World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
54
Citations
16371
World Ranking
821
National Ranking
399

Joseph P. Romano publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph P. Romano sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 136 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Joseph P. Romano D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph P. Romano sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph P. Romano is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of mathematics. Their work spans several interrelated subfields including statistics and probability, sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, management science and operations research, as well as infectious diseases.

The main topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques

Among their recent publications are:

  • "The Romano-Wolf multiple-hypothesis correction in Stata" (2020), published in The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
  • "Inference for Ranks with Applications to Mobility across Neighbourhoods and Academic Achievement across Countries" (2023), published in The Review of Economic Studies
  • "Inference in Experiments With Matched Pairs" (2021), published in Journal of the American Statistical Association
  • "Exact tests via multiple data splitting" (2020), published in Statistics & Probability Letters
  • "Inference for Ranks with Applications to Mobility Across Neighborhoods and Academic Achievement Across Countries" (2020), published in SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators in their research endeavors include Azeem M. Shaikh, E. L. Lehmann, Magne Mogstad, Daniel Wilhelm, and Yuehao Bai, with collaboration counts ranging from 5 to 20 joint works.

Their work has been disseminated through multiple publication venues, with notable frequency in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Review of Economic Studies
  • Journal of Econometrics
  • Journal of Time Series Analysis

In addition to articles, Joseph P. Romano has contributed to academic literature with at least one book published by Springer International Publishing titled "Testing Statistical Hypotheses" (2022).

Best Publications

  • The stationary bootstrap

    Dimitris N. Politis;Joseph P. Romano

  • Weak convergence of dependent empirical measures with application to subsampling in function spaces

    Dimitris Politis;Joseph P. Romano;Michael Wolf

  • Stepwise multiple testing as formalized data snooping

    Joseph P. Romano;Michael Wolf

  • Large Sample Confidence Regions Based on Subsamples under Minimal Assumptions

    Dimitris N. Politis;Joseph P. Romano

  • Exact and approximate stepdown methods for multiple hypothesis testing

    Joseph P Romano;Michael Wolf

  • Empirical Likelihood is Bartlett-Correctable

    Thomas DiCiccio;Peter Hall;Joseph Romano

  • A Review of Bootstrap Confidence Intervals

    Thomas J. Diciccio;Joseph P. Romano

  • Generalizations of the familywise error rate

    E. L. Lehmann;Joseph P. Romano

  • Efficient computation of adjusted p-values for resampling-based stepdown multiple testing

    Joseph P. Romano;Michael Wolf

  • The Romano–Wolf multiple-hypothesis correction in Stata:

    Damian Clarke;Joseph P. Romano;Michael Wolf

  • Inference for identifiable parameters in partially identified econometric models

    Joseph P. Romano;Azeem M. Shaikh

  • Bootstrap and randomization tests of some nonparametric hypotheses

    Joseph P. Romano

  • EXACT AND ASYMPTOTICALLY ROBUST PERMUTATION TESTS

    Eun Yi Chung;Joseph P. Romano

  • Counterexamples in Probability and Statistics

    Joseph P. Romano;Andrew F. Siegel

  • Inference for the identified set in partially identified econometric models

    Joseph P. Romano;Azeem M. Shaikh

  • A General Resampling Scheme for Triangular Arrays of $lpha$-Mixing Random Variables with Application to the Problem of Spectral Density Estimation

    Dimitris N. Politis;Joseph P. Romano

  • Stepwise Multiple Testing as Formalized Data Snooping

    Michael Wolf;Joseph P. Romano

  • Inference for Autocorrelations under Weak Assumptions

    Joseph P. Romano;Lori A. Thombs

  • Bootstrap technology and applications

    Christian Léger;Joseph P. Romano;Dimitris N. Politis

  • On the Behavior of Randomization Tests without a Group Invariance Assumption

    Joseph P. Romano

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Wolf
Michael Wolf University of Zurich
Dimitris N. Politis
Dimitris N. Politis University of California, San Diego
Erich L. Lehmann
Erich L. Lehmann University of California, Berkeley
Tze Leung Lai
Tze Leung Lai Stanford University
Noah S. Diffenbaugh
Noah S. Diffenbaugh Stanford University
Magne Mogstad
Magne Mogstad University of Chicago
Efstathios Paparoditis
Efstathios Paparoditis University of Cyprus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates with a Mathematics degree often explore various online programs to enhance their skills or pivot to related fields. For those interested in combining analytical skills with business acumen, pursuing a masters degree in marketing offers a practical route. This path leverages data-driven strategies, which align well with a mathematical background.

Another popular option is enrolling in one of the cheapest 1 year online mba programs. These programs are designed for professionals who want to advance quickly, blending quantitative skills with leadership and management training. Additionally, many students prefer programs that are flexible; therefore, online options that accept transfer credits, such as those highlighted in online mba accepting transfer credits, can significantly shorten the time and cost commitment.

For those focused on the increasing demand for big data expertise, a masters data analytics degree is highly relevant. This program enhances capabilities in statistical analysis and computational methods, directly applicable to careers in technology, finance, and research. Exploring these related degrees can open diverse and lucrative career pathways for mathematics graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph P. Romano

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles