World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
12782
World Ranking
8175
National Ranking
326

Yair Wand publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yair Wand sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yair Wand D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yair Wand sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yair Wand is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Decision Sciences, with a focus on various subfields including Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Management Information Systems.

Their work addresses several key topics within these fields. These include Data Quality and Management, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Advanced Database Systems and Queries, and Big Data and Business Intelligence.

Yair Wand has contributed to academic literature through publications in notable venues. They have published papers in the Journal of Database Management and the European Journal of Information Systems.

  • A Meta-Analysis of Ontological Guidance and Users' Understanding of Conceptual Models, 2020, Journal of Database Management
  • Skipping class: improving human-driven data exploration and querying through instances, 2021, European Journal of Information Systems

Their research collaborations include frequent coauthorship with Arash Saghafi and Jeffrey Parsons.

  • Arash Saghafi
  • Jeffrey Parsons

Best Publications

  • Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations

    Yair Wand;Richard Y. Wang

  • Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling--A Research Agenda

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • An ontological model of an information system

    Y. Wand;R. Weber

  • On the deep structure of information systems

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling

    Yair Wand;Veda C. Storey;Ron Weber

  • A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques

    Andrew Gemino;Yair Wand

  • Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: comparison of mandatory and optional properties

    Andrew Gemino;Yair Wand

  • Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development

    Yair Wand;David E. Monarchi;Jeffrey Parsons;Carson C. Woo

  • Organizational memory information systems: a transactive memory approach

    Dorit Nevo;Yair Wand

  • Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling

    Jeffrey Parsons;Yair Wand

  • A proposal for a formal model of objects

    Yair Wand

  • Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling

    Jeffrey Parsons;Yair Wand

  • Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning

    Andrew Gemino;Yair Wand

  • Ontology based object-oriented domain modelling: fundamental concepts

    Joerg Evermann;Yair Wand

  • An ontological evaluation of systems analysis and design methods

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • On the notion of soft‐goals in business process modeling

    Pnina Soffer;Yair Wand

  • Mario Bunge's ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • TOWARD A THEORY OF THE DEEP STRUCTURE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • Guidelines for Empirical Evaluations of Conceptual Modeling Grammars

    Andrew Nicholas Burton-Jones;Yair Wand;Ronald Weber

  • A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept

    Paul Ralph;Yair Wand

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Parsons
Jeffrey Parsons Memorial University of Newfoundland
Ron Weber
Ron Weber Monash University
Pnina Soffer
Pnina Soffer University of Haifa
Izak Benbasat
Izak Benbasat University of British Columbia
Robert Meersman
Robert Meersman Graz University of Technology
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Jérôme Euzenat
Jérôme Euzenat Grenoble Alpes University
Karl Aberer
Karl Aberer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Oscar Pastor
Oscar Pastor Universitat Politècnica de València
Steffen Staab
Steffen Staab University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of career pathways, especially with the rise of online education. Many students are drawn to short degrees that pay well for their ability to fast-track job opportunities in tech-related fields. These programs offer flexibility and can lead to rewarding roles in areas such as IT support, web development, and cybersecurity.

If you're interested in cutting-edge technology, pursuing one of the ai degree programs could help you develop specialized skills for careers in artificial intelligence, data science, and robotics. For those still considering their path, it’s smart to review your options with a guide to the best program in college. This can help match your interests and career goals to the right major.

Additionally, professionals seeking to boost their credentials without a lengthy commitment might look into the easiest masters programs to get into. These master's programs, often available online, provide advancement opportunities while balancing work and study life. The evolving landscape ensures there are diverse and accessible options for every learner.

Best Scientists Citing Yair Wand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles