World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
9014
World Ranking
5155
National Ranking
235

Gerd Wagner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerd Wagner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 267 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gerd Wagner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerd Wagner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerd Wagner is affiliated with Brandenburg University of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on subfields including Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's work spans several main topics such as Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Simulation Techniques and Applications, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Spectroscopy and Laser Applications, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, and Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis.

Gerd Wagner has authored papers published in a variety of venues, including:

  • Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
  • 2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)
  • 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)
  • Experimental Physiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "The pressure dependence of the experimentally-determined line intensity and continuum absorption of pure CO2 in the 1.6µm region" (2024), Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
  • "Business Process Modeling and Simulation with DPMN: Processing Activities" (2021), 2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)
  • "Resource Modeling in Business Process Simulation" (2022), 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)
  • "Liver iron stores and effectors of ferroptosis are dependent on age and sex" (2024), Experimental Physiology
  • "Activation of Heme Metabolism Promotes Tissue Health After Intraarticular Injury or Surgical Exposure" (2024), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers including Giancarlo Guizzardi, Manfred Birk, Christian Röske, Paolo Bocciarelli, and Andrea D' Ambrogio.

In addition to journal publications, Gerd Wagner has contributed to book publications, with at least one book published by Springer International Publishing titled Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (2023).

Best Publications

  • Design rationale of RuleML: a markup language for semantic web rules

    Harold Boley;Said Tabet;Gerd Wagner

  • Design Rationale for RuleML: A Markup Language for Semantic Web Rules.

    Harold Boley;Said Tabet;Gerd Wagner

  • The agent-object-relationship metamodel: towards a unified view of state and behavior

    Gerd Wagner

  • Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: The unified foundational ontology (UFO) story

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner;João Paulo Andrade Almeida;Renata S. S. Guizzardi

  • Ontologies, Meta-models, and the Model-Driven Paradigm

    Uwe Aßmann;Steffen Zschaler;Gerd Wagner

  • Structural brain alterations in patients with major depressive disorder and high risk for suicide: evidence for a distinct neurobiological entity?

    Gerd Wagner;Kathrin Koch;Claudia Schachtzabel;C. Christoph Schultz

  • Towards Ontological Foundations for the Conceptual Modeling of Events

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner;Ricardo Almeida Falbo;Renata S. Guizzardi

  • White matter abnormalities and brain activation in schizophrenia: A combined DTI and fMRI study

    Ralf G.M. Schlösser;Igor Nenadic;Igor Nenadic;Gerd Wagner;Daniel Güllmar

  • Ontologies and the Semantic Web for E-learning (Guest editorial).

    Demetrios G. Sampson;Miltiadis D. Lytras;Gerd Wagner;Paloma Díaz

  • Fronto-cingulate effective connectivity in major depression: a study with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

    Ralf G. M. Schlösser;Gerd Wagner;Kathrin Koch;R. Dahnke

  • Functional connectivity and network analysis of midbrain and brainstem nuclei.

    Karl-Jürgen Bär;Feliberto de la Cruz;Andy Schumann;Stefanie Koehler

  • Computational meta-analysis of statistical parametric maps in major depression

    Danilo Arnone;Dominic Job;Sudhakar Selvaraj;Osamu Abe

  • An ontologically well-founded profile for UML conceptual models

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner;Nicola Guarino;Marten van Sinderen

  • On the General Ontological foundations of conceptual modeling

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Heinrich Herre;Gerd Wagner

  • Using the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) as a Foundation for General Conceptual Modeling Languages

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner

  • A Unified Foundational Ontology and some Applications of it in Business Modeling.

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner

  • Ontologies and the semantic web for E-learning

    DG Sampson;Lytras;GR Gerd Wagner;P Diaz

  • Altered activation in association with reward-related trial-and-error learning in patients with schizophrenia.

    Kathrin Koch;Claudia Schachtzabel;Gerd Wagner;Julia Schikora

  • Fronto-cingulate effective connectivity in obsessive compulsive disorder: a study with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

    Ralf G.M. Schlösser;Gerd Wagner;Claudia Schachtzabel;Gregor Peikert

  • Altered resting-state functional connectome in major depressive disorder: a mega-analysis from the PsyMRI consortium

    Nooshin Javaheripour;Meng Li;Tara Chand;Axel Krug;Axel Krug

  • Towards ontological foundations for agent modelling concepts using the unified fundational ontology (UFO)

    Giancarlo Guizzardi;Gerd Wagner

  • Vivid Logic: Knowledge-Based Reasoning with Two Kinds of Negation

    Gerd Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

Giancarlo Guizzardi
Giancarlo Guizzardi University of Twente
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University
Grigoris Antoniou
Grigoris Antoniou University of Huddersfield
Marek Hatala
Marek Hatala Simon Fraser University
Lora Aroyo
Lora Aroyo Google (United States)
Vladan Devedžić
Vladan Devedžić University of Belgrade
Steffen Staab
Steffen Staab University of Stuttgart
Gal A. Kaminka
Gal A. Kaminka Bar-Ilan University
Demetrios G. Sampson
Demetrios G. Sampson University of Piraeus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open multiple pathways for students interested in Computer Science. If you're looking to advance your career quickly, consider researching the quickest online masters degree options available. These accelerated programs allow you to earn your credentials and enter the workforce faster than traditional timelines.

Choosing the right specialization is also important. Explore what masters program should I do for in-demand skills and high employability in technology sectors. Whether you prefer software engineering, data analytics, or cybersecurity, there is a wealth of focus areas to match your interests and career goals.

For those starting out, associates degrees online offer flexible and affordable entry points into Computer Science. These can be a great first step toward pursuing a bachelor’s degree or entering tech-support roles.

Affordability matters too. Discover affordable online degree programs to help you minimize debt while gaining quality education. Balancing cost, flexibility, and program reputation is key to a successful learning journey in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Gerd Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles