World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
74904
World Ranking
9836
National Ranking
5057

Frank W. Sellke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Sellke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 792 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank W. Sellke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Sellke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank W. Sellke is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their academic work is primarily situated in the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other notable areas of study include Molecular Biology, Surgery, Physiology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their research topics span multiple aspects of cardiovascular health and disease, including:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Frank W. Sellke are:

  • 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary (2021), published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 patients: Risk factors, predictors, and complications: A review (2020), published in the Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • Cell-Type Transcriptome Atlas of Human Aortic Valves Reveal Cell Heterogeneity and Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition Involved in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease (2020), published in Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • The urgent need for integrated science to fight COVID-19 pandemic and beyond (2020), published in the Journal of Translational Medicine
  • Health position paper and redox perspectives on reactive oxygen species as signals and targets of cardioprotection (2023), published in Redox Biology

The frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Dwight D. Harris
  • M. Ruhul Abid
  • Sharif A. Sabe
  • Jun Feng
  • Cynthia Xu

Frank W. Sellke has contributed extensively to well-known scientific journals specializing in cardiovascular and surgical research. These venues include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Surgery
  • Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • JTCVS Open

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Neil J Stone;Jennifer G Robinson;Alice H. Lichtenstein;C Noel Bairey Merz

  • Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia

    Sharon E. Maynard;Jiang Yong Min;Jaime Merchan;Kee Hak Lim

  • Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Philip B. Gorelick;Angelo Scuteri;Sandra E. Black;Charles Decarli

  • Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.

    Shivalingappa Venkatesha;Mourad Toporsian;Chun Lam;Jun-ichi Hanai

  • Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal

    Charles V. Pollack;Paul A. Reilly;John Eikelboom;Stephan Glund

  • Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication ☆ ☆☆ ★: A Scientific Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Council on Stroke

    Jerry P. Nolan;Robert W. Neumar;Christophe Adrie;Mayuki Aibiki

  • Post–Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

    Robert W. Neumar;Jerry P. Nolan;Christophe Adrie;Mayuki Aibiki

  • 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Rick A. Nishimura;Catherine M. Otto;Robert O. Bonow;Blase A. Carabello

  • Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal — Full Cohort Analysis

    Charles V. Pollack;Paul A. Reilly;Joanne van Ryn;John W. Eikelboom

  • Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline Recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

    Jeffrey L. Anderson;Jonathan L. Halperin;Nancy M. Albert;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Clinical Trials in Coronary Angiogenesis: Issues, Problems, Consensus An Expert Panel Summary

    M. Simons;R. O. Bonow;N. A. Chronos;D. J. Cohen

  • Local Perivascular Delivery of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results of a Phase I Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Roger J. Laham;Frank W. Sellke;Elazer R. Edelman;Justin D. Pearlman

  • Derivation and validation of a preoperative prediction rule for delirium after cardiac surgery.

    James L. Rudolph;Richard N. Jones;Sue E. Levkoff;Sue E. Levkoff;Christopher Rockett

  • PR39, a peptide regulator of angiogenesis

    J Li;M Post;R Volk;Y Gao

  • Magnetic resonance mapping demonstrates benefits of VEGF–induced myocardial angiogenesis

    Justin D. Pearlman;Mark G. Hibberd;Mark G. Hibberd;Michael L. Chuang;Michael L. Chuang;Kazumasa Harada;Kazumasa Harada

  • Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Compilation of 2006 ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Recommendations) A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Jeffrey L. Anderson;Jonathan L. Halperin;Nancy M. Albert;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor administration in chronic myocardial ischemia

    K. Harada;M. Friedman;J. J. Lopez;S. Y. Wang

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor improves myocardial function in chronically ischemic porcine hearts.

    K Harada;W Grossman;M Friedman;E R Edelman

  • Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) could contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia

    Sharon E. Maynard;Jiang-Yong Min;Jaime Merchan;Kee-Hak Lim

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Simons
Michael Simons Yale University
Marc Ruel
Marc Ruel University of Ottawa
David G. Harrison
David G. Harrison Vanderbilt University
Jerrold H. Levy
Jerrold H. Levy Duke University
Robert A. Guyton
Robert A. Guyton Emory University
Charles V. Pollack
Charles V. Pollack Thomas Jefferson University
Kathleen G. Morgan
Kathleen G. Morgan Boston University
Csaba Szabó
Csaba Szabó University of Fribourg
Anny Usheva
Anny Usheva Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. With the healthcare sector rapidly evolving, students often explore online pathways that offer flexibility and accelerated options. For those starting their career in nursing, online lpn programs provide a convenient path to become a Licensed Practical Nurse, combining online coursework with essential clinical experience.

Registered nurses aiming to advance their expertise may consider bsn to np programs online. These programs allow nurses to become Nurse Practitioners, often specializing in high-demand areas like psychiatric-mental health.

Beyond direct patient care, there are significant opportunities in healthcare management. Earning a health care administration degree online prepares graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Those seeking advanced leadership positions can benefit from exploring affordable online mha programs. A Master’s in Healthcare Administration (MHA) is a valuable credential for those pursuing executive or policy-making roles in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Frank W. Sellke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles