World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
20054
World Ranking
16800
National Ranking
704

Marc Ruel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Ruel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 610 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marc Ruel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Ruel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Ruel is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research spans multiple aspects of medicine, focusing primarily on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. With a total of 452 publications in medicine, their work emphasizes surgical procedures, cardiology-specific diagnostics, and treatments.

The major subfields of their studies include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Marc Ruel's research topics cover a wide range of cardiac-related areas, illustrating the specific scope within cardiovascular medicine:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Their recent notable papers include:

  • 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes, 2024, European Heart Journal
  • 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2025, Circulation
  • Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • Correction to: 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2025, Circulation
  • 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes, 2025, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Marc Ruel frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Joseph F. Sabik
  • John Calhoon
  • Thomas E. MacGillivray
  • Kevin Accola
  • Vinod H. Thourani

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Circulation
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Current Opinion in Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry.

    Henrique B. Ribeiro;John G. Webb;Raj R. Makkar;Mauricio G. Cohen

  • Secondary Prevention After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Alexander Kulik;Marc Ruel;Hani Jneid;T. Bruce Ferguson

  • Adverse effects associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of contemporary studies.

    Prateek J. Khatri;John G. Webb;Josep Rodés-Cabau;Stephen E. Fremes

  • Mechanisms, Consequences, and Prevention of Coronary Graft Failure.

    M Gaudino;C Antoniades;U Benedetto;S Deb

  • Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression

    Marc Ruel;Hussam Al-Faleh;Alexander Kulik;Kwan L. Chan

  • Skeletonized Internal Thoracic Artery Harvest Reduces Pain and Dysesthesia and Improves Sternal Perfusion After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery A Randomized, Double-Blind, Within-Patient Comparison

    Munir Boodhwani;B. Khanh Lam;Howard J. Nathan;Thierry G. Mesana

  • Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

    Subodh Verma;Subodh Verma;Michael E Farkouh;Michael E Farkouh;Michael E Farkouh;Bobby Yanagawa;David H Fitchett;David H Fitchett

  • Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

    Joseph T. McGinn;Saif Usman;Harry Lapierre;Vijayasimha R. Pothula

  • Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Alone After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting The Clopidogrel After Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease (CASCADE) Trial

    Alexander Kulik;Michel R. Le May;Pierre Voisine;Jean-Claude Tardif

  • Late cardiac death in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: incidence and predictors of advanced heart failure and sudden cardiac death.

    Marina Urena;John G. Webb;Helene Eltchaninoff;Antonio J. Muñoz-García

  • Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with mitral prosthetic valves.

    Marc Ruel;Fraser D. Rubens;Roy G. Masters;Andrew L. Pipe

  • The HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) Study: The design of a large, simple randomized trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) and vitamin E in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events

    F Mindlen;R Nordaby;M Ruiz;A Zavala

  • Very long-term survival implications of heart valve replacement with tissue versus mechanical prostheses in adults <60 years of age.

    Marc Ruel;Vincent Chan;Pierre Bédard;Alexander Kulik

  • Tissue-engineered injectable collagen-based matrices for improved cell delivery and vascularization of ischemic tissue using CD133+ progenitors expanded from the peripheral blood.

    Erik J. Suuronen;John P. Veinot;Serena Wong;Varun Kapila

  • Long-term effects of surgical angiogenic therapy with fibroblast growth factor 2 protein

    Marc Ruel;Roger J. Laham;J.Anthony Parker;Mark J. Post

  • Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves

    Marc Ruel;Alexander Kulik;Fraser D Rubens;Pierre Bédard

  • Cardiovascular progenitor-derived extracellular vesicles recapitulate the beneficial effects of their parent cells in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

    Anaïs Kervadec;Anaïs Kervadec;Valérie Bellamy;Valérie Bellamy;Nadia El Harane;Nadia El Harane;Lousineh Arakélian

  • Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.

    Alexander Kulik;Pierre Bédard;B-Khanh Lam;Fraser D Rubens

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement

    John Webb;Josep Rodés-Cabau;Stephen Fremes;Philippe Pibarot

  • Adverse Effects Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Prateek J. Khatri;John G. Webb;Josep Rodés-Cabau;Stephen E. Fremes

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank W. Sellke
Frank W. Sellke Brown University
Stephen E. Fremes
Stephen E. Fremes University of Toronto
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau Université Laval
Rob S. Beanlands
Rob S. Beanlands University of Ottawa
May Griffith
May Griffith University of Montreal
David P. Taggart
David P. Taggart University of Oxford
John G. Webb
John G. Webb University of British Columbia
Subodh Verma
Subodh Verma University of Toronto
Francesco Maisano
Francesco Maisano University of Zurich
Marco Barbanti
Marco Barbanti Kore University of Enna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing healthcare careers that complement or provide alternatives to a traditional medical degree, a growing number of flexible, affordable online programs are available. These pathways can lead to rewarding roles in patient care, healthcare management, and medical support services.

One popular entry point is in medical billing and coding, a vital field for healthcare administration. The medical coding certification cost varies depending on the program, but there are options that balance value and comprehensive training.

Nursing is another rewarding field with several online degree options. Those aiming for an advanced clinical role should explore online nurse practitioner programs designed to accommodate working professionals. Budget-conscious students can also consider the cheapest online msn programs to earn a Master of Science in Nursing without high tuition costs.

For those seeking research or academic leadership, an online phd nursing can lead to advanced career opportunities in education and healthcare policy. These online pathways enable students to balance life commitments while expanding their career prospects within the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Ruel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles