World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
102
Citations
40772
World Ranking
570
National Ranking
28

Wolfgang Stroebe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Stroebe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 329 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Wolfgang Stroebe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Stroebe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Psychology and Cognitive Sciences

Overview

Wolfgang Stroebe is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans central topics in social sciences and psychology, with a focus on sociology, political science, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, health, and applied psychology.

Their publication record includes contributions to several interdisciplinary fields, especially covering social and intergroup psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, behavioral health and interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, gun ownership and violence research, terrorism, counterterrorism and political violence, as well as suicide and self-harm studies.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Psychology of Violence
  • Appetite
  • Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Stroebe has coauthored extensively with researchers such as Maximilian Agostini, Jannis Kreienkamp, Georgios Abakoumkin, Edward P. Lemay, and Jocelyn J. Bélanger.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Stroebe include:

  • Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (2020), Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  • Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence (2021), PLoS ONE

Among their awards is recognition from the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2014, in the area of psychology and cognitive sciences.

Best Publications

  • Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.

    Michael Diehl;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Health outcomes of bereavement.

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Bereavement and Health: The Psychological and Physical Consequences of Partner Loss

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Margaret S. Stroebe

  • Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect.

    Michael Diehl;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Social Psychology and Health

    Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Handbook of Bereavement: Theory, Research and Intervention

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson

  • Gruppenkonflikt und Vorurteil: Entstehung und Funktion sozialer Stereotypen

    Henri Tajfel;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Introduction to Social Psychology : A European Perspective

    Miles Hewstone;Wolfgang Stroebe;Goeffrey M. Stephenson

  • How the Group Affects the Mind

    Bernard A. Nijstad;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Introduction to Social Psychology

    M. Hewstone;W Stroebe

  • The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Fritz Strack

  • The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment versus stress theory

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Margaret Stroebe;Georgios Abakoumkin;Henk Schut

  • Receiving instrumental support at work: when help is not welcome.

    Janna T Deelstra;Maria C W Peeters;Wilmar B Schaufeli;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection.

    Eric F. Rietzschel;Bernard A. Nijstad;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Who suffers more? Sex differences in health risks of the widowed.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact

    Eric F. Rietzschel;Bernard A. Nijstad;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice

    Johan C. Karremans;Wolfgang Stroebe;Jasper Claus

  • Broken hearts or broken bonds. Love and death in historical perspective.

    Margaret Stroebe;Mary M. Gergen;Kenneth J. Gergen;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: An empirical and theoretical review.

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • European Review of Social Psychology: Stroebe/Social Psychology

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Miles Hewstone

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Stroebe
Margaret Stroebe Utrecht University
Henk Schut
Henk Schut Utrecht University
Henk Aarts
Henk Aarts Utrecht University
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
Jan van den Bout
Jan van den Bout Utrecht University
Bernard A. Nijstad
Bernard A. Nijstad University of Groningen
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen Utrecht University
Robert O. Hansson
Robert O. Hansson University of Tulsa
Arie W. Kruglanski
Arie W. Kruglanski University of Maryland, College Park
John de Wit
John de Wit Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in psychology also consider related fields, such as social work, which offers diverse career pathways in human services and mental health. Earning a social work degree can provide a strong foundation for counseling, advocacy, and community-based careers, especially if you wish to work directly with individuals or families in need.

Choosing the right program is key. For those in California, the top social work programs in San Diego are recognized for their quality and practical training. Similarly, students in Washington can explore the best social work programs in Tacoma for regionally focused education.

If you’re searching for a more comprehensive view, take a look at the best social work degrees in USA, which highlights programs with strong national reputations and innovative online options. For those based in Utah, the best social work degrees in Utah offer accessible local choices tailored to regional needs.

Whether you pursue psychology or a related online degree in social work, these programs can help open doors to meaningful work and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Stroebe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles