World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
14849
World Ranking
9163
National Ranking
4065

Conrad Wagner publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conrad Wagner sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 186 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Conrad Wagner D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conrad Wagner sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Conrad Wagner is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily published in the journal Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft, with two recorded papers in recent years.

The research topics covered by Wagner include aspects of occupational safety and health with a focus on chemical and biological risk assessment tools. The following papers have been published:

  • Gefährdungsbeurteilung im Arbeitsschutz mithilfe der GESTIS-Stoffdatenbank und der GESTIS-Biostoffdatenbank, 2021, Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft
  • Tagungsbericht ISES 2022, 2022, Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft

Wagner has collaborated with other researchers in this field, including frequent coauthor Dorothea Koppisch.

The venues of publication indicate a focus on environmental hygiene, air quality, and hazardous substances.

Best Publications

  • BIOCHEMICAL ROLE OF FOLATE IN CELLULAR METABOLISM

    Conrad Wagner

  • Loss of the glycine N-methyltransferase gene leads to steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice†

    M. Luz Martínez-Chantar;Mercedes Vázquez-Chantada;Usue Ariz;Nuria Martínez

  • DNA methylation in folate deficiency: use of CpG methylase.

    M. Balaghi;C. Wagner

  • Regulation of Methylbenzoate Emission after Pollination in Snapdragon and Petunia Flowers

    Florence Negre;Christine M. Kish;Jennifer Boatright;Beverly Underwood

  • S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency in a human: A genetic disorder of methionine metabolism

    Ivo Barić;Ksenija Fumić;Byron Glenn;Mario Ćuk

  • Glycine N-methyltransferase and regulation of S-adenosylmethionine levels

    Zigmund Luka;S. Harvey Mudd;Conrad Wagner

  • Plasma S-adenosylhomocysteine is a more sensitive indicator of cardiovascular disease than plasma homocysteine

    David M Kerins;Mark J Koury;Antonieta Capdevila;Sarvadaman Rana

  • Liquid Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry-Based Parallel Metabolic Profiling of Human and Mouse Model Serum Reveals Putative Biomarkers Associated with the Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

    Jonathan Barr;Mercedes Vázquez-Chantada;Cristina Alonso;Miriam Pérez-Cormenzana

  • Methyl balance and transmethylation fluxes in humans

    S Harvey Mudd;John T Brosnan;Margaret E Brosnan;René L Jacobs

  • Inhibition of glycine N-methyltransferase activity by folate derivatives: implications for regulation of methyl group metabolism.

    Conrad Wagner;Conrad Wagner;William T. Briggs;Robert J. Cook

  • Impact of extracellular folate levels on global gene expression.

    Mona S. Jhaveri;Conrad Wagner;Jane B. Trepel

  • Adenosine Kinase Deficiency Is Associated with Developmental Abnormalities and Reduced Transmethylation

    Barbara A. Moffatt;Yvonne Y. Stevens;Michael S. Allen;Jamie D. Snider

  • The Arabidopsis HOMOLOGY-DEPENDENT GENE SILENCING1 Gene Codes for an S-Adenosyl-l-Homocysteine Hydrolase Required for DNA Methylation-Dependent Gene Silencing

    Pedro S.C.F. Rocha;Mazhar Sheikh;Rosalba Melchiorre;Mathilde Fagard

  • Glycine N-methyltransferase is a folate binding protein of rat liver cytosol.

    Robert J. Cook;Conrad Wagner

  • Glycine N-methyltransferase deficiency: a novel inborn error causing persistent isolated hypermethioninaemia.

    S. H. Mudd;R. Cerone;M. C. Schiaffino;A. R. Fantasia

  • Tissue distribution of glycine N-methyltransferase, a major folate-binding protein of liver

    Eui-Ju Yeo;Conrad Wagner

  • Hepatic one-carbon metabolism in early folate deficiency in rats

    M Balaghi;D W Horne;C Wagner

  • A glycine N-methyltransferase knockout mouse model for humans with deficiency of this enzyme.

    Zigmund Luka;Antonieta Capdevila;José M. Mato;C. Wagner

  • Candidate biomarkers in exosome‐like vesicles purified from rat and mouse urine samples

    Javier Conde-Vancells;Eva Rodriguez-Suarez;Esperanza Gonzalez;Agustin Berisa

  • Enzymatic properties of dimethylglycine dehydrogenase and sarcosine dehydrogenase from rat liver

    David H. Porter;Robert J. Cook;Conrad Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

José M. Mato
José M. Mato CIC bioGUNE
Sally P. Stabler
Sally P. Stabler University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Shelly C. Lu
Shelly C. Lu Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Robert H. Allen
Robert H. Allen University of Colorado Denver
S. Harvey Mudd
S. Harvey Mudd MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Steven H. Zeisel
Steven H. Zeisel University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wei Zheng
Wei Zheng Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Mario F. Fraga
Mario F. Fraga University of Oviedo
Xiao-Ou Shu
Xiao-Ou Shu Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Manel Esteller
Manel Esteller Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of health and science careers. Many students choose flexible online study options to gain industry credentials and hands-on experience. For example, those interested in medical imaging can explore online radiology programs that combine foundational science with practical skills.

Nutrition and dietetics is another promising field. Graduates wishing to become nutrition experts can look into registered dietitian masters programs for advanced training and board certification.

Students seeking to enter the medical workforce quickly may consider medical assistant classes online with financial aid. These programs are designed to be accessible and affordable, enabling fast entry into healthcare roles.

For those who want to expand their clinical responsibilities, there are also options to advance from medical assistant to nurse. Programs such as ma to lpn offer flexible, online pathways to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse.

Each of these online degrees and career pathways leverages your biology background, helping you take the next step in the health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Conrad Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles