World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reinhilde Jacobs

Reinhilde Jacobs

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
39866
World Ranking
5192
National Ranking
55

Reinhilde Jacobs publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinhilde Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 879 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Reinhilde Jacobs D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinhilde Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Reinhilde Jacobs is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the fields of Dentistry and Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Oral Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Orthodontics, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's research topics focus on several key areas related to oral healthcare and dental technologies. Main topics covered include:

  • Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
  • Cleft Lip and Palate Research

Reinhilde Jacobs has published numerous research papers, with frequent appearances in several scientific journals. The prominent venues where the scientist's work is often published include:

  • Journal of Dentistry
  • Scientific Reports
  • Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
  • Clinical Oral Investigations
  • Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Notable recent papers by Reinhilde Jacobs include:

  • Conceptual design report for the LUXE experiment, 2021, The European Physical Journal Special Topics
  • Artificial intelligence-driven novel tool for tooth detection and segmentation on panoramic radiographs, 2020, Clinical Oral Investigations
  • Artificial Intelligence for Fast and Accurate 3-Dimensional Tooth Segmentation on Cone-beam Computed Tomography, 2021, Journal of Endodontics
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Oral Healthcare, 2020, PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
  • Layered deep learning for automatic mandibular segmentation in cone-beam computed tomography, 2021, Journal of Dentistry

The frequent co-authors in Reinhilde Jacobs's research collaborations include:

  • Constantinus Politis
  • Sohaib Shujaat
  • Eman Shaheen
  • Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele
  • Karla de Faria Vasconcelos

Best Publications

  • Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.

    Ruben Pauwels;Jilke Beinsberger;Bruno Collaert;Chrysoula Theodorakou

  • Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.

    M. Loubele;R. Bogaerts;E. Van Dijck;R. Pauwels

  • State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement.

    Maria Eugenia Guerrero;Reinhilde Jacobs;Miet Loubele;Filip Schutyser

  • A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality

    Xin Liang;Xin Liang;Reinhilde Jacobs;Bassam Hassan;Limin Li

  • Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.

    N. Van Assche;D van Steenberghe;M.E. Guerrero;E. Hirsch

  • CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

    Ruben Pauwels;Reinhilde Jacobs;Steven R Singer;Muralidhar Mupparapu

  • Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.

    Ignace Naert;George Koutsikakis;Joke Duyck;Marc Quirynen

  • Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks.

    Michael Michael M. Bornstein;William C Scarfe;Vida M Vaughn;Reinhilde Jacobs

  • Accuracy of computer‐aided implant placement

    N. Van Assche;M. Vercruyssen;W. Coucke;W. Teughels

  • Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.

    Reinhilde Jacobs;Reinhilde Jacobs;Benjamin Salmon;Marina Codari;Bassam Hassan

  • Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption

    Ali Alqerban;Reinhilde Jacobs;Steffen Fieuws;Guy Willems

  • E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw.

    David Harris;Keith Horner;Kerstin Gröndahl;Reinhilde Jacobs

  • The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage.

    Daniel Van Steenberghe;Reinhilde Jacobs;Mandy Desnyder;Gaia Maffei

  • E.A.O. guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin.

    David Harris;Daniel Buser;Karl Dula;Kerstin Gröndahl

  • Dental age estimation through volume matching of teeth imaged by cone-beam CT

    Fan Yang;Reinhilde Jacobs;Guy Willems

  • Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice

    Bart Vandenberghe;Reinhilde Jacobs;Hilde Bosmans

  • A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT.

    Miet Loubele;Maria Eugenia Guerrero;Reinhilde Jacobs;Paul Suetens

  • Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements.

    M. Loubele;N. Van Assche;K. Carpentier;F. Maes

  • A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.

    Xin Liang;Xin Liang;Ivo Lambrichts;Yi Sun;Kathleen Denis

  • Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images

    Ruben Pauwels;Harry Stamatakis;Hilde Bosmans;Ria Bogaerts

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Quirynen
Marc Quirynen KU Leuven
Ignace Naert
Ignace Naert KU Leuven
Frederik Maes
Frederik Maes KU Leuven
Paul Suetens
Paul Suetens KU Leuven
Judith E. Adams
Judith E. Adams University of Manchester
Arjan Vissink
Arjan Vissink University Medical Center Groningen
Guy Marchal
Guy Marchal KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers related to medicine, pursuing an online degree can be an affordable and flexible option. Many students consider advanced practice roles, such as nurse practitioners, for their high employability and rewarding work. If cost is a concern, be sure to explore the cheapest fnp programs online to find accredited pathways that won’t break the bank.

Entry-level nursing professionals can benefit from enrolling in online nursing school, which often offers flexible scheduling to accommodate working students. Registered nurses (RNs) looking to advance their qualifications often seek RN to BSN degree conversion programs. If affordability is important, check out what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online to compare your options.

For those interested in academic or leadership roles, pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) may be the next step. Learn more about the cheapest dnp programs available online for a cost-effective route to the pinnacle of nursing education.

Best Scientists Citing Reinhilde Jacobs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles