World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
31765
World Ranking
13979
National Ranking
7095

John D. Puskas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Puskas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 435 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John D. Puskas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Puskas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John D. Puskas is affiliated with Mount Sinai Hospital in the United States. Their work focuses primarily on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and biomedical engineering.

Their research covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

John D. Puskas has authored and co-authored numerous scientific papers. Selected recent publications include:

  • Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft With Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, 2020, JAMA
  • Apixaban or Warfarin in Patients with an On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve, 2023, NEJM Evidence
  • Five-year Outcomes of the COMMENCE Trial Investigating Aortic Valve Replacement With RESILIA Tissue, 2022, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • 2021: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Document: Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure, 2021, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Effect of total arterial grafting in the Arterial Revascularization Trial, 2020, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors, among whom the most frequent include:

  • David P. Taggart
  • Patrick W. Serruys
  • Mario Gaudino
  • Yoshinobu Onuma
  • Jagat Narula

Best Publications

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Joseph F. Sabik;Patrick W. Serruys;Charles A. Simonton

  • Mitral-Valve Repair versus Replacement for Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

    Michael A. Acker;Michael K. Parides;Louis P. Perrault;Alan J. Moskowitz

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;John A. Bittl;Charles R. Bridges

  • Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting

    J.D. Puskas;W.H. Williams;P.G. Duke;J.R. Staples

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation

    Robert E. Michler;Peter K. Smith;Michael K. Parides;Gorav Ailawadi

  • Devices and methods for vagus nerve stimulation

    John D. Puskas

  • Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial.

    John D. Puskas;Willis H. Williams;Elizabeth M. Mahoney;Philip R. Huber

  • Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;A. Pieter Kappetein;Joseph F. Sabik;Stuart J. Pocock

  • Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation during Mitral-Valve Surgery

    A Marc Gillinov;Annetine C Gelijns;Michael K Parides;Joseph J DeRose

  • Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery

    Mario Gaudino;Umberto Benedetto;Stephen Fremes;Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai

  • Surgical Treatment of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

    Peter K. Smith;John D. Puskas;Deborah D. Ascheim;Pierre Voisine

  • New-onset atrial fibrillation predicts long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft.

    Mikhael F. El-Chami;Patrick Kilgo;Vinod Thourani;Omar M. Lattouf

  • Methods of indirectly stimulating the vagus nerve with an electrical field

    John D. Puskas

  • Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years.

    David P Taggart;Umberto Benedetto;Stephen Gerry;Douglas G Altman

  • Elevated preoperative hemoglobin A1c level is predictive of adverse events after coronary artery bypass surgery

    Michael E. Halkos;John D. Puskas;Omar M. Lattouf;Patrick Kilgo

  • Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Disproportionately Benefits High-Risk Patients

    John D. Puskas;Vinod H. Thourani;Patrick Kilgo;William Cooper

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • Off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial

    J.D Puskas;W.H Williams;E.M Mahoney

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Guyton
Robert A. Guyton Emory University
David P. Taggart
David P. Taggart University of Oxford
Vinod H. Thourani
Vinod H. Thourani Georgetown University
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Joseph F. Sabik
Joseph F. Sabik University Hospitals of Cleveland
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David E. Kandzari
David E. Kandzari Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
Patrick T. O'Gara
Patrick T. O'Gara Brigham and Women's Hospital
Peter K. Smith
Peter K. Smith Duke University
Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, online degree options open up diverse healthcare career pathways. Many healthcare roles, such as nurse practitioners, healthcare administrators, and advanced practice nurses, are accessible via accredited online programs. The shortest online pmhnp programs offer a fast-track for registered nurses seeking specialization in psychiatric mental health, often allowing completion in just 18-24 months.

Costs are an important consideration. Comparing options can help you find a healthcare administration degree cost that fits your budget. Affordable online degrees can let you enter management roles without taking on excessive debt.

For those eyeing advanced leadership in healthcare, pursuing affordable affordable mha online programs can lead to executive positions and policy roles. Similarly, cheap online dnp programs make it possible for nurses to attain the highest clinical qualification without incurring excessive expenses.

Exploring these online degrees can help you carve out a unique pathway in the medical field—while balancing educational quality, speed, and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Puskas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles