World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5675 5269 947 881 127 6357

Esther K. Papies publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Esther K. Papies between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Esther K. Papies published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2023. 18 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Esther K. Papies: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 4
2009 2
2010 3
2011 4
2012 5
2013 4
2014 3
2015 7
2016 14
2017 14
2018 7
2019 6
2020 8
2021 19
2022 21
2023 27
2024 14
2025 17
2026 1
Total 181
Download as CSV

Esther K. Papies publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esther K. Papies sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 127 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 127
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Esther K. Papies D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esther K. Papies sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Esther K. Papies is a researcher affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focus on applied and social psychology as well as ecology and clinical psychology. This multidisciplinary approach reflects in the variety of topics covered in their research contributions.

The main topics of their work include behavioral health and interventions, agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, olfactory and sensory function studies, environmental education and sustainability, eating disorders and behaviors, animal and plant science education, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Esther K. Papies has contributed to multiple recent papers, among which are:

  • Using consumption and reward simulations to increase the appeal of plant-based foods (2020, Appetite)
  • Understanding Desire for Food and Drink: A Grounded-Cognition Approach (2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science)
  • Situating desire: Situational cues affect desire for food through eating simulations (2021, Appetite)

They have frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including Tess Davis, Amy Rodger, Maria Almudena Claassen, Lawrence W. Barsalou, and Lara Wehbe.

Among the publication venues where Esther K. Papies' work appears most often are:

  • Appetite
  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
  • Energy Research & Social Science
  • Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism

Their research contributions include a substantial number of studies related to behavioral health interventions as well as sustainability and environmental impact in agricultural contexts. In particular, their published work often examines the interplay between psychological factors and eating behaviors, including desire for food and drink and the influence of environmental and situational cues on consumption.

Best Publications

  • Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Guido M. van Koningsbruggen;Esther K. Papies;Henk Aarts

  • Mindful Attention Prevents Mindless Impulses

    Esther K. Papies;Lawrence W. Barsalou;Ruud Custers

  • Goal priming and eating behavior: enhancing self-regulation by environmental cues.

    Esther K. Papies;Petra Hamstra

  • The benefits of simply observing: mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior.

    Esther K. Papies;Tila M. Pronk;Mike Keesman;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Pleasure in the mind: Restrained eating and spontaneous hedonic thoughts about food.

    Esther K. Papies;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Aarts

  • Healthy Cognition: Processes of Self-Regulatory Success in Restrained Eating

    Esther K. Papies;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Aarts

  • The allure of forbidden food: On the role of attention in self-regulation

    Esther K. Papies;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Aarts

  • Turning a blind eye to temptation: How cognitive load can facilitate self-regulation.

    Lotte F. Van Dillen;Esther K. Papies;Wilhelm Hofmann

  • Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods.

    Harm Veling;Henk Aarts;Esther K. Papies

  • Health goal priming as a situated intervention tool : how to benefit from nonconscious motivational routes to health behaviour

    Esther K. Papies

  • Using health primes to reduce unhealthy snack purchases among overweight consumers in a grocery store

    E K Papies;I Potjes;M Keesman;S Schwinghammer

  • From Homeostatic to Hedonic Theories of Eating: Self-Regulatory Failure in Food-Rich Environments

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Esther K. Papies;Henk Aarts

  • A core eating network and its modulations underlie diverse eating phenomena.

    Jing Chen;Esther K. Papies;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • A shift in perspective: Decentering through mindful attention to imagined stressful events.

    Lauren A. M. Lebois;Lauren A. M. Lebois;Esther K. Papies;Kaundinya Gopinath;Romeo Cabanban

  • Differentiating between successful and unsuccessful dieters. Validity and reliability of the Perceived Self-Regulatory Success in Dieting Scale.

    Adrian Meule;Esther K. Papies;Andrea Kübler;Andrea Kübler

  • A brief mindfulness intervention reduces unhealthy eating when hungry, but not the portion size effect.

    David Marchiori;Esther K. Papies

  • Implementation intentions as goal primes: Boosting self-control in tempting environments

    Guido M. van Koningsbruggen;Wolfgang Stroebe;Esther K. Papies;Henk Aarts

  • Tempting food words activate eating simulations.

    Esther Katharina Papies

  • Grounding desire and motivated behavior: A theoretical framework and review of empirical evidence

    Esther K. Papies;Lawrence W. Barsalou

  • Healthy dining. Subtle diet reminders at the point of purchase increase low-calorie food choices among both chronic and current dieters.

    Esther K. Papies;Harm Veling

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk Aarts
Henk Aarts Utrecht University
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Lawrence W. Barsalou University of Glasgow
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Johan C. Karremans
Johan C. Karremans Radboud University
Paul A.M. Smeets
Paul A.M. Smeets Wageningen University & Research
Harm Veling
Harm Veling Radboud University
Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Nanne K. de Vries
Nanne K. de Vries Maastricht University
Ignace T. C. Hooge
Ignace T. C. Hooge Utrecht University
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens various online degree options and rewarding career pathways. If you want to fast-track your journey to becoming a licensed social worker, consider enrolling in the fastest msw program. These programs allow you to complete your Master of Social Work in less time, ideal for career-changers or experienced professionals.

Interested in psychology? You may benefit from an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online. These programs are designed for motivated students seeking a flexible and efficient path to graduation, opening doors to counseling, social services, and research.

For those aiming to become professional counselors, consider cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs. Accreditation ensures your degree meets high standards, and online study lets you balance school with work.

Finally, if you're interested in helping families and couples, online mft programs accredited by reputable organizations can lead to a specialized career in marriage and family therapy. Demand for trained professionals across these fields continues to grow, making now a great time to explore your options.

Best Scientists Citing Esther K. Papies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles