World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2837 2602 146 140 211 15727

Marcus J.H. Huibers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcus J.H. Huibers between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcus J.H. Huibers published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2007. 5 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2007. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
2000 2025

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcus J.H. Huibers: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 4
2003 4
2004 7
2005 6
2006 6
2007 18
2008 7
2009 10
2010 18
2011 15
2012 6
2013 11
2014 14
2015 16
2016 9
2017 11
2018 10
2019 8
2020 12
2021 18
2022 7
2023 7
2024 4
2025 1
Total 232
Download as CSV

Marcus J.H. Huibers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus J.H. Huibers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 211 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 211
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcus J.H. Huibers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus J.H. Huibers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcus J.H. Huibers is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology. The scope of their work also extends into pharmacology, applied psychology, and social psychology.

The scientist has contributed to multiple areas within the broader domain of mental health and psychotherapy research. Key topics covered in their research include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Marcus J.H. Huibers has been involved in several peer-reviewed papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression," 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data," 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients," 2020, The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • "On the Road to Personalized Psychotherapy: A Research Agenda Based on Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression," 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Treatment efficacy and effectiveness in adults with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma history: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2022, The Lancet Psychiatry

Their work has been published frequently in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychotherapy, BMC Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy, and The Lancet Psychiatry.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Marcus J.H. Huibers include:

  • Lotte H.J.M. Lemmens
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Frenk Peeters
  • Sanne J. E. Bruijniks
  • Suzanne C. van Bronswijk

Best Publications

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms a meta-analysis of individual participant data

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos W. Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes

    Pim Cuijpers;Mirjam Reijnders;Marcus J.H. Huibers

  • Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Marit Sijbrandij;Sander Koole;Marcus Huibers

  • How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence

    Pim Cuijpers;Ioana A. Cristea;Eirini Karyotaki;Mirjam Reijnders

  • Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: an 'individual patient data' meta-analysis

    Eirini Karyotaki;Annet M. Kleiboer;Filip Smit;David Trevor Turner

  • Revealing the dynamic network structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II

    Laura Bringmann;Lotte H Lemmens;Marcus Huibers;Denny Borsboom

  • Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Peter Bower;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Alex Sutton;Tony Kendrick

  • Rumination and worrying as possible mediators in the relation between neuroticism and symptoms of depression and anxiety in clinically depressed individuals.

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Marcus Huibers;Frenk Peeters;Arnoud Arntz

  • How much psychotherapy is needed to treat depression? A metaregression analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Marcus Huibers;David Daniel Ebert;David Daniel Ebert;Sander L. Koole

  • Early maladaptive schemas in depressed patients: Stability and relation with depressive symptoms over the course of treatment

    Fritz Renner;Jill Lobbestael;Frenk Peeters;Arnoud Arntz

  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Aya Suganuma;Edoardo G. Ostinelli;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Measuring Dysfunctional Attitudes in the General Population: The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (form A) Revised.

    L. Esther de Graaf;Jeffrey Roelofs;Marcus J. H. Huibers

  • Clinical effectiveness of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial.

    L.E. de Graaf;S.A.H. Gerhards;A.R. Arntz;H. Riper

  • Baseline Depression Severity as Moderator of Depression Outcomes Between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

    Erica S. Weitz;Steven D. Hollon;Jos Twisk;Annemieke van Straten

  • Common (non-specific) Factors in Psychotherapy.

    M.J.H. Huibers;P. Cuijpers

  • Efficacy of bupropion and nortriptyline for smoking cessation among people at risk for or with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    E. J. Wagena;E. J. Wagena;P. G. Knipschild;M. J. H. Huibers;E. F. M. Wouters

  • Mechanisms of change in psychotherapy for depression: An empirical update and evaluation of research aimed at identifying psychological mediators

    Lotte H J M Lemmens;Viola N L S Müller;Arnoud Arntz;Marcus J H Huibers

  • Combining pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy or monotherapy for major depression? A meta-analysis on the long-term effects.

    E. Karyotaki;Y. Smit;K. Holdt Henningsen;M.J.H. Huibers

  • Effects of neuroticism on depression and anxiety: Rumination as a possible mediator

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Marcus Huibers;Frenk Peeters;Arnoud Arntz

  • Economic evaluation of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial.

    S.A.H. Gerhards;L.E. de Graaf;L.E. Jacobs;J.L. Severens

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnoud Arntz
Arnoud Arntz University of Amsterdam
Frenk Peeters
Frenk Peeters Maastricht University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Robert J. DeRubeis
Robert J. DeRubeis University of Pennsylvania
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Jeffrey Roelofs
Jeffrey Roelofs Maastricht University
Gijs Bleijenberg
Gijs Bleijenberg Radboud University
Steven D. Hollon
Steven D. Hollon Vanderbilt University
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens the door to a range of rewarding online degrees and career opportunities. One in-demand pathway is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP) or speech therapist, a field that blends psychology with communication sciences. SLPs help people overcome speech, language, and swallowing disorders, and are essential in schools, hospitals, and private practice.

There are specific steps and certification requirements to enter this profession, which may vary by state. For example, learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Oklahoma or see what’s involved in becoming a speech therapist in Oregon. If you’re interested in the Northeast, review what’s needed for how to become a speech language pathologist in Pennsylvania and check the Rhode Island slp certification requirements.

Online degrees in psychology, speech pathology, or related disciplines can help you meet educational prerequisites, offering flexibility for working students. As demand grows for mental health and communication professionals, exploring these career pathways can lead to fulfilling, impactful roles.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus J.H. Huibers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles