World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 111 192 180 11 11 590 46142

Hugh Coe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hugh Coe between 1970 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hugh Coe published across 57 years, from 1970 to 2026, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2020. 45 of the 705 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2020. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 41 publications 2011: 42 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 13 publications
1970 2026

705 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hugh Coe: publications per year, 1970 to 2026
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 4
1998 1
1999 6
2000 10
2001 6
2002 5
2003 8
2004 24
2005 24
2006 8
2007 22
2008 20
2009 29
2010 41
2011 42
2012 27
2013 25
2014 28
2015 31
2016 22
2017 31
2018 35
2019 44
2020 45
2021 36
2022 25
2023 28
2024 26
2025 32
2026 13
Total 705
Download as CSV

Hugh Coe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh Coe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–590 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 590 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9 590
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Hugh Coe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh Coe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8 111
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Hugh Coe is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom and contributes extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research primarily focuses on Atmospheric Science, with a significant number of studies related to Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, as well as Global and Planetary Change.

Their main research topics include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Air Quality and Health Impacts, and Atmospheric aerosols and clouds. Additional areas of focus encompass Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, Vehicle emissions and performance, and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics.

Recent notable publications include:

  • EUREC 4 A, 2021, Earth system science data
  • Enhanced aerosol particle growth sustained by high continental chlorine emission in India, 2021, Nature Geoscience
  • An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The CLoud-Aerosol-Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Evaluating the sensitivity of radical chemistry and ozone formation to ambient VOCs and NO x in Beijing, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

They have frequently published in venues such as Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Faraday Discussions, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Atmospheric measurement techniques, and Environmental Science Atmospheres.

Hugh Coe often collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • J. D. Allan
  • Thomas J. Bannan
  • G. McFiggans
  • Michael Flynn
  • James Lee

Best Publications

  • Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere

    J. L. Jimenez;M. R. Canagaratna;N. M. Donahue;A. S. H. Prevot

  • Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes

    Q. Zhang;Jose L. Jimenez;M. R. Canagaratna;J. D. Allan

  • Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer

    M. R. Canagaratna;J. T. Jayne;J. L. Jimenez;J. D. Allan

  • Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol−cloud interactions in the climate system

    John H. Seinfeld;Christopher Bretherton;Kenneth S. Carslaw;Hugh Coe

  • The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation

    G. Mcfiggans;P. Artaxo;Urs Baltensperger;H. Coe

  • A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data

    James D Allan;Alice E Delia;Hugh Coe;Keith N Bower

  • Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry

    Qi Zhang;M. Rami Alfarra;Douglas R. Worsnop;James D. Allan

  • Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis

    James D. Allan;Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez;Paul I. Williams;M. Rami Alfarra

  • Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint on the global secondary organic aerosol budget

    D. V. Spracklen;J. L. Jimenez;K. S. Carslaw;D. R. Worsnop

  • Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate in the Lower Fraser Valley using two Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometers

    M. Rami Alfarra;Hugh Coe;James D. Allan;Keith N. Bower

  • Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state

    Dantong Liu;James Whitehead;M. Rami Alfarra;Ernesto Reyes-Villegas

  • Absorptivity of brown carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions

    R. Saleh;C. J. Hennigan;G. R. McMeeking;W. K. Chuang

  • Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary organic aerosols in two UK cities

    J.D. Allan;P.I. Williams;W.T. Morgan;C.L. Martin

  • Evolution of trace gases and particles emitted by a chaparral fire in California

    Sheryl Kashi Akagi;J. S. Craven;J. W. Taylor;G. R. McMeeking;G. R. McMeeking

  • General overview: European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) - integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales

    M. Kulmala;A. Asmi;H. K. Lappalainen;H. K. Lappalainen;U. Baltensperger

  • Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2

    M. Gysel;M. Gysel;J. Crosier;D. O. Topping;J. D. Whitehead

  • Inversion of tandem differential mobility analyser (TDMA) measurements

    M. Gysel;M. Gysel;G.B. McFiggans;H. Coe

  • The VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx): goals, platforms, and field operations

    R. Wood;C. R. Mechoso;C. S. Bretherton;R. A. Weller

  • Chemical and physical transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass burning emissions in an environmental chamber

    C. J. Hennigan;M. A. Miracolo;G. J. Engelhart;A. A. May

  • A mass spectrometric study of secondary organic aerosols formed from the photooxidation of anthropogenic and biogenic precursors in a reaction chamber

    M. R. Alfarra;M. R. Alfarra;D. Paulsen;D. Paulsen;M. Gysel;M. Gysel;A. A. Garforth

  • Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft measurements of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission ratios

    Gerard Capes;Ben Johnson;G. McFiggans;P. I. Williams

  • Technical note A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data

    James D. Allan;Alice E. Delia;Hugh Coe;Keith N. Bower

  • Ubiquity and Dominance of Oxygenated Species in Organic Aerosols in

    Q. Zhang;J. L. Jimenez;H. Coe;I. Ulbrich

Frequent Co-Authors

James Allan
James Allan University of Manchester
Paul I. Williams
Paul I. Williams University of Manchester
Keith Bower
Keith Bower University of Manchester
Gordon McFiggans
Gordon McFiggans University of Manchester
Michael Flynn
Michael Flynn University of Manchester
Martin Gallagher
Martin Gallagher University of Manchester
Dantong Liu
Dantong Liu Zhejiang University
Thomas Choularton
Thomas Choularton University of Manchester
Carl J. Percival
Carl J. Percival University of Manchester
James D. Lee
James D. Lee University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Environmental Sciences opens the door to various related online degrees that can enhance your knowledge and career options. For professionals seeking advanced credentials, programs like eds to edd bridge programs online offer a flexible path to doctoral degrees, ideal for those interested in combining environmental policy with education.

Social work also intersects with environmental issues, making dsw online programs a valuable option for graduates aiming to address community and environmental health challenges through social justice frameworks.

For students balancing work and study, pursuing an affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad foundation before specializing further. Additionally, those new to higher education might consider the easiest bachelors degree options to build confidence and credits in an accessible way.

Whether aiming for advanced research, community impact, or foundational knowledge, these online pathways support diverse career trajectories within the environmental field.

Best Scientists Citing Hugh Coe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles