World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Seung-Jung Park

Seung-Jung Park

Award Badge
Medicine
Korea
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
57450
World Ranking
3866
National Ranking
4

Seung-Jung Park publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seung-Jung Park sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,518 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Seung-Jung Park D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seung-Jung Park sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Korea Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Korea Leader Award

Overview

Seung-Jung Park is affiliated with the University of Ulsan in South Korea and has made substantial contributions in the field of medicine, particularly focusing on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans several subfields including surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, epidemiology, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's research topics primarily encompass coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, acute myocardial infarction research, antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular diseases, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, and atrial fibrillation management and outcomes.

Seung-Jung Park has published extensively in prominent journals, with frequent publication venues including:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC Asia
  • Circulation

Their recent research outputs demonstrate a focus on coronary artery disease and interventions. Selected recent papers include:

  • Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques, 2024, The Lancet
  • Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention, 2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation, 2020, The Lancet

Seung-Jung Park collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including Duk-Woo Park, Do-Yoon Kang, Jung-Min Ahn, Pil Hyung Lee, and Hanbit Park. Collaboration counts indicate extensive research partnerships, with Duk-Woo Park having 142 coauthored works with Seung-Jung Park.

Best Publications

  • Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis

    Christoph Stettler;Christoph Stettler;Simon Wandel;Sabin Allemann;Adnan Kastrati

  • Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

    Bjarne L Nørgaard;Jonathon Leipsic;Sara Gaur;Sujith Seneviratne

  • Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

    Ik-Kyung Jang;Brett E. Bouma;Dong-Heon Kang;Dong-Heon Kang;Seung-Jung Park

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT Angiography

    James K. Min;Jonathon Leipsic;Michael J. Pencina;Daniel S. Berman

  • In Vivo Diagnosis of Plaque Erosion and Calcified Nodule in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome by Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography

    Haibo Jia;Farhad Abtahian;Aaron D. Aguirre;Stephen Lee

  • Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease.

    Seung Jung Park;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park;Sung Cheol Yun

  • Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents

    Seung-Jung Park;Duk-Woo Park;Young-Hak Kim;Soo-Jin Kang

  • Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies

    Ajay J. Kirtane;Anuj Gupta;Srinivas Iyengar;Jeffrey W. Moses

  • Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

    Stuart J. Head;Milan Milojevic;Joost Daemen;Jung Min Ahn

  • A Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis

    Seung Jung Park;Won Heum Shim;David S. Ho;Albert E. Raizner

  • Stents versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Ki Bae Seung;Duk-Woo Park;Young-Hak Kim;Seung-Whan Lee

  • Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with bare metal stent implantation.

    Seung Jung Park;Young Hak Kim;Bong Ki Lee;Seung Whan Lee

  • Frequency of and risk factors for stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation during long-term follow-up.

    Duk Woo Park;Seong Wook Park;Kyoung Ha Park;Bong Ki Lee

  • Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

    Seung Jung Park;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park;Seung Whan Lee

  • Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease

    Seung Jung Park;Jung Min Ahn;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park

  • Cryptogenic Stroke and High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial

    Pil Hyung Lee;Jae Kwan Song;Jae Kwan Song;Jong S. Kim;Ran Heo

  • Late Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation An Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis With Long-Term Follow-Up

    Myeong Ki Hong;Gary S. Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee;Duk Woo Park

  • Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in the subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction: A collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Jacob A. Udell;Jacob A. Udell;Marc P. Bonaca;Jean Philippe Collet;A. Michael Lincoff

  • In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis: A Final Common Pathway of Late Stent Failure

    Seung-Jung Park;Soo-Jin Kang;Renu Virmani;Masataka Nakano

  • Comparison of coronary plaque rupture between stable angina and acute myocardial infarction: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study in 235 patients.

    Myeong Ki Hong;Gary S. Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee;Young Hak Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Young-Hak Kim
Young-Hak Kim Asan Medical Center
Duk-Woo Park
Duk-Woo Park University of Ulsan
Cheol Whan Lee
Cheol Whan Lee Asan Medical Center
Seung-Whan Lee
Seung-Whan Lee Asan Medical Center
Seong Wook Park
Seong Wook Park University of Ulsan
Jong-Young Lee
Jong-Young Lee Sungkyunkwan University
Yangsoo Jang
Yangsoo Jang Yonsei University
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Jong-Young Lee
Jong-Young Lee Ministry of Health and Welfare
Hyo-Soo Kim
Hyo-Soo Kim Seoul National University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare careers beyond the traditional MD path. Many students are now considering flexible, online alternatives that allow for quicker entry into growing fields.

For those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs offer a direct route to advanced nursing roles. These accelerated programs can let you earn a master’s in nursing without repeating undergraduate coursework.

Another accessible pathway is through adn programs, which typically have lower entry requirements and can be a cost-effective step towards a nursing career.

If you’re interested in administrative or coding roles, you may be asking: can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? Many accredited online schools do provide financial support, making this career more accessible than ever.

Wondering about entrance exams? Not all schools require them—do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school depends on the program. Some nursing schools waive these exams, offering a smoother application process.

Best Scientists Citing Seung-Jung Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles