World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
16920
World Ranking
4630
National Ranking
2087

James J. Knierim publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Knierim sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 138 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James J. Knierim D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Knierim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James J. Knierim is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience. Their work primarily explores memory and neural mechanisms, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, zebrafish biomedical research applications, stress responses and cortisol, sleep and wakefulness research, and neural dynamics and brain function.

They have published research in several frequent venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Biology
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Knierim's research spans several subfields of neuroscience such as cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, cell biology, and behavioral neuroscience. The breadth of publications shows a particular emphasis on cognitive and cellular molecular neuroscience.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on hippocampal function and neural encoding. Notable papers include:

  • Assessments of dentate gyrus function: discoveries and debates (2023) published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
  • Parallel processing streams in the hippocampus (2020) published in Current Opinion in Neurobiology
  • Flexible encoding of objects and space in single cells of the dentate gyrus (2022) published in Current Biology
  • Heterogeneity of Age-Related Neural Hyperactivity along the CA3 Transverse Axis (2020) published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • Hippocampal Place Cells Encode Local Surface-Texture Boundaries (2020) published in Current Biology

Throughout their career, Knierim has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Noah J. Cowan
  • Ravikrishnan P. Jayakumar
  • Manu S. Madhav
  • Michela Gallagher
  • Heekyung Lee

The scope of Knierim's research highlights contributions to understanding neural circuitry related to memory and spatial representation within the hippocampus, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach that intertwines cellular neuroscience with behavioral insights.

Best Publications

  • Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey

    J. J. Knierim;D. C. van Essen

  • DECIPHERING THE HIPPOCAMPAL POLYGLOT: THE HIPPOCAMPUS AS A PATH INTEGRATION SYSTEM

    B L McNaughton;C A Barnes;J L Gerrard;K Gothard

  • Major Dissociation Between Medial and Lateral Entorhinal Input to Dorsal Hippocampus

    Eric L. Hargreaves;Geeta Rao;Geeta Rao;Inah Lee;Inah Lee;James J. Knierim;James J. Knierim

  • The hippocampus

    Unknown

  • Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability

    James J. Knierim;Hemant S. Kudrimoti;Bruce L. McNaughton

  • Integrating time from experience in the lateral entorhinal cortex

    Albert Tsao;Jørgen Sugar;Li Lu;Li Lu;Cheng Wang

  • Faculty Opinions recommendation of Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial memory.

    Unknown

  • Comparison of population coherence of place cells in hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3

    Inah Lee;D. Yoganarasimha;Geeta Rao;James J. Knierim

  • A Model of the Neural Basis of the Rat's Sense of Direction

    William E. Skaggs;James J. Knierim;Hemant S. Kudrimoti;Bruce L. McNaughton

  • CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation

    Joshua P. Neunuebel;James J. Knierim;James J. Knierim;James J. Knierim

  • Representation of non-spatial and spatial information in the lateral entorhinal cortex.

    Sachin S. Deshmukh;Sachin S. Deshmukh;James J. Knierim;James J. Knierim

  • Functional correlates of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex: objects, path integration and local–global reference frames

    James J. Knierim;Joshua P. Neunuebel;Sachin S. Deshmukh

  • Ensemble Dynamics of Hippocampal Regions CA3 and CA1

    John F. Guzowski;James J. Knierim;Edvard I. Moser

  • Influence of boundary removal on the spatial representations of the medial entorhinal cortex

    Francesco Savelli;D. Yoganarasimha;James J. Knierim

  • Interactions Between Idiothetic Cues and External Landmarks in the Control of Place Cells and Head Direction Cells

    James J. Knierim;Hemant S. Kudrimoti;Bruce L. McNaughton

  • Hippocampal place cells: Parallel input streams, subregional processing, and implications for episodic memory

    James J. Knierim;Inah Lee;Eric L. Hargreaves

  • Tracking the flow of hippocampal computation: Pattern separation, pattern completion, and attractor dynamics.

    James J. Knierim;Joshua P. Neunuebel

  • Modular and hierarchical organization of extrastriate visual cortex in the macaque monkey

    D. C. Van Essen;Daniel Felleman;E. A. DeYoe;J. Olavarria

  • A double dissociation between hippocampal subfields: differential time course of CA3 and CA1 place cells for processing changed environments.

    Inah Lee;Geeta Rao;James J Knierim

  • Spatial Representations of Granule Cells and Mossy Cells of the Dentate Gyrus.

    Douglas GoodSmith;Xiaojing Chen;Cheng Wang;Sang Hoon Kim

  • Dynamic Interactions between Local Surface Cues, Distal Landmarks, and Intrinsic Circuitry in Hippocampal Place Cells

    James J. Knierim

  • Egocentric coding of external items in the lateral entorhinal cortex

    Cheng Wang;Xiaojing Chen;Heekyung Lee;Sachin S. Deshmukh

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce L. McNaughton
Bruce L. McNaughton University of California, Irvine
Michela Gallagher
Michela Gallagher Johns Hopkins University
Noah J. Cowan
Noah J. Cowan Johns Hopkins University
Hongjun Song
Hongjun Song University of Pennsylvania
David C. Van Essen
David C. Van Essen Washington University in St. Louis
Derek A. Hamilton
Derek A. Hamilton University of New Mexico
Daniel Johnston
Daniel Johnston The University of Texas at Austin
Edvard I. Moser
Edvard I. Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Kimberly M. Christian
Kimberly M. Christian University of Pennsylvania
Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James J. Knierim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles