World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
8557
World Ranking
6675
National Ranking
72

Paolo Ghisletta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Ghisletta sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paolo Ghisletta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Ghisletta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Ghisletta is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and specializes in research within the field of psychology. Their work primarily covers areas including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, statistics and probability, and health.

The scientist's research spans several specific topics, in particular:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research

Paolo Ghisletta has published extensively, with frequent contributions appearing in various scientific journals. Some of the main publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychology and Aging
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development

Among their recent papers are:

  • Educational attainment does not influence brain aging, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Psychological Distress and Well-Being among Students of Health Disciplines: The Importance of Academic Satisfaction, 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Education and Income Show Heterogeneous Relationships to Lifespan Brain and Cognitive Differences Across European and US Cohorts, 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • Predicting Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Machine Learning Approach, 2020, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Relationship Between Mindfulness, Psychopathological Symptoms, and Academic Performance in University Students, 2020, Psychological Reports

Collaboration is notable in Paolo Ghisletta's research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Kristine B. Walhovd
  • Anders M. Fjell
  • David Bartrés-Faz
  • Rogier Kievit
  • Ulman Lindenberger

Best Publications

  • Trajectories of brain aging in middle-aged and older adults: Regional and individual differences

    Naftali Raz;Paolo Ghisletta;Karen M. Rodrigue;Kristen M. Kennedy

  • An Introduction to Generalized Estimating Equations and an Application to Assess Selectivity Effects in a Longitudinal Study on Very Old Individuals

    Paolo Ghisletta;Dario Spini

  • The fate of cognition in very old age: Six-year longitudinal findings in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE)

    Tania Singer;Paul Verhaeghen;Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age.

    Martin Lövdén;Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Cross-sectional age variance extraction: what's change got to do with it?

    Ulman Lindenberger;Timo von Oertzen;Paolo Ghisletta;Christopher Hertzog

  • Cognitive and sensory declines in old age: gauging the evidence for a common cause.

    Ulman Lindenberger;Paolo Ghisletta

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Does Activity Engagement Protect Against Cognitive Decline in Old Age? Methodological and Analytical Considerations

    Paolo Ghisletta;Jean-François Bickel;Martin Lövdén

  • On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.

    Christopher Hertzog;Ulman Lindenberger;Paolo Ghisletta;Timo von Oertzen

  • Age-based structural dynamics between perceptual speed and knowledge in the Berlin Aging Study: Direct evidence for ability dedifferentiation in old age

    Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Neuroanatomical Correlates of Fluid Intelligence in Healthy Adults and Persons with Vascular Risk Factors

    Naftali Raz;Ulman Lindenberger;Paolo Ghisletta;Karen M. Rodrigue

  • Evaluating the Power of Latent Growth Curve Models to Detect Individual Differences in Change

    Christopher Hertzog;Timo von Oertzen;Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Two thirds of the age-based changes in fluid and crystallized intelligence, perceptual speed, and memory in adulthood are shared

    Paolo Ghisletta;Patrick Rabbitt;Patrick Rabbitt;Mary Lunn;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Age Differences in Text Processing: The Role of Working Memory, Inhibition, and Processing Speed

    Erika Borella;Paolo Ghisletta;Anik de Ribaupierre

  • Psychological Factors Involved in Sexual Desire, Sexual Activity, and Sexual Satisfaction: A Multi-factorial Perspective.

    Alessandra Dosch;Lucien Rochat;Paolo Ghisletta;Nicolas Favez

  • Gender differences in social cognitive determinants of exercise adoption.

    Nelli Hankonen;Pilvikki Absetz;Paolo Ghisletta;Britta Renner

  • Longitudinal Cognition-Survival Relations in Old and Very Old Age 13-Year Data from the Berlin Aging Study

    Paolo Ghisletta;John J. McArdle;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Secular Changes in Late-Life Cognition and Well-Being: Towards a Long Bright Future with a Short Brisk Ending?

    Denis Gerstorf;Gizem Hülür;Johanna Drewelies;Peter Eibich

  • Cognition in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE): The first ten years

    Martin Lövdén;Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Static and dynamic longitudinal structural analyses of cognitive changes in old age.

    Paolo Ghisletta;Ulman Lindenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva
Anders M. Fjell
Anders M. Fjell Oslo University Hospital
Kristine B. Walhovd
Kristine B. Walhovd Oslo University Hospital
Patrick Rabbitt
Patrick Rabbitt University of Oxford
Naftali Raz
Naftali Raz Stony Brook University
Klaus P. Ebmeier
Klaus P. Ebmeier University of Oxford
Denis Gerstorf
Denis Gerstorf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Christopher Hertzog
Christopher Hertzog Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling can open doors to a range of rewarding career pathways, including roles in mental health counseling, school counseling, and clinical research. A major concern for many prospective students is affordability, as costs can vary significantly depending on location and institution.

Those looking for budget-friendly options might consider the affordable counseling degrees in Ohio, which provide quality education at a lower cost. Similarly, prospective students in neighboring states can explore the cheapest counseling programs in Pennsylvania.

For those interested in specific metropolitan areas, the cheapest counseling programs in Philadelphia and the cheapest counseling programs in Pittsburgh offer targeted opportunities with both online and traditional options.

Choosing the right online program involves considering accreditation, specialization areas, and career support. By comparing affordable options and flexible formats, you can find a pathway that matches your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Ghisletta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles