World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8048
World Ranking
6088
National Ranking
472

Alan M. Blyth publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan M. Blyth sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 222 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Alan M. Blyth D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan M. Blyth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan M. Blyth is a researcher affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant contributions to Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. Additional subfields include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Earth-Surface Processes, and Environmental Engineering.

Their research focuses on key topics such as atmospheric aerosols and clouds, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, climate variability and models, precipitation measurement and analysis, air quality and health impacts, and aeolian processes and effects.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Keith Bower, Paul R. Field, Zhiqiang Cui, John H. Marsham, and D Finney.

Key publication venues for Alan M. Blyth are:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Earth system science data
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Weather

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Alan M. Blyth include:

  • EUREC 4 A, 2021, Earth system science data
  • The CLoud-Aerosol-Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Small ice particles at slightly supercooled temperatures in tropical maritime convection, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The African SWIFT Project: Growing Science Capability to Bring about a Revolution in Weather Prediction, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Is a more physical representation of aerosol activation needed for simulations of fog?, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • Rain in Shallow Cumulus Over the Ocean: The RICO Campaign

    R. M. Rauber;B. Stevens;B. Stevens;H. T. Ochs;C. Knight

  • A Stochastic Mixing Model for Nonprecipitating Cumulus Clouds

    David J. Raymond;Alan M. Blyth

  • The Convective and Orographically Induced Precipitation Study. A Research and Development Project of the World Weather Research Program for Improving Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting in Low-Mountain Regions

    Volker Wulfmeyer;Andreas Behrendt;Hans-Stefan Bauer;Christoph Kottmeier

  • Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future

    P. R. Field;P. R. Field;R. P. Lawson;P. R. A. Brown;G. Lloyd

  • The Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study (COPS): the scientific strategy, the field phase, and research highlights

    Volker Wulfmeyer;Andreas Behrendt;Christoph Kottmeier;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • A Study of the Source of Entrained Air in Montana Cumuli

    Alan M. Blyth;William A. Cooper;Jørgen B. Jensen

  • Broadening of droplet size distributions from entrainment and mixing in a cumulus cloud

    Sonia G. Lasher-trapp;William A. Cooper;Alan M. Blyth

  • EUREC 4 A

    Bjorn Stevens;Sandrine Bony;David Farrell;Felix Ament

  • A projected decrease in lightning under climate change

    Declan L. Finney;Declan L. Finney;Ruth M. Doherty;Oliver Wild;David S. Stevenson

  • Entrainment in Cumulus Clouds

    Alan M. Blyth

  • Turbulent Mixing, Spectral Evolution and Dynamics in a Warm Cumulus Cloud

    J. B. Jensen;P. H. Austin;M. B. Baker;A. M. Blyth

  • The Convective Storm Initiation Project

    Keith A. Browning;Alan M. Blyth;Peter A. Clark;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • Observations of ice multiplication in a weakly convective cell embedded in supercooled mid-level stratus

    J. Crosier;K. N. Bower;T. W. Choularton;Christopher D. Westbrook

  • The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation interaction and forcing: year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign

    Jim M. Haywood;Jim M. Haywood;Steven J. Abel;Paul A. Barrett;Nicolas Bellouin

  • Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic

    H. C. Price;H. C. Price;K. J. Baustian;J. B. McQuaid;A. Blyth

  • Mechanisms initiating deep convection over complex terrain during COPS

    Christoph Kottmeier;Norbert Kalthoff;Christian Barthlott;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • Observation of convection initiation processes with a suite of state‐of‐the‐art research instruments during COPS IOP 8b

    A. Behrendt;S. Pal;F. Aoshima;M. Bender

  • Ice formation and development in aged, wintertime cumulus over the UK: observations and modelling

    Ian Crawford;Keith Bower;Thomas Choularton;Christopher Dearden

  • Development of ice and precipitation in New Mexican summertime cumulus clouds

    Alan M. Blyth;John Latham

  • Relationships between lightning activity and various thundercloud parameters: satellite and modelling studies

    M.B Baker;A.M Blyth;H.J Christian;J Latham

  • Extension of the Stochastic Mixing Model to Cumulonimbus Clouds

    D. J. Raymond;A. M. Blyth

  • Using cloud ice flux to parametrise large-scale lightning

    D. L. Finney;Ruth Doherty;O. Wild;H. Huntrieser

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Choularton
Thomas Choularton University of Manchester
John Latham
John Latham University of Manchester
Keith Bower
Keith Bower University of Manchester
Jonathan Crosier
Jonathan Crosier University of Manchester
Paul R. Field
Paul R. Field Met Office
Martin Gallagher
Martin Gallagher University of Manchester
Andreas Behrendt
Andreas Behrendt University of Hohenheim
John H. Marsham
John H. Marsham University of Leeds
Douglas J. Parker
Douglas J. Parker University of Leeds
Ulrich Corsmeier
Ulrich Corsmeier Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge beyond a bachelor’s in Environmental Sciences, exploring diverse online degree options can be highly beneficial. Many professionals consider progressing through eds to edd programs to deepen their expertise and open doors to leadership roles in environmental education and research.

Alternatively, pursuing interdisciplinary paths such as an online Doctorate in Social Work can complement environmental studies, especially when focusing on community impact and sustainability. It’s worth exploring the online dsw programs available for those seeking to merge environmental science with social advocacy.

For students still navigating their options, completing a more flexible or foundational degree may help. The cheapest online general studies degree programs offer affordable, broad-based education, which can be tailored to support environmental sciences interests through electives and minors.

Additionally, some learners may prefer to start with an easier path into higher education. The easiest bachelor's degree programs can offer less intensive scheduling or coursework strategies, serving as a stepping stone before specializing in environmental studies or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Alan M. Blyth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles