World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
73
Citations
17066
World Ranking
1439
National Ranking
614

Daniel M. Murphy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel M. Murphy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Daniel M. Murphy is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Planetary Science and Exploration

Daniel M. Murphy has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Geoscience
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

They have contributed to a number of scientific papers, some of the recent ones are:

  • "Global Measurements of Brown Carbon and Estimated Direct Radiative Effects", 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Widespread biomass burning smoke throughout the remote troposphere", 2020, Nature Geoscience
  • "The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere", 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Dominant role of mineral dust in cirrus cloud formation revealed by global-scale measurements", 2022, Nature Geoscience
  • "Chlorine activation and enhanced ozone depletion induced by wildfire aerosol", 2023, Nature

The scientist frequently collaborates with others in their field. Regular co-authors include:

  • Gregory P. Schill
  • K. D. Froyd
  • C. A. Brock
  • Agnieszka Kupc
  • Christina Williamson

In recognition of their contributions, Daniel M. Murphy was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation

    G. Mcfiggans;P. Artaxo;Urs Baltensperger;H. Coe

  • In Situ Measurements of Organics, Meteoritic Material, Mercury, and Other Elements in Aerosols at 5 to 19 Kilometers

    D. M. Murphy;D. S. Thomson;M. J. Mahoney

  • Aerosols, their Direct and Indirect Effects

    J. E. Penner;M. O. Andreae;H. Annegarn;L. Barrie

  • Clarifying the Dominant Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation

    Daniel J. Cziczo;Karl D. Froyd;Karl D. Froyd;Corinna Hoose;Eric J. Jensen

  • Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles

    D. M. Murphy;D. J. Cziczo;K. D. Froyd;P. K. Hudson

  • Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer

    D. M. Murphy;J. R. Anderson;P. K. Quinn;L. M. McInnes

  • In situ measurements of total reactive nitrogen, total water, and aerosol in a polar stratospheric cloud in the Antarctic

    D. W. Fahey;K. K. Kelly;G. V. Ferry;L. R. Poole

  • Observations of organic material in individual marine particles at Cape Grim during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1)

    Ann M. Middlebrook;Daniel M. Murphy;David S. Thomson

  • Reactive nitrogen and its correlation with ozone in the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere

    D. M. Murphy;D. W. Fahey;M. H. Proffitt;S. C. Liu

  • Biomass burning in Siberia and Kazakhstan as an important source for haze over the Alaskan Arctic in April 2008

    C. Warneke;C. Warneke;R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini;J. Brioude;J. Brioude;C. A. Brock

  • The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers

    Daniel M. Murphy

  • Characteristics, sources, and transport of aerosols measured in spring 2008 during the aerosol, radiation, and cloud processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) Project

    C. A. Brock;J. Cozic;J. Cozic;R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini;K. D. Froyd;K. D. Froyd

  • An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950

    D. M. Murphy;S. Solomon;R. W. Portmann;K. H. Rosenlof

  • A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics.

    Christina J. Williamson;Christina J. Williamson;Agnieszka Kupc;Agnieszka Kupc;Duncan Axisa;Kelsey R. Bilsback

  • Laser Ionization Mass Spectroscopy of Single Aerosol Particles

    D. M. Murphy;D. S. Thomson

  • Persistence of climate changes due to a range of greenhouse gases

    Susan Solomon;John S. Daniel;Todd J. Sanford;Daniel M. Murphy

  • Contribution of isoprene-derived organosulfates to free tropospheric aerosol mass

    K. D. Froyd;S. M. Murphy;D. M. Murphy;J. A. de Gouw

  • An estimate of the flux of stratospheric reactive nitrogen and ozone into the troposphere

    D. M. Murphy;D. W. Fahey

  • Deactivation of ice nuclei due to atmospherically relevant surface coatings

    Daniel J Cziczo;Daniel J Cziczo;Karl D Froyd;Karl D Froyd;Stephane J Gallavardin;Stephane J Gallavardin;Ottmar Moehler

  • Organic aerosol formation downwind from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;A. M. Middlebrook;C. Warneke;C. Warneke;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov

  • Mathematical treatment of the wall loss of a trace species in denuder and catalytic converter tubes

    Daniel M. Murphy;David W. Fahey

  • ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols

    S.C. Wofsy;S. Afshar;H.M. Allen;E.C. Apel

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl D. Froyd
Karl D. Froyd Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
David S. Thomson
David S. Thomson Original Code Consulting
Charles A. Brock
Charles A. Brock National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ann M. Middlebrook
Ann M. Middlebrook National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Joshua P. Schwarz
Joshua P. Schwarz National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Daniel A. Lack
Daniel A. Lack Earth System Research Laboratory
John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences often intersects with social sciences, making an online sociology degree bachelors a valuable complement. This combination equips students with a broader understanding of societal impacts on the environment and policy development.

For professionals looking to advance their careers without a lengthy commitment, accelerated options such as 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offer a streamlined path to doctoral credentials, ideal for those balancing work and study.

Educators and administrators interested in environmental education can explore top programs through the best eds to edd programs. These options provide flexible routes to leadership roles within academic and community settings focused on environmental issues.

Moreover, social workers aiming to impact environmental justice and community health may find opportunities in fully funded dsw programs. These programs support practitioners pursuing advanced practice without financial strain, enhancing their ability to address complex social-environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Murphy

Trending Scientists