World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
12888
World Ranking
4598
National Ranking
321

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
37
Citations
11572
World Ranking
8236
National Ranking
412

Ron Weber publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron Weber sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ron Weber D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron Weber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ron Weber is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has contributed to research primarily across economics, management, and information systems. Their work spans several interdisciplinary areas, focusing on microfinance, digital finance, and the theoretical foundations of information systems.

Their recent publications address diverse topics such as financial inclusion, disaster risk finance, and accounting information systems. A selection of notable papers includes:

  • "Farmers' willingness to pay for digital and conventional credit: Insight from a discrete choice experiment in Madagascar" (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • "Taking the ontological and materialist turns: Agential realism, representation theory, and accounting information systems" (2020, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems)
  • "Farmers' awareness of digital credit: Does financial literacy matter?" (2023, Journal of International Development)
  • "Risk-contingent credit for sovereign disaster risk finance" (2021, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction)
  • "Constructs and Indicators: An Ontological Analysis" (2021, MIS Quarterly)

Their collaboration network includes several frequent co-authors with whom they have published multiple works. Among them are:

  • Oliver Mußhoff
  • Yaw Sarfo
  • Michael Danne
  • Jana Uher
  • Jan Ketil Arnulf

Publication venues reflect a focus on information systems and development-oriented journals. The most common journals where their research appears include:

  • International Journal of Accounting Information Systems
  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of International Development
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Their research covers several subfields, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their work. These subfields include:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Key thematic areas of their research focus on:

  • Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Auction Theory and Applications

Best Publications

  • Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling--A Research Agenda

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • An ontological model of an information system

    Y. Wand;R. Weber

  • On the deep structure of information systems

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • Information Systems Control and Audit

    Ron A. Weber

  • Ontological foundations of information systems

    Ron Weber

  • An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling

    Yair Wand;Veda C. Storey;Ron Weber

  • Research Commentary: Rethinking “Diversity” in Information Systems Research

    Izak Benbasat;Ron Weber

  • Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline

    Ronald Weber

  • Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests

    François Bodart;Arvind Patel;Marc Sim;Ron Weber

  • The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism :A Personal View

    Ronald Arthur Gerard Weber

  • Using ontology to validate conceptual models

    Graeme Shanks;Elizabeth Tansley;Ron Weber

  • Editor's comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view

    Ron Weber

  • Editor's comment: theoretically speaking

    Ron Weber

  • Still desperately seeking the IT artifact

    Ronald Arthur Gerard Weber

  • Conceptual modelling and ontology: Possibilities and pitfalls

    Ronald Arthur Gerard Weber

  • An ontological evaluation of systems analysis and design methods

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact

    Ron Weber

  • Mario Bunge's ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts

    Yair Wand;Ron Weber

  • EDP auditing : conceptual foundations and practice

    Ron Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Yair Wand
Yair Wand University of British Columbia
Graeme Shanks
Graeme Shanks University of Melbourne
Iris Vessey
Iris Vessey University of Queensland
John Leslie King
John Leslie King University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann Queensland University of Technology
Marta Indulska
Marta Indulska University of Queensland
Yanchun Zhang
Yanchun Zhang Victoria University
J. Leon Zhao
J. Leon Zhao Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Ramesh Sharda
Ramesh Sharda Oklahoma State University
Carol Saunders
Carol Saunders University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide variety of career paths. Popular fields include psychology, social work, counseling, and marriage & family therapy—all of which offer flexible online options for students worldwide.

Those interested in the mind and behavior can start with a psychology degree online, which gives foundational knowledge for roles in counseling, research, or community services. For those seeking to make a direct impact as a social worker, consider 1 year msw programs online no bsw. These programs are designed for career changers and can streamline your path to licensure.

Advanced careers, like practicing clinical psychology, require a doctorate. psyd programs online offer in-depth training and professional opportunities for those aiming to become licensed psychologists. Similarly, for a focused career in family and relationship therapy, lmft programs provide specialized credentials through convenient online study.

Overall, the flexibility of these online degrees allows working professionals or parents to balance their studies and life commitments while preparing for meaningful roles in the Social Sciences and Humanities sector.

Best Scientists Citing Ron Weber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles