World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
12182
World Ranking
4561
National Ranking
218

Jack Dekker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Dekker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 243 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jack Dekker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Dekker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack Dekker is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology, with a focused expertise in Clinical Psychology. Their research spans several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's publication record includes research on a variety of mental health topics. Frequent publication venues where their work appears include BMC Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity, and Internet Interventions.

Key topics addressed in their research are:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Jack Dekker include:

  • Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • The Effects of Intensive Home Treatment on Self-Efficacy in Patients Recovering from a Psychiatric Crisis (2021, International Journal of Mental Health Systems)
  • Loneliness, Social Network Size and Mortality in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2022, European Journal of Ageing)
  • Biocueing and Ambulatory Biofeedback to Enhance Emotion Regulation: A Review of Studies Investigating Non-Psychiatric and Psychiatric Populations (2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology)
  • Psychotherapy or Medication for Depression? Using Individual Symptom Meta-Analyses to Derive a Symptom-Oriented Therapy (SOrT) Metric for a Personalised Psychiatry (2020, BMC Medicine)

Jack Dekker has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Matthijs Blankers, Jaap Peen, Aartjan T.F. Beekman, Henricus L. Van, and Anna E. Goudriaan. These partnerships reflect a network of researchers working on overlapping themes within mental health and psychotherapy.

Best Publications

  • The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders

    J. Peen;R. Schoevers;A.T.F. Beekman;J.J.M. Dekker

  • The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis

    Ellen Driessen;Ellen Driessen;Lisa M. Hegelmaier;Allan A. Abbass;Jacques P. Barber

  • The Association of Depression and Anxiety with Pain: A Study from NESDA

    Eric W. de Heer;Marloes M. J. G. Gerrits;Aartjan T. F. Beekman;Jack Dekker

  • Combining psychotherapy and antidepressants in the treatment of depression

    F de Jonghe;S Kool;G van Aalst;J Dekker

  • Adding psychotherapy to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depressive disorders in adults: a meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Jack Dekker;Steven D. Hollon;Gerhard Andersson

  • The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies

    Saskia de Maat;Frans de Jonghe;Robert Schoevers;Jack Dekker

  • Does pretreatment severity moderate the efficacy of psychological treatment of adult outpatient depression? A meta-analysis.

    Ellen Driessen;Pim Cuijpers;Steven D. Hollon;Jack J. M. Dekker

  • The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy in the outpatient treatment of major depression: a randomized clinical trial.

    Ellen Driessen;Henricus L. Van;Frank J. Don;Jaap Peen

  • Relative efficacy of psychotherapy and combined therapy in the treatment of depression: A meta-analysis

    Saskia M. de Maat;Jack Dekker;Robert A. Schoevers;Frans de Jonghe

  • Standardized Web-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy of Mild to Moderate Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Long-Term Follow-Up

    Jeroen Ruwaard;Bart Schrieken;Menno Schrijver;Janneke Broeksteeg

  • Depressive and anxiety disorders in different ethnic groups: a population based study among native Dutch, and Turkish, Moroccan and Surinamese migrants in Amsterdam.

    Matty A. S. de Wit;Wilco C. Tuinebreijer;Jack Dekker;Aart-Jan T. F. Beekman

  • INFLUENCE OF PERSONALITY ON THE OUTCOME OF TREATMENT IN DEPRESSION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

    Giles Newton-Howes;Giles Newton-Howes;Peter Tyrer;Tony Johnson;Roger Mulder

  • Psychotherapy alone and combined with pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression

    Frans de Jonghe;Mariëlle Hendricksen;Gerda van Aalst;Simone Kool

  • The obsessive compulsive spectrum in schizophrenia, a meta-analysis and meta-regression exploring prevalence rates

    Marije Swets;Jack Dekker;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Geert E. Smid

  • Prevention of Late-Life Depression in Primary Care: Do We Know Where to Begin?

    Robert A. Schoevers;Filip Smit;Dorly J.H. Deeg;Pim Cuijpers

  • Relative efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression; a meta-analysis,

    de S.C.M. Maat;J.J.M. Dekker;R. Schoevers;de F. Jonghe

  • Impact of loneliness and depression on mortality: results from the Longitudinal Ageing Study Amsterdam.

    Tjalling J. Holwerda;Theo G. van Tilburg;Dorly J. H. Deeg;Natasja Schutter

  • Linking childhood emotional abuse and depressive symptoms: The role of emotion dysregulation and interpersonal problems

    Carolien Christ;Marleen M. de Waal;Jack J. M. Dekker;Iris van Kuijk

  • Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Carolien Christ;Carolien Christ;Maria J.E. Schouten;Matthijs Blankers;Digna J.F. van Schaik;Digna J.F. van Schaik

  • Clinical use of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: is increased efficiency possible? A post hoc comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Maier and Bech subscales, Clinical Global Impression, and Symptom Checklist-90 scores

    Henricus G. Ruhé;Jack J. Dekker;Jaap Peen;Rebecca Holman

  • Is the prevalence of psychiatric disorders associated with urbanization

    Jaap Peen;Jack Dekker;Robert A. Schoevers;Margreet ten Have

  • Cognitive impairment in early and late bipolar disorder.

    Sigfried N.T.M. Schouws;Hannie C. Comijs;Max L. Stek;Jack Dekker

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Claudi L H Bockting
Claudi L H Bockting University of Amsterdam
Filip Smit
Filip Smit Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Patrick Luyten
Patrick Luyten University College London
Steven D. Hollon
Steven D. Hollon Vanderbilt University
Anna E. Goudriaan
Anna E. Goudriaan University of Amsterdam
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and professional pathways. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing accelerated counseling degrees, which can fast-track entry into rewarding careers in mental health, education, and human services.

With flexible online formats, programs like the fastest online counseling degrees in California and fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in Florida enable students to complete their studies at an expedited pace while balancing work or family commitments.

For those in the Midwest, options include Ohio accelerated counseling master degrees online, designed to prepare graduates for licensure and advanced roles in clinical or school environments.

Nationally, a wide range of America accelerated counseling master degrees online are available, helping graduates swiftly launch or advance their counseling careers and meet critical workforce demand across the country.

These pathways empower Psychology students to customize their education, pursue specialized credentials, and make a positive impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Jack Dekker

Trending Scientists