World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
47014
World Ranking
8165
National Ranking
4235

Russell Broaddus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell Broaddus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 482 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Russell Broaddus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell Broaddus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell Broaddus is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and the biomedical sciences, with a strong focus on cancer research and related molecular mechanisms.

The primary fields of study for Broaddus include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work delves into several subfields such as Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Oncology.

Broaddus has contributed extensively to topics including Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment, Cancer-related gene regulation, and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research.

Frequent coauthors in Broaddus's research efforts include Andrew B. Gladden, Karen H. Lu, Bryan Fellman, Victoria Bae-Jump, and Melinda S. Yates.

Prominent publication venues for Broaddus include Clinical Cancer Research, Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, UNC Libraries, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Representative recent papers by Broaddus include:

  • Endometrial Cancer, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer, 2022, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • Prospective phase II trial of levonorgestrel intrauterine device: nonsurgical approach for complex atypical hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer, 2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Proteome Instability Is a Therapeutic Vulnerability in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer, 2020, Cancer Cell
  • Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Endorsement of College of American Pathologists Guideline, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma

    Gad Getz;Stacey B. Gabriel;Kristian Cibulskis;Eric Lander

  • The Immune Landscape of Cancer

    Vésteinn Thorsson;David L Gibbs;Scott D Brown;Denise Wolf

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Regulation of inflammatory responses by IL-17F.

    Xuexian O. Yang;Seon Hee Chang;Heon Park;Roza Nurieva

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Victor Abkevich;Kirsten Timms;Bryan T. Hennessy;Jennifer Potter

  • Erratum: Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations (ARTICLE (2018) 173(2) (371–385), (S009286741830237X), (10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.060))

    Matthew H. Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • High Frequency of PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 Mutations in Endometrial Cancer Elucidates a Novel Mechanism for Regulation of PTEN Protein Stability

    Lydia W.T. Cheung;Bryan T. Hennessy;Bryan T. Hennessy;Jie Li;Shuangxing Yu

  • Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas

    Franz X. Schaub;Varsha Dhankani;Ashton C. Berger;Mihir Trivedi

  • Integrated analyses identify a master microRNA regulatory network for the mesenchymal subtype in serous ovarian cancer

    Da Yang;Yan Sun;Yan Sun;Limei Hu;Hong Zheng;Hong Zheng

  • Gynecologic cancer as a "sentinel cancer" for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

    Karen H. Lu;Mai Dinh;Wendy Kohlmann;Patrice Watson

  • Feasibility of Large-Scale Genomic Testing to Facilitate Enrollment Onto Genomically Matched Clinical Trials

    Funda Meric-Bernstam;Lauren Brusco;Kenna Shaw;Chacha Horombe

  • Somatic Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Could Expand the Number of Patients That Benefit From Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

    Bryan T.J. Hennessy;Kirsten M. Timms;Mark S. Carey;Alexander Gutin

  • Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC): a single institution review of 129 cases.

    Brian M Slomovitz;Thomas W Burke;Patricia J Eifel;Lois M Ramondetta

  • Integrated Molecular Characterization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

    Andrew D. Cherniack;Hui Shen;Vonn Walter;Chip Stewart

  • Patterns of gene expression in different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer correlate with those in normal fallopian tube, endometrium, and colon.

    Rebecca T. Marquez;Keith A. Baggerly;Andrea P. Patterson;Jinsong Liu

  • Prospective determination of prevalence of lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer.

    Karen H. Lu;John O. Schorge;Kerry J. Rodabaugh;Molly S. Daniels

  • Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC: a comparison with sporadic endometrial carcinoma.

    Russell R. Broaddus M.D.;Henry T. Lynch;Lee-may Chen;Molly S. Daniels

  • Integrated analyses identify a master microrna regulatory network for the mesenchymal subtype in serous ovarian cancer [Cancer Cell 23 (2013) 186-199]

    Da Yang;Yan Sun;Limei Hu;Hong Zheng

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen H. Lu
Karen H. Lu The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gordon B. Mills
Gordon B. Mills Oregon Health & Science University
Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Rajyalakshmi Luthra The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Funda Meric-Bernstam The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Scott Kopetz
Scott Kopetz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
David M. Gershenson
David M. Gershenson The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Anil K. Sood
Anil K. Sood The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Robert L. Coleman
Robert L. Coleman The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
David S. Hong
David S. Hong The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Alexander J. Lazar
Alexander J. Lazar The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare offers flexible options for those looking to advance or start their careers in medicine. Many nurses choose bridge programs to build on existing credentials. For example, those seeking to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing can consider options like an rn to bsn with no clinicals program, which allows RNs to advance without on-site training requirements.

If you already have a master’s in nursing, you may be interested in accelerated msn to dnp programs. These streamlined online programs help experienced nurses achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree faster. Cost is also a key consideration; those seeking affordability can explore the cheapest online dnp programs to complete their studies with less financial strain.

For prospective nurses aiming to enter the workforce quickly, it's important to know what is the fastest way to become an lpn. Fast-track LPN programs online can provide a direct route to licensure and employment, making them an increasingly popular choice in today’s healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Russell Broaddus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles