World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
8519
World Ranking
9176
National Ranking
3904

Veda C. Storey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veda C. Storey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 266 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Veda C. Storey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veda C. Storey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS)

Overview

Veda C. Storey is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including computer science and social sciences, with a focus on artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, management information systems, information systems, and computer networks and communications.

The primary topics of their work cover a range of areas relevant to information systems and data analysis. These topics include:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Veda C. Storey has published extensively in various academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • Decision Support Systems
  • ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

Recent publications by Veda C. Storey include the following:

  • Text Analysis of Evolving Emotions and Sentiments in COVID-19 Twitter Communication (2022) in Cognitive Computation
  • Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities (2022) in Electronic Markets
  • Knowledge contributions in design science research: Paths of knowledge types (2022) in Decision Support Systems
  • A Google-Wikipedia-Twitter Model as a Leading Indicator of the Numbers of Coronavirus Deaths (2020) in Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
  • The impact of cognitive biases on the believability of fake news (2023) in European Journal of Information Systems

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors. Key collaborators with multiple joint publications include:

  • Óscar Pastor
  • Roman Lukyanenko
  • Jeffrey Parsons
  • Stephen W. Liddle
  • Giancarlo Guizzardi

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Veda C. Storey was named a Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact

    Hsinchun Chen;Roger H. L. Chiang;Veda C. Storey

  • A framework for analysis of data quality research

    R.Y. Wang;V.C. Storey;C.P. Firth

  • An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling

    Yair Wand;Veda C. Storey;Ron Weber

  • A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies

    Andrew Burton-Jones;Veda C. Storey;Vijayan Sugumaran;Punit Ahluwalia

  • Reverse engineering of relational databases: extraction of an EER model from a relational database

    Roger H. L. Chiang;Terence M. Barron;Veda C. Storey

  • Ontologies for conceptual modeling: their creation, use, and management

    Vijayan Sugumaran;Veda C. Storey

  • Understanding semantic relationships

    Veda C. Storey

  • Big data technologies and Management

    Veda C. Storey;Il-Yeol Song

  • A semantic-based approach to component retrieval

    Vijayan Sugumaran;Veda C. Storey

  • Conceptual Modeling - Er 2007

    Christine Parent;Klaus-Dieter Schewe;Veda C. Storey;Bernhard Thalheim

  • Genres of inquiry in design-science research: justification and evaluation of knowledge production

    Richard L. Baskerville;Mala Kaul;Veda C. Storey

  • The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field

    Sandeep Purao;Carliss Y. Baldwin;Alan R. Hevner;Veda C. Storey

  • The role of domain ontologies in database design: An ontology management and conceptual modeling environment

    Vijayan Sugumaran;Veda C. Storey

  • Data-Driven Meets Theory-Driven Research in the Era of Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges for Information Systems Research

    Wolfgang Maass;Jeffrey Parsons;Sandeep Purao;Veda C. Storey

  • Conceptual Modeling — ER 2000

    Alberto H. F. Laender;Stephen W. Liddle;Veda C. Storey

  • Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities

    Unknown

  • The use of spreadsheets in organizations: determinants and consequences

    Yolande E. Chan;Veda C. Storey

  • Improving database design through the analysis of relationships

    Debabrata Dey;Veda C. Storey;Terence M. Barron

  • Compliance to the fair information practices: how are the fortune 500 handling online privacy disclosures?

    Kathy Stewart Schwaig;Gerald C. Kane;Veda C. Storey

  • A methodology for creating user views in database design

    Veda C. Storey;Robert C. Goldstein

  • Improving Analysis Pattern Reuse in Conceptual Design: Augmenting Automated Processes with Supervised Learning

    Sandeep Purao;Veda C. Storey;Taedong Han

  • Knowledge-based approaches to database design

    Veda C. Storey;Robert C. Goldstein

  • A conceptual investigation of the e-commerce industry

    Veda C. Storey;Detmar W. Straub;Kathy A. Stewart;Richard J. Welke

Frequent Co-Authors

Vijayan Sugumaran
Vijayan Sugumaran University of Rochester
Oscar Pastor
Oscar Pastor Universitat Politècnica de València
Richard L. Baskerville
Richard L. Baskerville Georgia State University
Alberto H. F. Laender
Alberto H. F. Laender Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Daniel E. O'Leary
Daniel E. O'Leary University of Southern California
Bernhard Thalheim
Bernhard Thalheim Kiel University
Jan Pries-Heje
Jan Pries-Heje Roskilde University
Sudha Ram
Sudha Ram University of Arizona
Giancarlo Guizzardi
Giancarlo Guizzardi University of Twente
Ron Weber
Ron Weber Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science offers many pathways, especially with the growing popularity of online education. If you’re aiming for further specialization or want to boost your earning potential, consider pursuing graduate degrees that are worth it. These programs focus on in-demand skills and can open doors to advanced roles in tech.

For those seeking a quicker entry into the tech industry, 2 year online degrees in computer science or IT are a practical option. These degrees provide essential knowledge and can be a stepping stone to a bachelor’s program or immediate employment.

Worried about the cost? You can find cheap online college classes that offer good value without sacrificing educational quality. Many accredited institutions provide affordable tuition for online learners.

Admission requirements are flexible, too. Students with lower GPAs can find quality science and tech programs at online colleges that accept low gpa. This makes higher education accessible to a wider range of learners who are committed to advancing in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Veda C. Storey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles