World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
122
Citations
53777
World Ranking
3482
National Ranking
145

C. Blake Gilks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Blake Gilks sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 444 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

C. Blake Gilks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Blake Gilks sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. Blake Gilks is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broad disciplines, their work focuses on several subfields including Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The main topics of Gilks' research address various aspects of cancer diagnosis and treatment with a significant focus on ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Specific research topics include:

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways

Gilks has contributed to several recent papers, some of which are:

  • Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, published in Cancer
  • p53abn Endometrial Cancer: understanding the most aggressive endometrial cancers in the era of molecular classification, 2021, published in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
  • Therapeutic options for mucinous ovarian carcinoma, 2020, published in Gynecologic Oncology
  • Molecular characterization of invasive and in situ squamous neoplasia of the vulva and implications for morphologic diagnosis and outcome, 2020, published in Modern Pathology
  • Re-assigning the histologic identities of COV434 and TOV-112D ovarian cancer cell lines, 2020, published in Gynecologic Oncology

Frequent publication venues for Gilks include:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Modern Pathology
  • International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Cancer

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, notably:

  • Jessica N. McAlpine
  • David G. Huntsman
  • Martin Köbel
  • Samuel Leung
  • Aline Talhouk

In addition to journal publications, Gilks has also contributed to academic books. One of their book publications is:

  • Tumors of the Ovary and Fallopian Tube, published in 2023 by American Registry of PathologyArlington, Virginia eBooks

Best Publications

  • Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma

    Gad Getz;Stacey B. Gabriel;Kristian Cibulskis;Eric Lander

  • Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma

    Torsten O. Nielsen;Forrest D. Hsu;Kristin Jensen;Maggie Cheang

  • Tumour hypoxia promotes tolerance and angiogenesis via CCL28 and T reg cells

    Andrea Facciabene;Xiaohui Peng;Ian S. Hagemann;Klara Balint

  • Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker Studies

    Martin Köbel;Martin Köbel;Steve E Kalloger;Niki Boyd;Steven McKinney

  • Mutation of FOXL2 in Granulosa-Cell Tumors of the Ovary

    Sohrab P Shah;Martin Köbel;Janine Senz;Ryan D Morin

  • A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers

    A. Talhouk;M. K. McConechy;S. Leung;H. H. Li-Chang

  • Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer

    Aline Talhouk;Melissa K. McConechy;Samuel Leung;Winnie Yang

  • A landscape effect in tenosynovial giant-cell tumor from activation of CSF1 expression by a translocation in a minority of tumor cells.

    Robert B. West;Brian P. Rubin;Melinda A. Miller;Subbaya Subramanian

  • Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis without Cancer

    Michael S. Anglesio;Nickolas Papadopoulos;Ayse Ayhan;Tayyebeh M. Nazeran

  • Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series

    S. Kommoss;M. K. McConechy;F. Kommoss;S. Leung

  • Systematic Analysis of Immune Infiltrates in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Reveals CD20, FoxP3 and TIA-1 as Positive Prognostic Factors

    Katy Milne;Martin Köbel;Steven E. Kalloger;Rebecca O. Barnes

  • Hormone-receptor expression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

    Weiva Sieh;Martin Köbel;Teri A Longacre;David D Bowtell;David D Bowtell

  • Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma.

    C. Blake Gilks;Esther Oliva;Robert A. Soslow

  • Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas.

    Martin Köbel;Steve E. Kalloger;David G. Huntsman;Jennifer L. Santos

  • TITAN: inference of copy number architectures in clonal cell populations from tumor whole-genome sequence data

    Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Andrew Roth;Andrew Roth;Jaswinder Khattra;Julie Ho

  • Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Reproducible Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes in Multiple Independent Patient Cohorts

    D. Neil Hayes;Stefano Monti;Giovanni Parmigiani;C. Blake Gilks

  • Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities.

    Joshua Z Press;Alessandro De Luca;Niki Boyd;Sean Young;Sean Young

  • Divergent modes of clonal spread and intraperitoneal mixing in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

    Andrew McPherson;Andrew Roth;Andrew Roth;Emma Laks;Tehmina Masud;Tehmina Masud

  • Intraepithelial T cells and prognosis in ovarian carcinoma: novel associations with stage, tumor type, and BRCA1 loss

    Blaise Clarke;Anna V. Tinker;Cheng Han Lee;Subbaya Subramanian

  • Use of mutation profiles to refine the classification of endometrial carcinomas.

    Melissa K McConechy;Jiarui Ding;Jiarui Ding;Maggie Cu Cheang;Kimberly C Wiegand

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Huntsman
David G. Huntsman University of British Columbia
Martin Köbel
Martin Köbel University of Calgary
Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
Robert A. Soslow
Robert A. Soslow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Sohrab P. Shah
Sohrab P. Shah Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Matt van de Rijn
Matt van de Rijn Stanford University
Esther Oliva
Esther Oliva Harvard University
Maggie C.U. Cheang
Maggie C.U. Cheang Institute of Cancer Research
Brad H. Nelson
Brad H. Nelson University of British Columbia
David D.L. Bowtell
David D.L. Bowtell Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine or expanding their healthcare careers, there are several flexible online degree options worth considering. For those drawn to nutrition and wellness, online nutrition degrees offer comprehensive study into diet, health, and disease prevention—all accessible remotely.

Many aspiring healthcare administrators seek programs that are not only convenient but also well respected. Prospective leaders should explore which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? to ensure their qualifications are valued by employers nationwide.

Registered nurses looking to advance can benefit from best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, making it possible to obtain a bachelor’s degree while balancing work and personal obligations.

For nurses seeking a terminal degree, numerous online dnp programs provide the chance to move into leadership, education, or advanced practice roles in a flexible format. Exploring these pathways can open up rewarding career trajectories within the diverse healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing C. Blake Gilks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles