World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 26 2934 2658 102 98 64 1685

Fenja Klevenhusen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fenja Klevenhusen between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fenja Klevenhusen published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2018. 3 of the 70 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2018. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
2008 2026

70 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fenja Klevenhusen: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 4
2010 5
2011 5
2012 3
2013 2
2014 1
2015 6
2016 4
2017 6
2018 8
2019 6
2020 2
2021 2
2022 6
2023 2
2024 3
2025 2
2026 1
Total 70
Download as CSV

Fenja Klevenhusen publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fenja Klevenhusen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 64–68 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 64 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75 64
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Fenja Klevenhusen D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fenja Klevenhusen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 26 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80 26
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Fenja Klevenhusen is affiliated with the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment in Germany and specializes in agricultural and biological sciences. Their research primarily focuses on ruminant nutrition and digestive physiology, with additional interests in botanical research and chemistry, plant and fungal interactions, animal health and immunology, reproductive physiology in livestock, microbial metabolites in food biotechnology, and gut microbiota and health.

The scientist has contributed extensively to fields such as agronomy and crop science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, small animals, molecular biology, and nutrition and dietetics. These subfields reflect the interdisciplinary and applied nature of their work related to livestock production and health.

Klevenhusen's recent publications include work published in several peer-reviewed journals. Key papers are:

  • "A review on the potentials of using feeds rich in water-soluble carbohydrates to enhance rumen health and sustainability of dairy cattle production" (2021), Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
  • "Replacing concentrates with a high-quality hay in the starter feed in dairy calves: I. Effects on nutrient intake, growth performance, and blood metabolic profile" (2022), Journal of Dairy Science
  • "Replacing concentrates with a high-quality hay in the starter feed of dairy calves: II. Effects on the development of chewing and gut fermentation, and selected systemic health variables" (2022), Journal of Dairy Science
  • "Shift of dietary carbohydrate source from milk to various solid feeds reshapes the rumen and fecal microbiome in calves" (2022), Scientific Reports
  • "Investigations on the Transfer of Quinolizidine Alkaloids from Lupinus angustifolius into the Milk of Dairy Cows" (2022), Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Frequent collaborators in Klevenhusen's research include Qendrim Zebeli, Robert Pieper, Georg Terler, Gregor Poier, and Anna Maria Engel. The scientist has published multiple papers with these coauthors, indicating recurring partnerships in research projects relating to animal nutrition and health.

Their work has appeared prominently in journals such as:

  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
  • Archives of Animal Nutrition
  • Journal of Dairy Science
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
  • Scientific Reports

This range of publication venues highlights research at the intersection of food science, animal nutrition, and agricultural practices.

Best Publications

  • Garlic oil and its principal component diallyl disulfide fail to mitigate methane, but improve digestibility in sheep

    F. Klevenhusen;J.O. Zeitz;S. Duval;M. Kreuzer

  • Grain-rich diets differently alter ruminal and colonic abundance of microbial populations and lipopolysaccharide in goats.

    Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli;Stephan Schmitz-Esser;Fenja Klevenhusen;Leopold Podstatzky-Lichtenstein

  • Thyme and cinnamon essential oils: Potential alternatives for monensin as a rumen modifier in beef production systems

    B. Khorrami;A.R. Vakili;M. Danesh Mesgaran;F. Klevenhusen

  • Feeding barley grain-rich diets altered electrophysiological properties and permeability of the ruminal wall in a goat model

    F. Klevenhusen;M. Hollmann;L. Podstatzky-Lichtenstein;R. Krametter-Frötscher

  • Rumen microbial abundance and fermentation profile during severe subacute ruminal acidosis and its modulation by plant derived alkaloids in vitro

    Elsayed Mickdam;Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-ard;Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli;Fenja Klevenhusen

  • Changes in fibre-adherent and fluid-associated microbial communities and fermentation profiles in the rumen of cattle fed diets differing in hay quality and concentrate amount.

    Fenja Klevenhusen;Renee M Petri;Maria-Theresia Kleefisch;Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-Ard

  • Evidence of In Vivo Absorption of Lactate and Modulation of Short Chain Fatty Acid Absorption from the Reticulorumen of Non-Lactating Cattle Fed High Concentrate Diets.

    Muhammad Qumar;Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-ard;Poulad Pourazad;Stefanie U. Wetzels

  • Transient feeding of a concentrate-rich diet increases the severity of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cattle.

    P. Pourazad;R. Khiaosa-ard;M. Qumar;S. U. Wetzels

  • A meta-analysis of effects of chemical composition of incubated diet and bioactive compounds on in vitro ruminal fermentation

    F. Klevenhusen;A. Muro-Reyes;R. Khiaosa-ard;B.U. Metzler-Zebeli

  • Technical note: Evaluation of a real-time wireless pH measurement system relative to intraruminal differences of digesta in dairy cattle.

    F. Klevenhusen;P. Pourazad;S. U. Wetzels;M. Qumar

  • Replacing concentrates with a high-quality hay in the starter feed in dairy calves: I. Effects on nutrient intake, growth performance, and blood metabolic profile.

    Unknown

  • Pyrosequencing reveals shifts in the bacterial epimural community relative to dietary concentrate amount in goats.

    Stefanie Wetzels;Evelyne Mann;Barbara Metzler-Zebeli;Martin Wagner

  • Epimural Indicator Phylotypes of Transiently-Induced Subacute Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cattle

    Stefanie U. Wetzels;Evelyne Mann;Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli;Poulad Pourazad

  • Experimental validation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change default values for ruminant-derived methane and its carbon-isotope signature

    F. Klevenhusen;S. M. Bernasconi;M. Kreuzer;C. R. Soliva

  • Transfer of linoleic and linolenic acid from feed to milk in cows fed isoenergetic diets differing in proportion and origin of concentrates and roughages

    Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-ard;Fenja Klevenhusen;Carla R Soliva;Michael Kreuzer

  • Treatment of grain with organic acids at 2 different dietary phosphorus levels modulates ruminal microbial community structure and fermentation patterns in vitro

    H. Harder;A. Khol-Parisini;B.U. Metzler-Zebeli;F. Klevenhusen

  • Changes in the Rumen Epithelial Microbiota of Cattle and Host Gene Expression in Response to Alterations in Dietary Carbohydrate Composition.

    R. M. Petri;M. T. Kleefisch;B. U. Metzler-Zebeli;Q. Zebeli

  • A review on the potentials of using feeds rich in water-soluble carbohydrates to enhance rumen health and sustainability of dairy cattle production.

    Fenja Klevenhusen;Qendrim Zebeli

  • A meta-analysis of feeding sugar beet pulp in dairy cows: Effects on feed intake, ruminal fermentation, performance, and net food production

    M. Münnich;R. Khiaosa-ard;F. Klevenhusen;A. Hilpold

  • Replacing concentrates with a high-quality hay in the starter feed of dairy calves: II. Effects on the development of chewing and gut fermentation, and selected systemic health variables.

    Unknown

  • Enteric and manure-derived methane and nitrogen emissions as well as metabolic energy losses in cows fed balanced diets based on maize, barley or grass hay

    F. Klevenhusen;M. Kreuzer;C. R. Soliva

  • Graded replacement of corn grain with molassed sugar beet pulp modulates the fecal microbial community and hindgut fermentation profile in lactating dairy cows.

    Renee Maxine Petri;Matthias Münnich;Qendrim Zebeli;Fenja Klevenhusen

  • Effects of black seed oil and Ferula elaeochytris supplementation on ruminal fermentation as tested in vitro with the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)

    F. Klevenhusen;K. Deckardt;Ö. Sizmaz;S. Wimmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Qendrim Zebeli
Qendrim Zebeli University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli
Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Martin Wagner
Martin Wagner University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Leo Meile
Leo Meile ETH Zurich
Florian Leiber
Florian Leiber Research Institute of Organic Agriculture
Jörg R. Aschenbach
Jörg R. Aschenbach Freie Universität Berlin
Winfried Drochner
Winfried Drochner University of Hohenheim
Thomas B. Hofstetter
Thomas B. Hofstetter Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies, exploring related fields can open up diverse career pathways. Many online programs offer accredited degrees that complement animal care and science, such as psychology or counseling disciplines. For example, students can investigate nasp school psychology programs to better understand animal behavior and welfare, which is valuable in veterinary settings.

Additionally, pursuing advanced degrees such as apa accredited psyd programs online can enhance knowledge in clinical psychology, supporting roles related to animal-assisted therapy or veterinary client counseling.

Online options also include specialized counseling fields that connect with overall wellbeing, like becoming a drug counselor online. This can complement veterinary professionals who work with clients managing stress related to pet care or animal welfare issues.

Further studies, for example in marriage and family masters programs, may support holistic approaches to veterinary care by addressing family dynamics that impact pet health decisions.

Exploring these related degrees online provides flexibility and accreditation assurance, allowing students to build diverse skills that enhance careers in animal science and veterinary fields.

Best Scientists Citing Fenja Klevenhusen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles