World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2821 2586 24 23 180 16960
Neuroscience 65 3098 2832 57 54 191 17113

Martin Lövdén publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Lövdén between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Lövdén published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 8 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Lövdén: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 2
2007 10
2008 3
2009 8
2010 13
2011 8
2012 13
2013 17
2014 10
2015 11
2016 12
2017 8
2018 12
2019 14
2020 15
2021 10
2022 11
2023 9
2024 3
2025 5
Total 209
Download as CSV

Martin Lövdén publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Lövdén sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 180
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Lövdén D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Lövdén sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Lövdén is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden and has made contributions predominantly in the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research encompasses a variety of subfields including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, which include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Motor Control and Adaptation

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Lövdén include:

  • Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span (2020), published in Gothic.net
  • Tool use and language share syntactic processes and neural patterns in the basal ganglia (2021), published in Science
  • Timing of lifespan influences on brain and cognition (2023), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Acute increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in plasma following physical exercise relates to subsequent learning in older adults (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Immediate effects of a single session of physical exercise on cognition and cerebral blood flow: A randomized controlled study of older adults (2020), published in NeuroImage

Lövdén frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Lars Nyberg
  • Ulman Lindenberger
  • Benjamín Garzón
  • Jonna Nilsson
  • Katrine Riklund

The scientist has published repeatedly in venues such as Scientific Reports, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, Cerebral Cortex, and Neurobiology of Aging. Scientific Reports features prominently with eight publications.

Best Publications

  • Memory aging and brain maintenance

    Lars Nyberg;Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Katrine Riklund;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span.

    Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Laura Fratiglioni;M Maria Glymour;Ulman Lindenberger

  • A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity.

    Martin Lövdén;Lars Bäckman;Ulman Lindenberger;Sabine Schaefer

  • Hundred Days of Cognitive Training Enhance Broad Cognitive Abilities in Adulthood: Findings from the COGITO Study.

    Florian Schmiedek;Martin Lövdén;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning

    Johan Mårtensson;Johan Eriksson;Nils Christian Bodammer;Magnus Lindgren

  • Structural brain plasticity in adult learning and development.

    Martin Lövdén;Elisabeth Wenger;Johan Mårtensson;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Vascular hippocampal plasticity after aerobic exercise in older adults

    A. Maass;Sandra Düzel;M. Goerke;A. Becke

  • Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age.

    Martin Lövdén;Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Finding the self by losing the self: Neural correlates of ego‐dissolution under psilocybin

    Alexander V. Lebedev;Alexander V. Lebedev;Martin Lövdén;Gidon Rosenthal;Amanda Feilding

  • Relationships of peripheral IGF-1, VEGF and BDNF levels to exercise-related changes in memory, hippocampal perfusion and volumes in older adults

    Anne Maass;Anne Maass;Sandra Düzel;Tanja Brigadski;Monique Goerke

  • Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep.

    Florian Schmiedek;Andrea Hildebrandt;Martin Lövdén;Oliver Wilhelm

  • LSD-induced entropic brain activity predicts subsequent personality change.

    Alexander V. Lebedev;M. Kaelen;Martin Lövdén;Jonna Nilsson

  • Peak individual alpha frequency qualifies as a stable neurophysiological trait marker in healthy younger and older adults

    Thomas H. Grandy;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Christian Chicherio;Florian Schmiedek

  • Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age

    Martin Lövdén;Nils Christian Bodammer;Simone Kühn;Jörn Kaufmann

  • Spatial navigation training protects the hippocampus against age-related changes during early and late adulthood

    Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Sabine Schaefer;Hannes Noack;Nils Christian Bodammer

  • Individual alpha peak frequency is related to latent factors of general cognitive abilities

    Thomas H. Grandy;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Christian Chicherio;Martin Lövdén

  • Cognitive plasticity in adulthood and old age: gauging the generality of cognitive intervention effects.

    Hannes Noack;Martin Lövdén;Florian Schmiedek;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Within-person trial-to-trial variability precedes and predicts cognitive decline in old and very old age: Longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study

    Martin Lövdén;Shu-Chen Li;Yee Lee Shing;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Does Activity Engagement Protect Against Cognitive Decline in Old Age? Methodological and Analytical Considerations

    Paolo Ghisletta;Jean-François Bickel;Martin Lövdén

  • Daily Variability in Working Memory is Coupled With Negative Affect: The Role of Attention and Motivation

    Annette Brose;Florian Schmiedek;Martin Lövdén;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Revisiting the dedifferentiation hypothesis with longitudinal multi-cohort data.

    Cindy M. de Frias;Martin Lövdén;Ulman Lindenberger;Lars Göran Nilsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek Max Planck Society
Lars Bäckman
Lars Bäckman Karolinska Institute
Laura Fratiglioni
Laura Fratiglioni Karolinska Institute
Lars Nyberg
Lars Nyberg Umeå University
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Annette Brose
Annette Brose Freie Universität Berlin
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Simone Kühn
Simone Kühn Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Caroline Graff
Caroline Graff Karolinska University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding careers, especially in fields dedicated to improving mental health and community well-being. Social work is a popular pathway for psychology graduates, offering opportunities to make a direct impact.

Many aspiring professionals are turning to online education to balance their studies with work or family commitments. Choosing from the most valuable online social work programs in the US can help ensure high-quality training and better career prospects. Regionally focused options, like the most valuable online social work degree programs in Connecticut and the most valuable online social work programs in Dubuque, offer local connections and specialized coursework tailored to area needs.

Students seeking strong return on investment should explore the best value online social work programs in Indiana. These programs stand out for balancing affordability with respected training.

As the demand for skilled social workers and mental health professionals grows, online degrees are an accessible way to gain the qualifications needed for a meaningful and versatile career after studying psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Lövdén

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles