World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6358 5914 3452 3132 122 10515

Clayton R. Cook publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clayton R. Cook between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clayton R. Cook published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 14 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 2 publications
2004 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clayton R. Cook: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 7
2008 4
2009 3
2010 7
2011 2
2012 5
2013 2
2014 5
2015 9
2016 4
2017 7
2018 12
2019 13
2020 10
2021 16
2022 17
2023 10
2024 12
2025 2
Total 151
Download as CSV

Clayton R. Cook publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clayton R. Cook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Clayton R. Cook D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clayton R. Cook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Clayton R. Cook is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including psychology, health professions, and social sciences, with notable contributions to subfields such as general health professions, clinical psychology, education, developmental and educational psychology, and safety research.

Cook's work covers a variety of topics related to health policy implementation science, community health and development, behavioral and psychological studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, early childhood education and development, parental involvement in education, and family and disability support research.

Their recent scholarly output includes the following papers:

  • Meta-Analysis and Common Practice Elements of Universal Approaches to Improving Student-Teacher Relationships, 2020, Review of Educational Research
  • The Needs-to-Goals Gap: How informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments impact service delivery, 2021, Clinical Psychology Review
  • The Work and Social Adjustment Scale for Youth: Psychometric properties of the teacher version and evidence of contextual variability in psychosocial impairments, 2022, Psychological Assessment
  • Examining the Effects of a Brief, Group-Based Motivational Implementation Strategy on Mechanisms of Teacher Behavior Change, 2020, Prevention Science
  • Dissemination Science in School Mental Health: A Framework for Future Research, 2021, School Mental Health

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Aaron R. Lyon
  • Madeline Larson
  • Mylien T. Duong
  • Larissa M. Gaias
  • Yanchen Zhang

Clayton R. Cook regularly publishes in the following venues:

  • School Mental Health
  • Implementation Science
  • Psychology in the Schools
  • Implementation Research and Practice
  • Prevention Science

Best Publications

  • Predictors of Bullying and Victimization in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-analytic Investigation

    Clayton R. Cook;Kirk R. Williams;Nancy G. Guerra;Tia E. Kim

  • Comparability of the social skills rating system to the social skills improvement system :content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels

    Frank M. Gresham;Stephen N. Elliott;Michael J. Vance;Clayton R. Cook

  • Social Skills Training for Secondary Students With Emotional and/or Behavioral Disorders: A Review and Analysis of the Meta-Analytic Literature

    Clayton R. Cook;Frank M. Gresham;Lee Kern;Ramón B. Barreras

  • Cross-Informant Agreement for Ratings for Social Skill and Problem Behavior Ratings: An Investigation of the Social Skills Improvement System—Rating Scales

    Frank M. Gresham;Stephen N. Elliott;Clayton R. Cook;Michael J. Vance

  • Social Skills Training for Children and Youth with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Validity Considerations and Future Directions

    Frank M. Gresham;Clayton R. Cook;S. Dean Crews;Lee Kern

  • Social Skills Training for Teaching Replacement Behaviors: Remediating Acquisition Deficits in At-Risk Students

    Frank M. Gresham;Mai Bao Van;Clayton R. Cook

  • Adapting a Compilation of Implementation Strategies to Advance School-Based Implementation Research and Practice

    Clayton R. Cook;Aaron R. Lyon;Jill Locke;Thomas Waltz

  • An integrated approach to universal prevention: Independent and combined effects of PBIS and SEL on youths' mental health.

    Clayton R. Cook;Megan Frye;Tal Slemrod;Aaron R. Lyon

  • Promoting social–emotional competence: An evaluation of the elementary version of Second Step®.

    Sabina Low;Clayton R. Cook;Keith Smolkowski;Jodie Buntain-Ricklefs

  • Assessing adolescents’ positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.

    Tyler L. Renshaw;Anna C. J. Long;Clayton R. Cook

  • Assessing teachers' positive psychological functioning at work: Development and validation of the teacher subjective wellbeing questionnaire

    Tyler L. Renshaw;Anna C. J. Long;Clayton R. Cook

  • Educational Characteristics of Adolescents With Gifted Academic Intrinsic Motivation: A Longitudinal Investigation From School Entry Through Early Adulthood

    Allen W. Gottfried;Clayton R. Cook;Adele Eskeles Gottfried;Adele Eskeles Gottfried;Phillip E. Morris

  • Assessing organizational implementation context in the education sector: confirmatory factor analysis of measures of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship.

    Aaron R. Lyon;Clayton R. Cook;Eric C. Brown;Jill Locke

  • Variability in the Prevalence of Bullying and Victimization: A Cross-National and Methodological Analysis

    Clayton R. Cook;Kirk R. Williams;Nancy G. Guerra;Tia E. Kim

  • Relationships of Attention and Executive Functions to Oral Language, Reading, and Writing Skills and Systems in Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence.

    Virginia Berninger;Robert Abbott;Clayton R. Cook;William Nagy

  • A supportive beliefs intervention to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices within a multi-tiered system of supports

    Clayton R. Cook;Aaron R. Lyon;Dajana Kubergovic;Diana Browning Wright

  • Cultivating Positive Teacher–Student Relationships: Preliminary Evaluation of the Establish–Maintain–Restore (EMR) Method

    Clayton R. Cook;Susanna Coco;Yanchen Zhang;Aria E. Fiat

  • Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Tic Disorders

    Clayton R. Cook;Jan Blacher

  • The Needs-to-Goals Gap: How informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments impact service delivery.

    Unknown

  • Meta-Analysis and Common Practice Elements of Universal Approaches to Improving Student-Teacher Relationships.

    Laurie L Kincade;Clayton Cook;Annie Goerdt

  • Promoting Secondary Teachers' Well-Being and Intentions to Implement Evidence-Based Practices: Randomized Evaluation of the Achiever Resilience Curriculum.

    Clayton R. Cook;Faith G. Miller;Aria Fiat;Tyler Renshaw

  • School-Based Behavioral Assessment within Problem-Solving Models: Current Status and Future Directions

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Robert J. Volpe;Frank M. Gresham;Clayton R. Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron R. Lyon
Aaron R. Lyon University of Washington
Tyler L. Renshaw
Tyler L. Renshaw Utah State University
Frank M. Gresham
Frank M. Gresham Louisiana State University
Jill Locke
Jill Locke University of Washington
Mark G. Ehrhart
Mark G. Ehrhart University of Central Florida
Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Paula M. Barrett
Paula M. Barrett Edith Cowan University
Lee Kern
Lee Kern Lehigh University
Nancy G. Guerra
Nancy G. Guerra University of California, Irvine
Robert J. Volpe
Robert J. Volpe Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA unlocks numerous online degree options and career opportunities. Students can choose from associate, bachelor's, master's, or doctoral programs, each offering flexible online formats to fit diverse schedules and life needs.

When reviewing your options, consider the most popular psychology degree programs in America to understand national enrollment trends and specialties. If location is important, some cities stand out for their academic excellence. For example, Seattle offers a variety of robust psychology education options, as seen in the most popular psychology degree programs in Seattle. Meanwhile, the popular psychology programs in University, MS demonstrate the value of strong regional reputations and networks.

For those seeking affordability and flexibility, online programs continue to rise in quality and value. The best value online psychology programs in Philadelphia highlight how students can earn respected credentials without relocating or incurring high costs.

Graduates can pursue careers in counseling, clinical practice, education, human resources, research, and more—each pathway benefitting from the depth and versatility of a psychology degree earned online or on campus.

Best Scientists Citing Clayton R. Cook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles