2014 20
2015 17
2016 24
2017 27
2018 22
2019 22
2020 34
2021 34
2022 7
2023 16
2024 13
2025 8
Total 422
Download as CSV

Annalena Venneri publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annalena Venneri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 346 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 346
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Annalena Venneri D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annalena Venneri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Annalena Venneri is affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Venneri has published extensively in various academic journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Current Alzheimer Research

Notable recent publications by Venneri cover diverse neuropsychiatric and neurological subjects. These include:

  • The Impact of COVID-19 Infection and Enforced Prolonged Social Isolation on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Older Adults With and Without Dementia: A Review (2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • Functional cognitive disorder: dementia's blind spot (2020, Brain)
  • Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: A Biomarker of the Future? (2021, Biomedicines)
  • Heterogeneity in Regional Damage Detected by Neuroimaging and Neuropathological Studies in Older Adults With COVID-19: A Cognitive-Neuroscience Systematic Review to Inform the Long-Term Impact of the Virus on Neurocognitive Trajectories (2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)
  • MECHANISMS OF HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA EXPLAINED BY FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE (fMRI) (2020, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis)

Research collaborations feature several frequent co-authors, indicating active interdisciplinary teamwork. These collaborators include:

  • Matteo De Marco
  • Riccardo Manca
  • D. Blackburn
  • Micaela Mitolo
  • Markus Reuber

Best Publications

  • Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample

    P. Caffarra;G. Vezzadini;F. Dieci;F. Zonato

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.

    Peita D. Bruen;Peita D. Bruen;William J. McGeown;Michael F. Shanks;Annalena Venneri;Annalena Venneri

  • Una versione abbreviata del test di Stroop: dati normativi nella popolazione italiana

    Paolo Caffarra;Giuliana Vezzadini;Francesca Dieci;Fabrizio Zonato

  • Detecting subtle spontaneous language decline in early Alzheimer's disease with a picture description task.

    K. E. Forbes-McKay;A. Venneri;A. Venneri

  • Vascular dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease - A review of endothelium-mediated mechanisms and ensuing vicious circles

    Luigi Yuri Di Marco;Annalena Venneri;Eszter Farkas;Paul C. Evans

  • Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Michela Agostini;Lorenzo Moja;Rita Banzi;Vanna Pistotti

  • Individual differences in personality traits reflect structural variance in specific brain regions.

    Simona Gardini;C. Robert Cloninger;Annalena Venneri;Annalena Venneri

  • Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity

    William J. McGeown;Giuliana Mazzoni;Annalena Venneri;Annalena Venneri;Irving Kirsch

  • Modifiable lifestyle factors in dementia: a systematic review of longitudinal observational cohort studies.

    Luigi Yuri Di Marco;Alberto Marzo;Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz;M. Arfan Ikram

  • Review: Parkinson's disease: from synaptic loss to connectome dysfunction

    Arianna Bellucci;Nicola Biagio Mercuri;Annalena Venneri;Gaia Faustini

  • The Impact of COVID-19 Infection and Enforced Prolonged Social Isolation on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Older Adults With and Without Dementia: A Review

    Riccardo Manca;Matteo De Marco;Annalena Venneri

  • The neuroanatomy of asomatognosia and somatoparaphrenia

    Todd E Feinberg;Annalena Venneri;Anna Maria Simone;Yan Fan

  • Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

    Micaela Mitolo;Annalena Venneri;Iain D. Wilkinson;Basil Sharrack

  • Functional cognitive disorder: dementia’s blind spot

    Harriet A Ball;Laura McWhirter;Clive Ballard;Rohan Bhome

  • Increased Functional Connectivity in the Default Mode Network in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Maladaptive Compensatory Mechanism Associated with Poor Semantic Memory Performance

    Simona Gardini;Annalena Venneri;Fabio Sambataro;Fernando Cuetos

  • The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Normative data for the Italian population

    Simona Anselmetti;Sara Poletti;Elena Ermoli;Margherita Bechi

  • Left mediotemporal structures mediate the retrieval of episodic autobiographical mental images.

    Simona Gardini;Cesare Cornoldi;Rossana De Beni;Annalena Venneri;Annalena Venneri

  • Cerebral blood flow and cognitive responses to rivastigmine treatment in Alzheimer's disease.

    Annalena Venneri;Michael F. Shanks;Roger T. Staff;Simon J. Pestell

  • The age of acquisition of words produced in a semantic fluency task can reliably differentiate normal from pathological age related cognitive decline.

    Katrina E. Forbes-McKay;Andrew W. Ellis;Michael F. Shanks;Annalena Venneri

  • Modified Card Sorting Test: normative data

    Paolo Caffarra;Giuliana Vezzadini;Francesca Dieci;Fabrizio Zonato

  • Upper and lower face apraxia: role of the right hemisphere.

    Ilaria Bizzozero;Deborah Costato;Sergio Della Sala;Costanza Papagno

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Reuber
Markus Reuber University of Sheffield
Paolo Frigio Nichelli
Paolo Frigio Nichelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Sergio Della Sala
Sergio Della Sala University of Edinburgh
Hilkka Soininen
Hilkka Soininen University of Eastern Finland
Alejandro F. Frangi
Alejandro F. Frangi University of Manchester
Giuliana Mazzoni
Giuliana Mazzoni Sapienza University of Rome
Hans Spinnler
Hans Spinnler University of Milan
Carlo Semenza
Carlo Semenza University of Padua
Cesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi University of Padua
Irving Kirsch
Irving Kirsch Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of career options, particularly in counseling and therapy. Many students interested in impactful, people-centered roles pursue pathways to become licensed therapists. Popular specializations include marriage and family therapy. This field is in high demand across different cities, with each location having unique requirements.

For example, if you want to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Antonio, you’ll need to meet both educational and practical experience standards tailored to Texas. Those interested in the West Coast can review the San Diego mft education requirements or see what's necessary for how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Francisco. The process can also differ slightly based on your city, such as the steps required for how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Jose.

Online psychology degrees often provide flexibility and support to help you meet these varied licensure requirements. By researching state and city-specific pathways, you can find the best route to your ideal career in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Annalena Venneri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles