World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
3972
World Ranking
11403
National Ranking
44

João Paulo A. Almeida publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where João Paulo A. Almeida sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 171 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

João Paulo A. Almeida D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where João Paulo A. Almeida sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

João Paulo A. Almeida is affiliated with the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo in Brazil. Their research covers various aspects of computer science with a focus on conceptual modeling, ontologies, and software engineering. Almeida's work intersects with fields such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Business, Management and Accounting.

The main fields of study for Almeida include:

  • Computer Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Their research spans several subfields, notably:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Management Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Software

Core topics addressed in Almeida's publications focus on:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

João Paulo A. Almeida has contributed to a range of journals and venues, including:

  • Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • Forma de Vida
  • Applied Ontology
  • Information and Software Technology

Several recent papers authored by or associated with Almeida are:

  • "UFO: Unified Foundational Ontology" (2021) published in Applied Ontology
  • "Types and taxonomic structures in conceptual modeling: A novel ontological theory and engineering support" (2021) published in Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • "From a Scrum Reference Ontology to the Integration of Applications for Data-Driven Software Development" (2021) published in Information and Software Technology
  • "CASTING THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF OPPOSITION ONTO HOHFELD'S FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTS" (2021) published in Legal Theory
  • "Multi-level conceptual modeling: Theory, language and application" (2021) published in Data & Knowledge Engineering

The scientist has coauthored extensively with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Giancarlo Guizzardi (40 publications)
  • Tiago Prince Sales (15 publications)
  • Claudenir M. Fonseca (9 publications)
  • Rodrigo F. Calhau (8 publications)
  • Cristine Griffo (5 publications)

In addition to articles, Almeida has contributed to book publications, primarily through Springer Science+Business Media, with titles such as:

  • "Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing" (2022)
  • "Conceptual Modeling" (2023)
  • "The Semantic Web - ISWC 2022" (2022)

Best Publications

  • Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: The unified foundational ontology (UFO) story

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner;João Paulo Andrade Almeida;Renata S. S. Guizzardi

  • Towards Ontological Foundations for the Conceptual Modeling of Events

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner;Ricardo Almeida Falbo;Renata S. Guizzardi

  • UFO: Unified Foundational Ontology

    Unknown

  • Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture

    Carlos L.B. Azevedo;Maria-Eugenia Iacob;João Paulo A. Almeida;Marten van Sinderen

  • Transparent dynamic reconfiguration for CORBA

    J.P.A. Almeida;M. Wegdam;M. van Sinderen;L. Nieuwenhuis

  • A commitment-based reference ontology for services

    Julio Cesar Nardi;Ricardo de Almeida Falbo;João Paulo A. Almeida;Giancarlo Guizzardi

  • The Common Ontology of Value and Risk

    Tiago Prince Sales;Fernanda Araujo Baião;Giancarlo Guizzardi;João Paulo A. Almeida

  • On the notion of abstract platform in MDA development

    J.P. Almeida;R. Dijkman;M. van Sinderen;L.F. Pires

  • Endurant Types in Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modeling: Towards OntoUML 2.0

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Giancarlo Guizzardi;Claudenir M. Fonseca;Alessander Botti Benevides;João Paulo A. Almeida

  • Situations in Conceptual Modeling of Context

    Patricia Costa;Giancarlo Guizzardi;Joao A. Almeida;Luis Pires

  • Toward a well-founded theory for multi-level conceptual modeling

    Victorio Albani de Carvalho;Victorio Albani de Carvalho;João Paulo A. Almeida

  • OntoUML Lightweight Editor: A Model-Based Environment to Build, Evaluate and Implement Reference Ontologies

    John Guerson;Tiago Prince Sales;Giancarlo Guizzardi;Joao Paulo A. Almeida

  • Ontological Considerations About the Representation of Events and Endurants in Business Models

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Nicola Guarino;João Paulo A. Almeida

  • An Ontology-Based Semantics for the Motivation Extension to ArchiMate

    Carlos L.B. Azevedo;Joao Paulo A. Almeida;Marten van Sinderen;Dick Quartel

  • An ontology-based analysis and semantics for organizational structure modeling in the ARIS method

    Paulo SéRgio Santos;JoãO Paulo A. Almeida;Giancarlo Guizzardi

  • Validating Modal Aspects of OntoUML Conceptual Models Using Automatically Generated Visual World Structures

    Alessander Botti Benevides;Giancarlo Guizzardi;Bernardo Ferreira Bastos Braga;Joao Paulo Andrade Almeida

  • Requirements engineering based on business process models: A case study

    Evellin Cristine Souza Cardoso;Joao Paulo A. Almeida;Giancarlo Guizzardi

  • Transforming OntoUML into Alloy: towards conceptual model validation using a lightweight formal method

    Bernardo F. B. Braga;João Paulo Andrade Almeida;Giancarlo Guizzardi;Alessander B. Benevides

  • Empowering enterprises through next-generation enterprise computing

    Marten van Sinderen;Joao Paulo A. Almeida

  • Towards a Commitment-Based Reference Ontology for Services

    Julio Cesar Nardi;Ricardo De Almeida Falbo;Joao Paulo A. Almeida;Giancarlo Guizzardi

  • An ontological analysis of the notion of community in the RM-ODP enterprise language

    JoãO Paulo A. Almeida;Giancarlo Guizzardi

Frequent Co-Authors

Giancarlo Guizzardi
Giancarlo Guizzardi University of Twente
Marten van Sinderen
Marten van Sinderen University of Twente
Remco Dijkman
Remco Dijkman Eindhoven University of Technology
Nicola Guarino
Nicola Guarino National Research Council (CNR)
Geert Poels
Geert Poels Ghent University
Gerd Wagner
Gerd Wagner Brandenburg University of Technology
Mathias Ekstedt
Mathias Ekstedt Royal Institute of Technology
Manuel Wimmer
Manuel Wimmer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Florian Matthes
Florian Matthes Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in computer science? Flexible education options are more accessible than ever. Many students are turning to affordable online courses to start earning credits and valuable skills—ideal for budget-conscious learners.

Worried about past academic performance? There are several college with low gpa admission requirements, offering a second chance to passionate students eager to break into tech.

An online degree isn't just about flexibility; it can also lead to diverse career options. While computer science opens doors to roles in software development, data analysis, and cybersecurity, a technical background can complement other fields. For example, those interested in environmental issues may want to explore what can you do with an environmental studies degree, which often integrates advanced technology skills for modern problem-solving.

In addition, students seeking a faster route can consider online computer science degree programs that are accelerated, allowing you to graduate and enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing João Paulo A. Almeida

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles