World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
45
Citations
13092
World Ranking
1727
National Ranking
1021

Peter M. DeMarzo publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. DeMarzo sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 110 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Peter M. DeMarzo D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. DeMarzo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellows of the Econometric Society
  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Finance Association (AFA)

Overview

Peter M. DeMarzo is a researcher primarily affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their work spans the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a pronounced focus on several subfields including Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Safety Research, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The research topics that Peter M. DeMarzo has contributed to include:

  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Global Financial Crisis and Policies
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Economic theories and models
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Economic Policies and Impacts

Peter M. DeMarzo's frequent co-authors include:

  • Zhiguo He
  • Fabrice Tourre
  • Ron Kaniel
  • Arvind Krishnamurthy
  • Stefan Nagel

Publications by Peter M. DeMarzo have appeared in a range of academic venues, with multiple contributions to the SSRN Electronic Journal, The Journal of Finance, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Financial Studies, and Harvard Dataverse.

Recent papers by the researcher include:

  • Contracting in Peer Networks, 2023, The Journal of Finance
  • Sovereign Debt Ratchets and Welfare Destruction, 2023, Journal of Political Economy
  • Portfolio Liquidity and Security Design with Private Information, 2020, Review of Financial Studies
  • Leverage Dynamics without Commitment, 2020, The Journal of Finance
  • Interest Rate Risk in Banking, 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal

Peter M. DeMarzo has received professional recognition including the Fellows of the Econometric Society in 2020 and the Fellow of the American Finance Association (AFA) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity Is Not Expensive

    Anat R. Admati;Peter M. DeMarzo;Martin F. Hellwig;Paul Pfleiderer

  • Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Dimitri Vayanos;Jeffrey Zwiebel

  • Corporate Incentives for Hedging and Hedge Accounting

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Darrell Duffie

  • A liquidity-based model of security design

    Peter Demarzo;Darrell Duffie

  • The Pooling and Tranching of Securities: A Model of Informed Intermediation

    Peter M. DeMarzo

  • Optimal Security Design and Dynamic Capital Structure in a Continuous‐Time Agency Model

    Peter M. DeMARZO;Yuliy Sannikov

  • Leverage, Moral Hazard, and Liquidity

    Viral V. Acharya;S. Viswanathan

  • Optimal long-term financial contracting

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Michael J. Fishman

  • Dynamic Agency and the q Theory of Investment

    Peter M. Demarzo;Michael J. Fishman;Zhiguo He;Neng Wang

  • Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is Not Expensive

    Anat R. Admati;Peter M. DeMarzo;Martin F. Hellwig;Paul Pfleiderer

  • Corporate financial hedging with proprietary information

    Peter M DeMarzo;Darrell Duffie

  • Agency and Optimal Investment Dynamics

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Michael J. Fishman

  • Endogenous Information Flows and the Clustering of Announcements

    Viral V. Acharya;Peter M. DeMarzo;Ilan Kremer

  • The Leverage Ratchet Effect

    Anat R. Admati;Peter M. DeMarzo;Martin F. Hellwig;Paul C. Pfleiderer

  • Bidding with Securities: Auctions and Security Design

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Ilan Kremer;Andrzej Skrzypacz

  • Relative Wealth Concerns and Financial Bubbles

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Ron Kaniel;Ilan Kremer

  • Diversification as a Public Good: Community Effects in Portfolio Choice

    Peter M. Demarzo;Ron Kaniel;Ilan Kremer

  • Sequential Banking

    Unknown

  • The Leverage Ratchet Effect: Leverage Ratchet Effect

    Anat R. Admati;Peter M. Demarzo;Martin F. Hellwig;Paul Pfleiderer

  • Self-Regulation and Government Oversight

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Michael J. Fishman;Kathleen M. Hagerty

  • Ownership Dynamics and Asset Pricing with a Large Shareholder

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Branko Urošević

  • Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Uni-Dimensional Opinions

    Peter M. DeMarzo;Peter M. DeMarzo;Jeffrey Zwiebel;Dimitri Vayanos;Dimitri Vayanos;Dimitri Vayanos

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Hellwig
Martin Hellwig Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Anat R. Admati
Anat R. Admati Stanford University
Zhiguo He
Zhiguo He Stanford University
Dimitri Vayanos
Dimitri Vayanos London School of Economics and Political Science
Darrell Duffie
Darrell Duffie Stanford University
Andrzej Skrzypacz
Andrzej Skrzypacz Stanford University
Yishay Mansour
Yishay Mansour Tel Aviv University
Viral V. Acharya
Viral V. Acharya New York University
Shane Greenstein
Shane Greenstein Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options in Economics and Finance opens doors to flexible, career-focused learning. A popular choice is a bachelor's in finance online, perfect for those seeking strong foundations in financial analysis, markets, and investment strategies.

For students interested in business leadership, earning an MBA has become more accessible than ever. You can accelerate your career by considering top accelerated mba programs that allow you to complete your degree in less time. If you dream of starting your own business, an online mba entrepreneurship program offers specialized knowledge on launching and managing ventures.

Project management is another highly relevant field, given its demand across industries. If you are wondering whether is a project management degree worth it, many professionals find it valuable for building leadership and organizational skills that complement an Economics or Finance background.

These pathways can expand your expertise, increase employability, and provide the flexibility needed to balance study with work or personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. DeMarzo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles