World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
72
Citations
17016
World Ranking
1509
National Ranking
122

Martin Gallagher publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 405 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Gallagher D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Gallagher is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable focus in Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Nephrology.

The scientist's work covers key topics such as:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Gallagher has contributed to several academic journals, frequently publishing in Atmosphere, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, The Lancet, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Selected recent publications include:

  • Sparsentan in patients with IgA nephropathy: a prespecified interim analysis from a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial, 2023, The Lancet
  • Testing the near-field Gaussian plume inversion flux quantification technique using unmanned aerial vehicle sampling, 2020, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Airborne measurements of fire emission factors for African biomass burning sampled during the MOYA campaign, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Small ice particles at slightly supercooled temperatures in tropical maritime convection, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Detection of Airborne Biological Particles in Indoor Air Using a Real-Time Advanced Morphological Parameter UV-LIF Spectrometer and Gradient Boosting Ensemble Decision Tree Classifiers, 2020, Atmosphere

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Ian Crawford (11 publications)
  • Hugh Coe (9 publications)
  • David Topping (9 publications)
  • Keith Bower (8 publications)
  • Michael Flynn (8 publications)

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions

    D. Fowler;Kim Pilegaard;M.A. Sutton;Per Ambus

  • High concentrations of biological aerosol particles and ice nuclei during and after rain

    J. A. Huffman;J. A. Huffman;A. J. Prenni;P. J. DeMott;C. Pohlker

  • Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary organic aerosols in two UK cities

    J.D. Allan;P.I. Williams;W.T. Morgan;C.L. Martin

  • Global-scale atmosphere monitoring by in-service aircraft – current achievements and future prospects of the European Research Infrastructure IAGOS

    Andreas Petzold;Valerie Thouret;Christoph Gerbig;Andreas Zahn

  • Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three different desert dust samples

    P. J. Connolly;O. Möhler;P. R. Field;H. Saathoff

  • Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer 2. Measurements of fine particulate chemical composition in two U.K. cities

    James D. Allan;M. Rami Alfarra;Keith N. Bower;Paul I. Williams

  • Field inter-comparison of eleven atmospheric ammonia measurement techniques

    K. von Bobrutzki;C. F. Braban;D. Famulari;S. K. Jones

  • Real-time sensing of bioaerosols: Review and current perspectives

    J. Alex Huffman;Anne E. Perring;Nicole J. Savage;Bernard Clot

  • Factors controlling regional differences in forest soil emission of nitrogen oxides (NO and N 2 O)

    K. Pilegaard;U. Skiba;P. Ambus;C. Beier

  • Challenges in quantifying biosphere–atmosphere exchange of nitrogen species

    M.A. Sutton;E. Nemitz;J.W Erisman;C. Beier

  • Measurements and parameterizations of small aerosol deposition velocities to grassland, arable crops, and forest: Influence of surface roughness length on deposition

    M. W. Gallagher;E. Nemitz;J. R. Dorsey;D. Fowler

  • Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime

    Dantong Liu;James D. Allan;Dominique E. Young;Hugh Coe

  • Boundary layer dynamics over London, UK, as observed using Doppler lidar during REPARTEE-II

    Janet F. Barlow;T. M. Dunbar;E. G. Nemitz;Curtis R. Wood

  • EUREC 4 A

    Bjorn Stevens;Sandrine Bony;David Farrell;Felix Ament

  • Measurements of aerosol fluxes to Speulder forest using a micrometeorological technique

    M.W. Gallagher;K.M. Beswick;J. Duyzer;H. Westrate

  • A review of measurement and modelling results of particle atmosphere–surface exchange

    Sara Pryor;M. Gallagher;H. Sievering;Søren Ejling Larsen

  • Measurements and comparison of primary biological aerosol above and below a tropical forest canopy using a dual channel fluorescence spectrometer

    A. M. Gabey;M. W. Gallagher;J. Whitehead;J. R. Dorsey

  • Nitrogen management is essential to prevent tropical oil palm plantations from causing ground-level ozone pollution

    C. N. Hewitt;A. R. MacKenzie;P. Di Carlo;C. F. Di Marco

  • Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic

    Claire L. Ryder;Franco Marenco;Jennifer K. Brooke;Victor Estelles

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics in the atmosphere of a developed megacity (London): an overview of the REPARTEE experiment and its conclusions

    R. M. Harrison;R. M. Harrison;M. Dall'Osto;M. Dall'Osto;D. C. S. Beddows;A. J. Thorpe;A. J. Thorpe

  • Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic

    H. C. Price;H. C. Price;K. J. Baustian;J. B. McQuaid;A. Blyth

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Bower
Keith Bower University of Manchester
Thomas Choularton
Thomas Choularton University of Manchester
James Dorsey
James Dorsey University of Manchester
Michael Flynn
Michael Flynn University of Manchester
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Eiko Nemitz
Eiko Nemitz UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
David Fowler
David Fowler University of Saskatchewan
Paul Connolly
Paul Connolly University of Manchester
Paul I. Williams
Paul I. Williams University of Manchester
Grant Allen
Grant Allen University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students choose to complement their scientific knowledge with skills in public policy or administration, making 1 year mpa programs a popular option for quickly gaining expertise in management within environmental organizations.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial when addressing environmental issues. Online programs such as online sociology bachelor programs provide valuable insights into human behavior and community impact, which are essential for effective environmental advocacy and policy-making.

For educators specializing in environmental topics, advancing from a master's to a doctorate can enhance career prospects. Flexible options like online ed d programs without dissertation requirement offer a streamlined path for those looking to deepen their expertise while balancing work commitments. Additionally, seamless transitions through eds to edd programs can help educators focus on environmental education leadership and research without interruption.

Exploring these related online degrees can significantly broaden your career options and prepare you to tackle pressing environmental challenges from various perspectives.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Gallagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles