World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9482 8865 646 606 83 5967

James M. Cantor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James M. Cantor between 1992 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James M. Cantor published across 32 years, from 1992 to 2023, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2015. 1 of the 84 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2015. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 6 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1992 2023

84 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James M. Cantor: publications per year, 1992 to 2023
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 3
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 7
2007 2
2008 6
2009 5
2010 2
2011 1
2012 6
2013 2
2014 4
2015 11
2016 2
2017 8
2018 7
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
Total 84
Download as CSV

James M. Cantor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Cantor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James M. Cantor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Cantor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James M. Cantor is affiliated with the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and psychology, with particular focus on reproductive medicine, experimental and cognitive psychology, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their work encompasses topics such as hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, and growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors. These topics reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding physiological and behavioral processes.

Cantor has published research in venues including Hormones and Behavior. A recent paper titled Timing of peripubertal steroid exposure predicts visuospatial cognition in men: Evidence from three samples was published in 2020 in Hormones and Behavior.

  • Talia Shirazi
  • H. L. Self
  • Khytam Dawood
  • Rodrigo A. Cárdenas
  • Kevin A. Rosenfield

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Talia Shirazi
  • H. L. Self
  • Khytam Dawood
  • Rodrigo A. Cárdenas
  • Kevin A. Rosenfield

The main fields of study for Cantor are medicine and psychology, with 2 publications in medicine and 1 in psychology. Their subfields of study cover reproductive medicine, experimental and cognitive psychology, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Evolutionary psychology and human behavior
  • Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors

Best Publications

  • Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia.

    Michael C. Seto;James M. Cantor;Ray Blanchard

  • Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V.

    Ray Blanchard;Ray Blanchard;Amy D. Lykins;Amy D. Lykins;Diane K. Wherrett;Michael E. Kuban

  • Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men

    James M. Cantor;Noor Kabani;Noor Kabani;Noor Kabani;Bruce K. Christensen;Bruce K. Christensen;Robert B. Zipursky;Robert B. Zipursky

  • Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia.

    James M. Cantor;Ray Blanchard;Bruce K. Christensen;Robert Dickey

  • Quantitative Reanalysis of Aggregate Data on IQ in Sexual Offenders

    James M. Cantor;Ray Blanchard;Lori K. Robichaud;Bruce K. Christensen

  • Confabulation, memory deficits, and frontal dysfunction.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Margaret O'Connor;James Cantor

  • The Recalled Childhood Gender Identity/Gender Role Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties

    Kenneth J. Zucker;Janet N. Mitchell;Janet N. Mitchell;Susan J. Bradley;Jan Tkachuk

  • Non-offending Pedophiles

    James M. Cantor;Ian V. McPhail

  • Hypersexuality: A Critical Review and Introduction to the "Sexhavior Cycle".

    Michael T. Walton;James M. Cantor;Navjot Bhullar;Amy D. Lykins

  • Perceptions of heterosexual bias in professional psychology programs: A survey of graduate students.

    Neil W. Pilkington;James M. Cantor

  • Self-reported head injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and nonpedophilic men referred for clinical assessment

    Ray Blanchard;Michael E. Kuban;Philip Klassen;Robert Dickey

  • Chronic fluoxetine inhibits sexual behavior in the male rat: reversal with oxytocin.

    James M. Cantor;Yitzchak M. Binik;James G. Pfaus

  • Retrospective self-reports of childhood accidents causing unconsciousness in phallometrically diagnosed pedophiles.

    Ray Blanchard;Ray Blanchard;Bruce K. Christensen;Bruce K. Christensen;Scott M. Strong;James M. Cantor

  • IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source.

    Ray Blanchard;Ray Blanchard;Nathan J. Kolla;Nathan J. Kolla;James M. Cantor;Philip E. Klassen;Philip E. Klassen

  • How Many Gay Men Owe Their Sexual Orientation to Fraternal Birth Order

    James M. Cantor;Ray Blanchard;Ray Blanchard;Andrew D. Paterson;Anthony F. Bogaert

  • Interaction of fraternal birth order and handedness in the development of male homosexuality.

    Ray Blanchard;James M. Cantor;Anthony F. Bogaert;S. Marc Breedlove

  • Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia.

    James M. Cantor;Philip E. Klassen;Philip E. Klassen;Robert Dickey;Robert Dickey;Bruce K. Christensen;Bruce K. Christensen

  • The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2): development and criterion-related validation

    Michael C. Seto;Skye Stephens;Martin L. Lalumière;James M. Cantor

  • Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.

    Ian V McPhail;Chantal A Hermann;Stephanie Fernane;Yolanda M Fernandez

  • Aging Versus Stable Enduring Traits as Explanatory Constructs in Sex Offender Recidivism: Partitioning Actuarial Prediction Into Conceptually Meaningful Components

    Howard E. Barbaree;Calvin M. Langton;Ray Blanchard;James M. Cantor

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray Blanchard
Ray Blanchard University of Toronto
Michael C. Seto
Michael C. Seto University of Ottawa
Bruce K. Christensen
Bruce K. Christensen Australian National University
Kenneth J. Zucker
Kenneth J. Zucker University of Toronto
David J. Mikulis
David J. Mikulis University Health Network
Howard E. Barbaree
Howard E. Barbaree University of Toronto
Navjot Bhullar
Navjot Bhullar University of New England
Anthony F. Bogaert
Anthony F. Bogaert Brock University
S. Marc Breedlove
S. Marc Breedlove Michigan State University
Yitzchak M. Binik
Yitzchak M. Binik McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to various online programs and diverse career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many aspiring professionals wonder how to become a mental health counselor in Aurora, or in other cities across the country, as requirements can differ by state and city.

Earning a degree online has become an accessible way to achieve professional goals, but it's essential to understand unique local guidelines. For example, licensing and certification can vary—the Austin mental health counselor certification requirements may not match those in other regions. Similarly, for those looking to practice in California, resources on how to become a mental health counselor in Bakersfield highlight state-specific standards.

While online degrees offer flexibility, aspiring counselors should carefully research local licensure criteria. If you're interested in the East Coast, learning about mental health counselor requirements in Baltimore can help you plan accordingly. No matter your location, a solid understanding of these requirements ensures your Psychology education leads to a rewarding and recognized career path.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Cantor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles