World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
12908
World Ranking
18221
National Ranking
99

Richard A. Engh publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Engh sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 166 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard A. Engh D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Engh sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Engh is affiliated with the University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway. Their research spans multiple fields within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on molecular biology as indicated by their publication record.

The scientific contributions of Richard A. Engh cover specific areas including:

  • Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways

Their recent papers reflect a concentration on kinase inhibitors, peptide interactions, and computational drug discovery. Notable publications are:

  • BindingDB Entry 50001791: Novel Scaffolds for Dual Specificity Tyrosine-Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase (DYRK1A) Inhibitors, 2020, PubMed
  • Novel DYRK1A Inhibitor Rescues Learning and Memory Deficits in a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome, 2021, Pharmaceuticals
  • Label-free measurement of antimicrobial peptide interactions with lipid vesicles and nanodiscs using microscale thermophoresis, 2023, Scientific Reports
  • Drugging the Undruggable: How Isoquinolines and PKA Initiated the Era of Designed Protein Kinase Inhibitor Therapeutics, 2021, Biochemistry
  • Inhibitor binding to mutants of protein kinase A with GGGxxG and GxGxxA glycine-rich loop motifs, 2020, Journal of Molecular Recognition

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Engh include:

  • John S. Svendsen
  • Ulli Rothweiler
  • Philip Rainsford
  • Fredrik G. Rylandsholm
  • Martin Jakubec

The publication venues most associated with Richard A. Engh are:

  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Scientific Reports
  • Biochemistry
  • Journal of Molecular Recognition
  • PubMed

Richard A. Engh's work integrates experimental and computational approaches to explore complex biochemical interactions, with a particular emphasis on kinase regulation and development of inhibitors relevant to diseases such as Down syndrome. Their research contributes to expanding knowledge in molecular behavior, drug discovery, and signaling pathways.

Best Publications

  • Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement

    Richard A. Engh;Robert Huber

  • The 2.0 A X-ray crystal structure of chicken egg white cystatin and its possible mode of interaction with cysteine proteinases.

    W. Bode;R. Engh;D. Musil;U. Thiele

  • The refined 2.15 A X-ray crystal structure of human liver cathepsin B: the structural basis for its specificity.

    D. Musil;D. Zucic;D. Turk;R.A. Engh

  • Crystal Structure of the Xanthine Oxidase-Related Aldehyde Oxido-Reductase from D. gigas

    Maria J. Romão;Margarida Archer;Isabel Moura;José J. G. Moura

  • Phosphotransferase and substrate binding mechanism of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit from porcine heart as deduced from the 2.0 A structure of the complex with Mn2+ adenylyl imidodiphosphate and inhibitor peptide PKI(5-24).

    D. Bossemeyer;R.A. Engh;V. Kinzel;H. Ponstingl

  • Chalcone derivatives antagonize interactions between the human oncoprotein MDM2 and p53.

    Raphael Stoll;Christian Renner;Silke Hansen;Stefan Palme

  • Crystal Structures of Catalytic Subunit of cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase in Complex with Isoquinolinesulfonyl Protein Kinase Inhibitors H7, H8, and H89 STRUCTURAL IMPLICATIONS FOR SELECTIVITY

    Richard A. Engh;Andreas Girod;Volker Kinzel;Robert Huber

  • X-ray Structure of Active Site-inhibited Clotting Factor Xa IMPLICATIONS FOR DRUG DESIGN AND SUBSTRATE RECOGNITION

    H Brandstetter;A Kühne;W Bode;R Huber

  • Crystal structure of a thermostable type B DNA polymerase from Thermococcus gorgonarius.

    Karl-Peter Hopfner;Andreas Eichinger;Richard A. Engh;Frank Laue

  • Protein Kinase A in Complex with Rho-Kinase Inhibitors Y-27632, Fasudil, and H-1152P: Structural Basis of Selectivity

    Christine Breitenlechner;Michael Gassel;Hiroyoshi Hidaka;Volker Kinzel

  • Staurosporine-induced conformational changes of cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit explain inhibitory potential

    Lars Prade;Richard A Engh;Andreas Girod;Volker Kinzel

  • The Interaction of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I with the N-Terminal Domain of Igfbp-5

    Wojciech Żesławski;Hans-Georg Beisel;Mariusz Kamionka;Wenzel Kalus

  • Lysine 156 promotes the anomalous proenzyme activity of tPA: X-ray crystal structure of single-chain human tPA.

    Martin Renatus;Richard A. Engh;Richard A. Engh;Milton T. Stubbs;Robert Huber

  • Protein kinase inhibition of clinically important staurosporine analogues

    Osman A B S M Gani;Richard A Engh

  • Coagulation factor IXa: the relaxed conformation of Tyr99 blocks substrate binding.

    Karl-Peter Hopfner;Anja Lang;Annette Karcher;Katrin Sichler

  • The 0.25-nm X-ray structure of the Bowman-Birk-type inhibitor from mung bean in ternary complex with porcine trypsin.

    Guangda Lin;Wolfram Bode;Robert Huber;Chengwu Chi

  • The 1.8-Å Crystal Structure of a Matrix Metalloproteinase 8-Barbiturate Inhibitor Complex Reveals a Previously Unobserved Mechanism for Collagenase Substrate Recognition

    Hans Brandstetter;Frank Grams;Dagmar Glitz;Anja Lang

  • Structure-based optimization of novel azepane derivatives as PKB inhibitors

    Christine B. Breitenlechner;Thomas Wegge;Laurent Berillon;Klaus Graul

  • FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication tyrosine kinase inhibitors display a nonoverlapping profile of resistance mutations in vitro.

    Nikolas von Bubnoff;Richard A. Engh;Espen Åberg;Jana Sänger

  • Differential sensitivity of ERBB2 kinase domain mutations towards lapatinib.

    Rama Krishna Kancha;Nikolas von Bubnoff;Natalie Bartosch;Christian Peschel

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Huber
Robert Huber University of Duisburg-Essen
Wolfram Bode
Wolfram Bode Max Planck Society
Robert Huber
Robert Huber Agricultural & Applied Economics Association
Tad A. Holak
Tad A. Holak Jagiellonian University
Hans Brandstetter
Hans Brandstetter University of Salzburg
Karl-Peter Hopfner
Karl-Peter Hopfner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christian Klein
Christian Klein Roche (Switzerland)
Christian Peschel
Christian Peschel Technical University of Munich
Michal Dadlez
Michal Dadlez Polish Academy of Sciences
Werner Machleidt
Werner Machleidt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA unlocks a wide range of academic options and career opportunities. Many prospective students now look to flexible online degrees to expand their skills while maintaining work-life balance.

If you're interested in leadership roles in health organizations, consider doctoral programs for healthcare administration. These online doctorates focus on advanced healthcare policy, management, and operations.

For those seeking career advancement in pharmacy without a traditional undergraduate background in pharmacy, online pharmd programs for non pharmacists offer a tailored entry point into this highly respected field.

Interested in human movement, wellness, or athletic performance? Accredited degrees such as exercise science degree online accredited and online kinesiology programs are popular options to build expertise for careers in fitness, rehabilitation, and research.

Online education in these fields supports career development, certification preparation, and new job opportunities—all with the flexibility of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Engh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles