World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
11325
World Ranking
2665
National Ranking
205

Thomas Choularton publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Choularton sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 306 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Thomas Choularton D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Choularton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Choularton is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Earth-Surface Processes, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, aeolian processes and effects, meteorological phenomena and simulations, climate variability and models, advanced aircraft design and technologies, and air quality and health impacts.

Choularton has contributed to several recent scientific publications. These works include:

  • EUREC 4 A (2021), published in Earth System Science Data
  • Small ice particles at slightly supercooled temperatures in tropical maritime convection (2020), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • In Situ Measurements of Cirrus Clouds on a Global Scale (2020), published in Atmosphere
  • Deep Convective Microphysics Experiment (DCMEX) coordinated aircraft and ground observations: microphysics, aerosol, and dynamics during cumulonimbus development (2024), published in Earth System Science Data
  • Multi-thermals and high concentrations of secondary ice: a modelling study of convective clouds during the Ice in Clouds Experiment - Dust (ICE-D) campaign (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Thomas Choularton include Keith Bower, Gary Lloyd, M. W. Gallagher, Alan Blyth, and Paul R. Field.

The scientist's publications have been featured primarily in the following venues:

  • Earth System Science Data
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Atmosphere
  • Faraday Discussions

Best Publications

  • Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three different desert dust samples

    P. J. Connolly;O. Möhler;P. R. Field;H. Saathoff

  • Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future

    P. R. Field;P. R. Field;R. P. Lawson;P. R. A. Brown;G. Lloyd

  • Parametrization of ice‐particle size distributions for mid‐latitude stratiform cloud

    P. R. Field;R. J. Hogan;P. R. A. Brown;A. J. Illingworth

  • Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds.

    John Latham;Philip Rasch;Chih-Chieh Chen;Laura Kettles

  • The influence of altitude on rainfall composition at great dun fell

    David Fowler;John N. Cape;Ian D. Leith;T W Choularton

  • Marine cloud brightening

    John Latham;Keith Bower;Tom Choularton;Hugh Coe

  • EUREC 4 A

    Bjorn Stevens;Sandrine Bony;David Farrell;Felix Ament

  • Measurements of aerosol fluxes to Speulder forest using a micrometeorological technique

    M.W. Gallagher;K.M. Beswick;J. Duyzer;H. Westrate

  • Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic

    Claire L. Ryder;Franco Marenco;Jennifer K. Brooke;Victor Estelles

  • Properties of embedded convection in warm‐frontal mixed‐phase cloud from aircraft and polarimetric radar

    R. J. Hogan;P. R. Field;A. J. Illingworth;R. J. Cotton

  • The Role of Precipitation in Controlling the Transition from Stratocumulus to Cumulus Clouds in a Northern Hemisphere Cold-Air Outbreak

    Steven J. Abel;Ian A. Boutle;Kirk Waite;Stuart Fox

  • Observations of ice multiplication in a weakly convective cell embedded in supercooled mid-level stratus

    J. Crosier;K. N. Bower;T. W. Choularton;Christopher D. Westbrook

  • A model of the feeder–seeder mechanism of orographic rain including stratification and wind‐drift effects

    D. J. Carruthers;T. W. Choularton

  • The Effects of Turbulent Mixing in Clouds

    M. B. Baker;R. E. Breidenthal;T. W. Choularton;J. Latham

  • Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic

    H. C. Price;H. C. Price;K. J. Baustian;J. B. McQuaid;A. Blyth

  • Calibration of the Cloud Particle Imager Probes Using Calibration Beads and Ice Crystal Analogs: The Depth of Field

    Paul J. Connolly;Michael J. Flynn;Z. Ulanowski;T. W. Choularton

  • Aerosol chemical characteristics from sampling conducted on the Island of Jeju, Korea during ACE Asia

    David Topping;Hugh Coe;Gordon McFiggans;Rachel Burgess

  • Single particle characterization of black carbon aerosols at a tropospheric alpine site in Switzerland

    D. Liu;M. Flynn;M. Gysel;A. Targino

  • Ice formation and development in aged, wintertime cumulus over the UK: observations and modelling

    Ian Crawford;Keith Bower;Thomas Choularton;Christopher Dearden

  • Canopy scale measurements of stomatal and cuticular 03 uptake by sitka spruce

    Hugh Coe;Martin Gallagher;T. W. Choularton;C. Dore

  • An improved wet deposition map of the United Kingdom incorporating the seeder—feeder effect over mountainous terrain

    A J Dore;T W Choularton;David Fowler

  • Acid deposition in the United Kingdom 1992-1994

    J.G. Irwin;G. Campbell;J.N. Cape;T.W. Choularton

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Bower
Keith Bower University of Manchester
Martin Gallagher
Martin Gallagher University of Manchester
Jonathan Crosier
Jonathan Crosier University of Manchester
Paul Connolly
Paul Connolly University of Manchester
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Michael Flynn
Michael Flynn University of Manchester
David Fowler
David Fowler University of Saskatchewan
Alan M. Blyth
Alan M. Blyth University of Leeds
Paul I. Williams
Paul I. Williams University of Manchester
James Dorsey
James Dorsey University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider pursuing an dsw online programs to specialize in social advocacy related to environmental issues, blending social work with sustainability efforts.

If you seek flexibility, an accredited affordable online general studies degree offers a broad interdisciplinary foundation while keeping costs manageable. This path can be ideal for those unsure about a narrow focus or wanting to combine environmental science with other interests.

For students concerned about workload and pace, exploring the easy bachelor's degree options may provide less intensive entry points into the field. Choosing easier degrees can help balance study with other commitments while progressing toward meaningful environmental careers.

Lastly, specializing further with an online geology degree aligns well with Environmental Sciences. It offers focused knowledge about earth processes, invaluable for environmental consulting, research, and policy-making roles.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Choularton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles